I'm a newbie, but have been reading and learning a lot. I apologize if this question has already been answered elsewhere. I DID try to find it.
The PIII coppermine flipchips have a little hump in the middle that sticks up maybe a millimeter or two. I haven't seen one, but the stock heatsink from Intel appears to have a recess in its thermal tape to accomodate this.
Everything I read about attaching heatsinks to cpu's emphasizes maximizing the contact area, minimizing the air bubbles and making the film of goop (whatever is used) as thin as possible.
With the PIII coppermine FC-PGA the flat heatsink sits atop the little square center elevation and looks like a teeter-totter.
I found one test that tried to use the thin copper shim with the hole in the middle that 3DFXCOOL sells, but there were problems (with shorting?) and (electrical, I think) tape was used to fill in the space and make the heatsink stable/balanced (as in the stock Intel setup, it seems). The heatsink tested OK, but it left me wondering what part of the cpu needs to be cooled (i.e., where is the heat, if not evenly distributed?) The copper shim does not cover the whole cpu, and it doesn't really even get all that close to the raised center part. Consequently, there seems to be fairly little contact surface area.
Every heatsink I've seen pictures of is FLAT. So this problem has to be common. Usually, in the pictures the contact part isn't even shown.
Besides the minimal contact between cpu and heatsink, what about the lack of contact of the whole cpu? (The heatsink CONTACT AREA is not as big as the cpu.... not even close.)
Does anybody have any sources of information about this?
The PIII coppermine flipchips have a little hump in the middle that sticks up maybe a millimeter or two. I haven't seen one, but the stock heatsink from Intel appears to have a recess in its thermal tape to accomodate this.
Everything I read about attaching heatsinks to cpu's emphasizes maximizing the contact area, minimizing the air bubbles and making the film of goop (whatever is used) as thin as possible.
With the PIII coppermine FC-PGA the flat heatsink sits atop the little square center elevation and looks like a teeter-totter.
I found one test that tried to use the thin copper shim with the hole in the middle that 3DFXCOOL sells, but there were problems (with shorting?) and (electrical, I think) tape was used to fill in the space and make the heatsink stable/balanced (as in the stock Intel setup, it seems). The heatsink tested OK, but it left me wondering what part of the cpu needs to be cooled (i.e., where is the heat, if not evenly distributed?) The copper shim does not cover the whole cpu, and it doesn't really even get all that close to the raised center part. Consequently, there seems to be fairly little contact surface area.
Every heatsink I've seen pictures of is FLAT. So this problem has to be common. Usually, in the pictures the contact part isn't even shown.
Besides the minimal contact between cpu and heatsink, what about the lack of contact of the whole cpu? (The heatsink CONTACT AREA is not as big as the cpu.... not even close.)
Does anybody have any sources of information about this?