Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
yea stay away from winrar. its a stupid idea, corruption and u can lose all within. you can add recovery records or par files all you want..but why? its a lot of trouble and time for no reason and just adds a huge risk of data loss. just copy straight to dvdr ..whats so hard about that? double copy if you are paranoid. discs are dirt cheap. and no, even with winrar media compression...its not going to do anything worth bothering with. compression isn't magic after all, mp3s have to resort to being lossy to get the low bitrates they achieve.
Dude, you're not getting it. With recovery records you can decrease your risk.
Consider 10 discs of mps3 in the following scenarios:
1. 10 discs just written file by file.
2. 10 discs written as a spanned winrar volume
3. 12 discs written as a spanned winrar volume with recovery volumes and a recovery record.
What happens if you get a nasty scratch on a disc?
1. You lose whatever files were under the scratch (at best).
2. You lose 100% of your files (at worst)
3. Nothing. The recovery record has enough redundant data.
Now what happens if you completely lose 2 of your discs (or if the scratches above are really extensive)?
1. You lost 20% of your files. The rest are intact.
2. You lost 100% of your files.
3. You lost 0% of your files.
Now which is the best scenario? Keep in mind CD/DVDs WILL rot over time. You're gonna lose some. Personally I dig the whole "lost 0% of your files" scenario.
Compression is a different topic altogether. mp3s won't compress for crap. The only option is a solid archive. The speed of this IMHO makes it not worth the effort. When I backup using winrar I simply put compression on 'store' for mp3s. Very fast.
These backups are for occasional archiving. For dailys I just have an external usb drive and ntbackup. I flip the drive on when I want a backup, flip it off when I'm done. Backup is scheduled to run nightly so it fails or succeeds as needed.