- Feb 18, 2010
- 2,893
- 0
- 0
This has the potential to go political, but I'd like to discuss this one on a more personal level. If it does get partisan, I'll have to ask for this thread to be moved to P&N. Don't say I didn't warn you!
I found the following blog post referenced on the Freakonomics Blog:
http://zocalopublicsquare.org/thepublicsquare/2011/11/30/how-doctors-die/read/nexus/
All of this person's "information" is anecdotal, so I don't know if most doctors share his view (my mother, a doctor, is somewhere in between). However, I'm interested in what YOUR views on end-of-life care is.
I think for me, it would depend on what stage in my life I were at. If I were to get metastatic cancer now, I'd want to fight it if I had any meaningful chance of survival. My chances are better for survival, I'd likely be able to take the chemo better, and I have potentially many years of my life to gain if I survive.
In 30-40 years, I don't think I'll feel that way. The number of quality years I'd get would be far fewer, and I'd suffer a lot more in the process.
What say you? If your doctor gave you a 20% chance to live, but said you had to go through painful treatment, or offered hospice, what would you do?
I found the following blog post referenced on the Freakonomics Blog:
http://zocalopublicsquare.org/thepublicsquare/2011/11/30/how-doctors-die/read/nexus/
Its not a frequent topic of discussion, but doctors die, too. And they dont die like the rest of us. Whats unusual about them is not how much treatment they get compared to most Americans, but how little. For all the time they spend fending off the deaths of others, they tend to be fairly serene when faced with death themselves. They know exactly what is going to happen, they know the choices, and they generally have access to any sort of medical care they could want. But they go gently.
.
.
.
Almost all medical professionals have seen what we call futile care being performed on people. Thats when doctors bring the cutting edge of technology to bear on a grievously ill person near the end of life. The patient will get cut open, perforated with tubes, hooked up to machines, and assaulted with drugs. All of this occurs in the Intensive Care Unit at a cost of tens of thousands of dollars a day. What it buys is misery we would not inflict on a terrorist. I cannot count the number of times fellow physicians have told me, in words that vary only slightly, Promise me if you find me like this that youll kill me. They mean it. Some medical personnel wear medallions stamped NO CODE to tell physicians not to perform CPR on them. I have even seen it as a tattoo.
All of this person's "information" is anecdotal, so I don't know if most doctors share his view (my mother, a doctor, is somewhere in between). However, I'm interested in what YOUR views on end-of-life care is.
I think for me, it would depend on what stage in my life I were at. If I were to get metastatic cancer now, I'd want to fight it if I had any meaningful chance of survival. My chances are better for survival, I'd likely be able to take the chemo better, and I have potentially many years of my life to gain if I survive.
In 30-40 years, I don't think I'll feel that way. The number of quality years I'd get would be far fewer, and I'd suffer a lot more in the process.
What say you? If your doctor gave you a 20% chance to live, but said you had to go through painful treatment, or offered hospice, what would you do?