Yes, exactly. That was partly my point. But that same blind faith is used as the basis for believing in the truth of God, Jesus, the Bible and all the rest of the Christian theology.
You really only have 2 choices of interpretation of the Bible and it's accuracy and truth. And these 2 choices would include even a person who is an unbeliever in the doctrines as literal.
You accept the whole convoluted and frequently contradictory mess as literal truth based on blind faith. While in actuality, you are cherry picking what parts to believe and form a basis for a religion or denomination. Because you cannot reconcile many old and new Testament contradictory religious ideals otherwise. And remember that the church decided hundreds of years ago what books to include in the Bible as you mostly see it today.
Or instead you interpret the entire thing as a work of allegorical fiction loosely based on some historical facts and cobbled together from disparate sources and older reinterpreted stories and consider it more of a guidebook to living a spiritual life rather than as an actual passport to an organized religion such as Christianity and it's many variations.
And note the second choice does not necessarily imply a lack of inspired divinity by the writers, but it also does not agree with the premise of blind faith to support it or the literal nature of it as a completely factual spiritual narrative and document, either.
For example, I am not saying that Jesus did not necessarily exist. But what I am saying is that what was written about him was not put down to parchment until many hours, days, months and years after it happened, and done in retrospect and hindsight. And the authors recollections were certainly tainted to some degree to fit their spiritual ideas, too. I seriously doubt two thousand years ago that anyone had stenographers following them around constantly while writing down everything they said verbatim. And these observations are certainly accurate for all the stories in the Bible, whether you believe in it, or not.
Have you ever read the Bible? The entire point of the Bible just went way over your head. It's not meant to be taken literally. It's a collection of stories that were told to explain the unexplainable. It was meant to be a guide for living a fulfilling life. The problem is that it was originally written from the perspective of culture as it was thousands of years ago. Then it was morphed and changed to suit the needs of the elites of changing societies. That's why it's difficult for people to relate to it now. Nowhere was the Bible, itself, ever meant to be a means to prove the existence of God.
