Agreed.
We should kill all those terrorists, their families and their supporters. :thumbsup:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As Nebor States he advocates terrorism, and in a later post says Navy Seals are are really the best at being terrorists.
But still I think we are all missing the point, due to current US tactics in trying to win a military occupation on the cheap, the USA and Nato are in a no win war. The only question is how long the USA and Nato will vaingloriously continue to lose blood and treasure until we pull out, sail home, find some face saving phrase like peace with honor, and say Afghanistan is not worth saving. Meanwhile every US soldier killed or injured is a life pissed away for no US national gain. Just like in Vietnam. And just like in Vietnam, no one in the USA and Nato will learn a damn thing from the experience, especially the lesson on why we lost.
Simply because of three or damn big mistakes. (1) We never looked at Afghanistan from the perspective of the Afghan people. And when the US Nato strategy only boils down to the result of keeping Afghanistan in perpetual anarchy and warfare, the US and Nato have a guaranteed game loser there. (2) We believed our own propaganda, and when we sided with the most corrupt elements in Afghan society, in the war lords, and drug sellers, we don't fool the Afghan people, we fool only ourselves. Because the Afghan people are going to quite properly see us as terrorists and rat finks, and not the good guys. (3) Then we fail to see why the Taliban emerged as the winner of the the Afghan civil war following the Russians leaving. But the Taliban may be brutal, and not liked by the Afghan people, but they are the group that stood up to the Afghan war lords and drug corruption, and at least a modicum of order and stability followed. And now all the Nato and the US has done is bringing back
anarchy and warfare in perpetuity. Nothing is worse than perpetual anarchy.
As we also miss the lesson of the so called surge in Iraq. Was it just adding a few more troops, that is somewhat a no, Obama surged troops in Afghanistan too and got no such positive results. IMHO, it worked in Iraq, not because of a surge, but because US diplomatic efforts with the Sunnis. When it resulted in a big reduction in overall Iraqi violence, it allow Iraq to become manageable in the great reduction of overall violence
But the Afghan level of violence continues to get worse. Connect the dots.