HD 6950 for low 1440x900 resolution

cooper69

Member
Jun 25, 2015
49
0
6
would this suffice for modern-ish games? highest settings aren't necessary, medium to low work
 

ViRGE

Elite Member, Moderator Emeritus
Oct 9, 1999
31,516
167
106
This isn't the greatest time since AMD just dropped support for the card, but yeah, if it's a 2GB model it should suffice. Performance should be somewhere between a modern Radeon R7 360 and R7 370.
 

Shmee

Memory & Storage, Graphics Cards Mod Elite Member
Super Moderator
Sep 13, 2008
7,847
2,806
146
It may also unlock :D
 

SPBHM

Diamond Member
Sep 12, 2012
5,060
413
126
unless you are getting it for free or almost free I would pass, 1GB is horrible for games like Fallout 4 and the driver support was bad and yesterday it basically ended.

now it will work well for old games, and some not so old games, but for things to be released on the near future, and as I mentioned Fallout 4 and other recent games it can be quite bad, a 260X/gtx 750 2GB is much better.
 

aaksheytalwar

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2012
3,389
0
76
1GB is too little for modern games. Had it been a 2GB model you'd do okay for most games at 720p/900p at minimum/low.

Assuming you have a quad core desktop i5 2500 or better that is. At the least.
 

aaksheytalwar

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2012
3,389
0
76
In 2016 I would expect 7850 to 7950 2GB+ to become the norm for low at 1440x900 for a good experience. Along with a 2500k/2600k @ 4/4.5GHz at the very minimum.
 

Leyawiin

Diamond Member
Nov 11, 2008
3,204
52
91
There are so many good deals on GPUs at this time of year it almost makes me sad to see someone with such an old card. ;)
 

cooper69

Member
Jun 25, 2015
49
0
6
It's a core 2 quad at 3 ghz :( it's a Friend's system but he wont be playing the most demanding of games like TW 3 and Fallout 4. It'll mostly be for other games that came out pre 2014. But he does want to play the newest assassins creed and i predict that it'll be an unplayable experience
 

AtenRa

Lifer
Feb 2, 2009
14,003
3,362
136
It's a core 2 quad at 3 ghz :( it's a Friend's system but he wont be playing the most demanding of games like TW 3 and Fallout 4. It'll mostly be for other games that came out pre 2014. But he does want to play the newest assassins creed and i predict that it'll be an unplayable experience

A Quad Core 2 at 3GHz with the HD6950 will be able to play all the pre 2014 games easily at 900p. I will say even GTAV and Witcher 3.
 

SPBHM

Diamond Member
Sep 12, 2012
5,060
413
126
I would assume the 2 latest Assassins Creed will not run well enough,

Witcher 3 and GTA V should be playable with significantly reduced settings and some performance problems,

fallout 4 is just horrible once you hit the heavier areas with 1GB, and the DX11 Radeons also have a bug with godrays.
 

ViRGE

Elite Member, Moderator Emeritus
Oct 9, 1999
31,516
167
106
it's the 1gb model :( wasn't even 2 gb considered overkill back when these cards first came out?
2GB was the standard configuration. 1GB was a budget configuration released later.

In any case, as the others have noted you can get away with it to a degree. But more recent AAA games are going to have a hard time fitting into 1GB even with everything turned down.
 

Zodiark1593

Platinum Member
Oct 21, 2012
2,230
4
81
If you're getting the game, upgrade or not, run it on your system as is and let us know the result.
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
It's a core 2 quad at 3 ghz :( it's a Friend's system but he wont be playing the most demanding of games like TW 3 and Fallout 4. It'll mostly be for other games that came out pre 2014. But he does want to play the newest assassins creed and i predict that it'll be an unplayable experience

Don't worry about AC Unity or Syndicate as you can easily spend $550 on a graphics card and they'll still get hammered maxed out. The last 2 AC titles are extremely demanding (or poorly optimized with everything maxed out).

http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test_GPU-Action-Assassins_Creed_Syndicate-test-ACS_1920_aa.jpg


If he already has the 6950 card, go with that for now. Unfortunately for your friend, even if you upgrade the graphics card, in some games a C2Q @ 3Ghz is slow...

CPU.png


... even when paired with a GTX980:

Gaming_02.png

Gaming_03.png

Gaming_05.png


Luckily for your friend, it's possible to get a decent Core i3 4170 CPU+GTX 950/R9 380 GPU+mobo+8GB DDR3 memory upgrade for $300 or so <-- and that rig will provide a better gaming experience than a PS4.
 
Last edited:

ultima_trev

Member
Nov 4, 2015
148
66
66
I recently came from an HD 7850 OC (2GB) and there were a few AAA games at 1650*1080 that made me realize it was time for an upgrade. I imagine 1440*900 won't be much of a difference and the 6950 is even worse than the 7850.