• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

HDTV Resolution

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: BigToque
I've read that the content on most HD discs (HD-DVD and Blu-Ray) are encoded at 1080i. Does that mean 1080i60?

If something is encoded on a HD disc in 1080i60 (frames per second), can it be perfectly deinterlaced and shown at 1080p24?

Is that what 3:2 pulldown is?

If what I asked is true, why would content makers even bother encoding it at 1080i60 and not just put it on the disc at 1080p24?

No deinterlacing is perfect. You lose some resolution when you do it.

Why would you lose resolution?

Because if you're trying to view an interlaced video on a non-interlaced screen (like a computer monitor), the fields won't match up; one will be slightly offset if there's any movement. It'll look like you're looking through venetian blinds.

In order to get rid of the interlacing, you have to use some technique to get rid of it. All of the techniques cause resolution to be lost. The most common one is to strip every other line and just double the remaining ones. As you can see, you'd lose half of your resolution. Another way is to blend the two fields, but this makes it blurry and you lose detail. There's no perfect way around it, other than recording the video in progressive scan mode.
 
Back
Top