Heartland Institute pays far-right German girl to be their “Anti-Greta” denying climate change

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,264
9,741
136
You really can’t make this up. Conservatives have been so incensed at the idea of Swedish teen Greta Thunberg telling world leaders what to do. They’ve claimed that she’s just a pawn being used by “climate alarmists”.

So they’ve manufactured their own “Anti Greta”, a German teen who’s paid an “average monthly income” by the Heartland Institute (aka fossil fuels lobby) to be their anti-climate change mouthpiece. She’ll be speaking at CPAC this week!

Even more hilarious, her mother is an AfD lawyer and she’s been linked to the AfD youth wing herself (which she denies—but that’s literally the modern equivalent to the Hitler Youth League!)




Naomi Seibt, 19, who styles herself as a “climate sceptic” or “climate realist”, will this week address the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) near Washington, joining speakers including Donald Trump and Vice-President Mike Pence.

Seibt is in the pay of the Heartland Institute, a thinktank closely allied with the White House that denies established science showing humans are heating the planet with dangerous consequences.

CPAC will be the biggest stage yet for Seibt, a so-called “YouTube influencer” who tells her followers Thunberg and other activists are whipping up unnecessary hysteria by exaggerating the climate crisis.
...
The teenager, from Münster in western Germany, claims she is “without an agenda, without an ideology”. But she was pushed into the limelight by leading figures on the German far right and her mother, a lawyer, has represented politicians from the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party in court.
...
A Facebook post by the AfD youth wing names Seibt as a member and she spoke at a recent AfD event, though she has denied membership of the party.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
38,116
30,919
136
So fucking desperate and funny at the same time. Wonder who sold CPAC that bill of goods. Think her session will come right after "Why slavery was good for blacks" seminar?
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,264
9,741
136
jesus. This is child abuse.

No. She’s 19 and getting paid for her efforts. She’s basically a young blonde European lobbyist who probably appeals to American conservative boomers with...umm...certain appetites.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
38,116
30,919
136
Haha. Did CPAC check this chicks entire resume? Albeit flawed logic she is for gay people coming out. She doesn't realize in this country conservatives are in favor of laws that allow people being fired just for being gay. She's pretty articulate and seems intelligent at least in this video

 

Lanyap

Elite Member
Dec 23, 2000
8,242
2,329
136
Not surprising.

But I have to ask, who is funding Greta? I used my Google fu but could not find the answer to that question. She’s 17 yo traveling the world talking about CC. Who’s paying for that? Speculation in the media is that it’s her parents but nothing confirmed. OP’s article identifies who is funding “anti-Geta” in the third paragraph.
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
21,729
6,150
136
If her eyes were any further apart they'd have to work independently.
On the marketing issue, I guess we now have dueling blond girls, and I still don't care. Didn't care what the first one had to say, don't care what this one has to say. Don't care whos paying their salreys, or who's writing their scripts. This is marketing, and like most marketing, all it is is annoying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pcgeek11

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,264
9,741
136
Not surprising.

But I have to ask, who is funding Greta? I used my Google fu but could not find the answer to that question. She’s 17 yo traveling the world talking about CC. Who’s paying for that? Speculation in the media is that it’s her parents but nothing confirmed. OP’s article identifies who is funding “anti-Geta” in the third paragraph.

I was convinced it was Soros, Antifa and ISIS funding her!!

But seriously, Greta has accepted offers of carbon-neutral transport to get around to various conferences and UN meetings. Pretty sure various foundations and their well-heeled donors are supporting her, but she isn’t paid to say what she says.

 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
38,116
30,919
136
If her eyes were any further apart they'd have to work independently.
On the marketing issue, I guess we now have dueling blond girls, and I still don't care. Didn't care what the first one had to say, don't care what this one has to say. Don't care whos paying their salreys, or who's writing their scripts. This is marketing, and like most marketing, all it is is annoying.
Since you brought it up reminds me of...
D5GJIIXKPFANHKUBKPVWQJP3R4
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,320
126
Not surprising.

But I have to ask, who is funding Greta? I used my Google fu but could not find the answer to that question. She’s 17 yo traveling the world talking about CC. Who’s paying for that? Speculation in the media is that it’s her parents but nothing confirmed. OP’s article identifies who is funding “anti-Geta” in the third paragraph.
Why does it matter? If it is her parents all the better, her parents are in favor of her message!! It is noce to have parental support!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,589
30,849
146
Remember those conservatives here that oft use one of the attack lines "Ain't nobody wants to listen to a kid!"?

Yeah, I guess that isn't actually true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

Torn Mind

Lifer
Nov 25, 2012
12,004
2,748
136
Teenagers are just starting to acquire concepts to understand and have yet to accumulate a truly deep pool of knowledge to work with. They do not have anything new to say but they are more palatable messengers than old people in suits. Youth is the sugar of persuasion.

Environmental damage and climate change are interrelated but not synonymous. Climate change puts drapes on non-emission damage to the environment and propagates an utter disregard for local ecosystems. It's is for city dwellers of LA to absolve themselves of guilt that they live in a concrete jungle and engage in decadent behavior contrary to saving the environment.