- May 19, 2011
- 17,675
- 9,516
- 136
Something occurred to me recently that surprised me: If a customer's desktop monitor died, no matter what the specs of the old monitor were, I've never thought along the lines of buying a 'like for like' replacement by default. Sure, if it's an old desktop (it would have to be really old now to not support 1080p), I'd take its graphics hardware into account (esp. on Win10, how is its driver support these days, could a higher resolution monitor be problematic?). But on a laptop I only recently considered this.
It's common on laptops these days to have say a 15.6" wide-screen monitor that can do 1366x768, but the graphics hardware can obviously do say 1080p, so why not use a 1080p screen? Obviously it needs to be the same physical size overall. Why is it that when I've searched for a replacement screen for a given laptop, I only get like-for-like replacements (with maybe the choice of matte and gloss if I'm lucky)?
My concerns in trying this would be a) the graphics connector, b) screw points to attach it to the laptop, c) the screen's power requirements and whether the laptop's power system can drive it effectively, d) is the graphics connector in the same place so the cable will reach it.
It's common on laptops these days to have say a 15.6" wide-screen monitor that can do 1366x768, but the graphics hardware can obviously do say 1080p, so why not use a 1080p screen? Obviously it needs to be the same physical size overall. Why is it that when I've searched for a replacement screen for a given laptop, I only get like-for-like replacements (with maybe the choice of matte and gloss if I'm lucky)?
My concerns in trying this would be a) the graphics connector, b) screw points to attach it to the laptop, c) the screen's power requirements and whether the laptop's power system can drive it effectively, d) is the graphics connector in the same place so the cable will reach it.