I'd first have to define "man of integrity" before applying that to Barr.
We assume way too much of these guys, especially anyone that would collude with Donald trump.
Who says Barr was ever a "man of integrity"?
If a crook called another fellow crook a "man of integrity", would that necessarily mean anything?
And besides, aren't all of these high powered men in congress and in politics part of those dubious secret organizations we always hear about?
The ole buddy buddy secret societies?
I know the Bush men were, and Bret Kavanaugh also was and still is, and most every politician of power, CEO executive, filthy rich corporation head, and the list goes on and on.
With Donald Trump now in power, the men of the secret societies have found their opportunity. Have found their chance to control and to take control of more than they ever had imagined. They not only have all the wealth and power, now they can ensure it stays that way forever.
People have this false illusion that everything is on the up and up. That people in power are automatically moral, fair, deserving, and trustworthy people. For the sake of argument, lets just say they are not worthy nor trustworthy. None of them. Not a single one.
Getting back to Barr, William Barr is no different.
It's not that Barr was ever a "man of integrity", it's more a case of now we know he never was.
Barr's association with Donald Trump will be his legacy, not some idiotic idea that Barr was ever a "man of integrity". One crook patting another crook on the back.