HDTach 3.00 Beta

[NFS4]

http://fileforum.betanews.com/detail.php3?fid=1075481668

 

[JBT]

nice THANKS!!!

 

[NFS4]

Specs are in my sig (A64 3200+, 2GB, 74GB Raptor)

Short:

Burst: 119.3
Avg: 64.1
7.9 ms
4% CPU


Long:

Burst 124.6
Avg: 64.1
8.0 ms
7% CPU

 

[JBT]

TEST results
(1)WD 74 GB RAptor on SI 3112 SATA RAID controller

Short Test 8mb zone

CPU 8%
7.9ms
AVG 64.7mbps
Burst 126.2mpbs

Long test 32mb zone

CPU 8%
8.0ms
Avg 64.0mbps
Burst 126.7mpbs

 

[NFS4]

Damn, those results are pretty damn close I'm using the built in SiS SATA controller.

 

[JBT]

yeah they are

 

[JBT]

After a few more runs of the short test my CPU jumps around a bit from 0% to 4% and then 7% . Kinda weird with a 0% in there...

 

[Monoman]

I will report back with my 15k.3 drives in compairson to those raptors. should be close

 

[Markfw]

This beta is buggy:
First my SATA 120 gig Maxtor:
Burst 1,723.0 NOT A TYPO
Random access 13.7
CPU 0
Avg 48.8

Now my 5 disk SCSI raid array with 128 meg cache:
Burst 61.1
Random access 8.9
CPU 0
Avg 20.3

And I ran long and short and multiple times. I don't believe either results. The Burst on the SATA is impossible, and the SCSI is way too slow on all compared to real performance.

 

[Monoman]

Originally posted by: Markfw900
This beta is buggy:

First my SATA 120 gig Maxtor:

Burst 1,723.0 NOT A TYPO

Random access 13.7

CPU 0

Avg 48.8



Not my 5 disk SCSI raid array with 128 meg cache:

Burst 61.1

Random access 8.9

CPU 0

Avg 20.3



And I can long and short and multiple times. I don't believe either results. The Burst on the SATA is impossible, and the SCSI is way too slow on all compared to real performance.

oops??? lol good job Mark. maybe a bug or a config error? have you reported this to Simpli Sostware yet?

 

[LED]

From RAID0 Setups
2 Hitachi SATA 80 giggers on the DFI NForce LanParty: OS is XP NFTS

Short Burst:127.9mbps

Random Acess 12.8ms
CPU utilization 4% (+/-2%)
Average Read 96.1mbps

Long Burst:123.9

Random Acess 13.0ms
CPU utilization 8% (+/-2%)
Average Read 95.6mbps


2 36 Gigger Raptors on the Intel DFI Lanparty: OS is XP on 2 Partitions FAT32+NFTS

Short Burst:185.7

Random Acess 8.9ms
CPU utilization 3% (+/-2%)
Average Read 74.69mbps

Long Burst: 188.6

Random Acess 8.8ms
CPU utilization 3% (+/-2%)
Average Read 86.1mbps

Edit is updated results

 

[Markfw]

Now I run it under win XP (the other post was Win2k)
First my SATA 120 gig Maxtor:
2k XP
Burst 1,723.0 NOT A TYPO 1944
Random access 13.7 13.4
CPU 0 2
Avg 48.8 48.9

Now my 5 disk SCSI raid array with 128 meg cache:

Burst 61.1 96 (first run, second run was 63)
Random access 8.9 8.0
CPU 0 2
Avg 20.3 43.1

And I ran long and short and multiple times. I don't believe either results. The Burst on the SATA is impossible, and the SCSI is way too slow on all compared to real performance.
Edit: my spaces don't seem to show up....
Really buggy software........

 

[Gagabiji]

Ok, what is HDTech?

 

[Shooters]

Originally posted by: SirDude
Ok, what is HDTech?

HDTach is hard drive benchmark.

 

[microAmp]

Short:
Burst: 98.1
Avg: 35.5
14.4ms
2%

Long:
Burst: 99.5
Avg: 33.0
14.5ms
5%

SCSI Cheetah 15.3 15kRPM

 

[SgtZulu]

Originally posted by: SirDude
Ok, what is HDTech?

Dick wagging contest

 

[oldfart]

On an Abit IC7 ICH5....

WD 740GD

Short:

Burst: 128.6
Avg: 64.5
7.8 ms
3% CPU

Long:

Burst 129
Avg: 64.8
7.8 ms
2% CPU

WD 1200JB

Short:

Burst: 96.4
Avg: 41.2
13.5 ms
2% CPU

Long:

Burst 98.4
Avg: 41.2
13.6 ms
2% CPU

 

[MemberSince97]

1st. Gen. Cheetah 15k1/ada29160 con/nf2mobo
short
RA/time 6.7
CPU.u 0%
AVG. Read 37.2 mbps
Burst 130 mbps

long
RA 6.7
CPU.u 0%
AVG. Read37.4
Burst 130.2

Not bad for a 4 year old drive???

 

[JonnyBlaze]

i have a first gen raptor. this is a long read test.

random: 8.6
cpu: 2%
average:48.7
burst: 109.1

JBlaze

 

[MemberSince97]

Originally posted by: microAmp
Short:
Burst: 98.1
Avg: 35.5
14.4ms
2%

Long:
Burst: 99.5
Avg: 33.0
14.5ms
5%

SCSI Cheetah 15.3 15kRPM

Somethings fishy here.

 

[MemberSince97]

Okay, I ran three short and three long test test and only burst marginally changed.

 

[Algere]

Test Setup
2 x Hitachi SATA 7K250 80GB on VIA RAID controller (ASUS K8V-D/A64 3000+)

Quick Read (8mb zones)

1st Run:
CPU [10%]
Random Access [15ms]
Average Read [96.2mbps]
Burst Speed [1358.4mbps]

2nd Run:
CPU [7%]
Random Access [14.2ms]
Average Read [95.7mbps]
Burst Speed [1749.4mbps]

3rd Run:
CPU [4%]
Random Access [14.3ms]
Average Read [96.2mbps]
Burst Speed [1673.4mbps]

Long Read (32mb zones)

1st Run:
CPU [7%]
Random Access [14.4ms]
Average Read [95.6mbps]
Burst Speed [1480.3mbps]

2nd Run:
CPU [8%]
Random Access [14.2ms]
Average Read [96.2mbps]
Burst Speed [1503.3mbps]

3rd Run:
CPU [4%]
Random Access [14.3ms]
Average Read [95.7mbps]
Burst Speed [1539.5mbps]

 

[tbooth]

74GB Raptor

Quick
Random access: 8.1ms
CPU: 2%
Average read: 64.1mbps
Burst 124.0mbps

Long
Random access: 8.1ms
CPU: 5%
Average read: 65mbps
Burst: 122.4mbps

80GB Maxtor 7200 rpm

Quick
Random access 15ms
CPU: 4%
AVerage read: 48.2mbps
Burst: 127.9mbps

Long
Random access 14.8ms
CPU: 4%
Average read: 48.4mbps
Burst 124.3mbps


I also noticed that when i had more than one copy of the program running that CPU utilization always showed zero.

 

[Chad]

Question: Why, if this is the 3.00 Beta do they keep trying sending me "HDTach-2.9.2.0-Setup.exe" when I click on the link??????????????????????????????????

 

[Algere]

Dunno why but during the install process it says Beta 3 in red I think.