Have humans evolved (biologically) in the last 5000 years?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
In order to evolve...the weak must die, preferably early before they can reproduce. Everything we do as a society usually helps keep the weak alive. So if anything, we're devolving.
Yeah, I've said that before. You've got capable, successful middle and upper class people who have 2-3 kids, and then some redneck cross breeding dumb as crap hicks who crank out 6 crotch dumplings, who then do the same. We, the "better", are a dying breed! I guess maybe in the grand scheme evolution would rather see a bunch of dumb breed-happy people, than more conservative. Darn!
 

Looney

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
21,938
5
0
Originally posted by: Skoorb
In order to evolve...the weak must die, preferably early before they can reproduce. Everything we do as a society usually helps keep the weak alive. So if anything, we're devolving.
Yeah, I've said that before. You've got capable, successful middle and upper class people who have 2-3 kids, and then some redneck cross breeding dumb as crap hicks who crank out 6 crotch dumplings, who then do the same. We, the "better", are a dying breed! I guess maybe in the grand scheme evolution would rather see a bunch of dumb breed-happy people, than more conservative. Darn!

You're assuming there is an intelligence genetics difference between the middle/upperclass and lower class. I think the differences between the middle/upper class are more due to opportunities than genetics.
 

fredtam

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2003
5,694
2
76
Originally posted by: Hardcore
Originally posted by: Skoorb
In order to evolve...the weak must die, preferably early before they can reproduce. Everything we do as a society usually helps keep the weak alive. So if anything, we're devolving.
Yeah, I've said that before. You've got capable, successful middle and upper class people who have 2-3 kids, and then some redneck cross breeding dumb as crap hicks who crank out 6 crotch dumplings, who then do the same. We, the "better", are a dying breed! I guess maybe in the grand scheme evolution would rather see a bunch of dumb breed-happy people, than more conservative. Darn!

You're assuming there is an intelligence genetics difference between the middle/upperclass and lower class. I think the differences between the middle/upper class are more due to opportunities than genetics.

Exactly. The potential is there.
 

fredtam

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2003
5,694
2
76
Originally posted by: Skoorb
In order to evolve...the weak must die, preferably early before they can reproduce. Everything we do as a society usually helps keep the weak alive. So if anything, we're devolving.
Yeah, I've said that before. You've got capable, successful middle and upper class people who have 2-3 kids, and then some redneck cross breeding dumb as crap hicks who crank out 6 crotch dumplings, who then do the same. We, the "better", are a dying breed! I guess maybe in the grand scheme evolution would rather see a bunch of dumb breed-happy people, than more conservative. Darn!

I'm assuming all of your ancestors were middle/ upper class?
 

RobCur

Banned
Oct 4, 2002
3,076
0
0
we are evolving all the time, yesterday I was an ape; today I'm a human being just like everyone else. of course my parents aren't ape but many generations ago they were... :)