• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

HASWELL core I5: Performance Preview

C

csbin

Senior member
Source: http://translate.google.com.hk/tran...ttp://www.chinadiy.com.cn/html/55/n-8455.html

Source: http://translate.google.com.hk/tran...ttp://www.chinadiy.com.cn/html/58/n-8458.html

fO4mGod.png


3yxX6el.jpg


QE65bcX.png
 
Last edited:
GPU score on the second screen shot is basically the same I used to get with a 9600GT.


are you sure it's running at 3GHz when all the cores are being loaded?
 
This will make 2500k/2600k owners happy as they can confidently skip 22nm altogether and just wait it out another year to see what 14nm brings.
 
I'm gonna wait for some more benchmarks first. I was thinking of getting another pc with an ivy i5 (cause we all need 5 computers right?), but i thought I would just upgrade straight to Haswell. This is a little more depressing than I was hoping it would be though. I don't know if the optimized code will even make this worth it over current cpus for a little while.
 
jpiniero said:
The article does mention they were able to set the memory to like 2800 Mhz.
Click to expand...

That is still unlikely to give 42.7 GB/sec (this is basically 95+% of theoretical compared to about 70-80% for ivy bridge).

128 bit ddr3?

What is impressive is that the system is using less than the whole tdp under load (82 watts).
 
I just want to know what power and overclocking look like. I already know performance isn't going to be a huge deal.
 
Enigmoid said:
That is still unlikely to give 42.7 GB/sec (this is basically 95+% of theoretical compared to about 70-80% for ivy bridge).

128 bit ddr3?

What is impressive is that the system is using less than the whole tdp under load (82 watts).
Click to expand...

If this is real, then the system must be underclocked, right?
 
Toms Hardware showed a 3 to 13 percent increase in performance over Ivy. Not sure I would trust any of these early leaks too much. For sure there will not be a spectacular gain, I think that is about all we can say.
 
frozentundra123456 said:
Toms Hardware showed a 3 to 13 percent increase in performance over Ivy. Not sure I would trust any of these early leaks too much. For sure there will not be a spectacular gain, I think that is about all we can say.
Click to expand...
The only performance preview that matters to me is the AnandTech one 🙂
 
Absolute performance wasnt the priority in Haswell, but mobile performance per watt, graphics and the new pipeline with AVX/FMA3.
 
I'd wait till actual benchmarks to make a judgement call, but Haswell was made more for mobile than desktop/powerusers/overclockers
 
Idontcare said:
This will make 2500k/2600k owners happy as they can confidently skip 22nm altogether and just wait it out another year to see what 14nm brings.
Click to expand...
If it doesn't OC well and get ~5% average IPC increase, I'll just skip down to Microcenter and build a 3930K setup.
 
WhoBeDaPlaya said:
If it doesn't OC well and get ~5% average IPC increase, I'll just skip down to Microcenter and build a 3930K setup.
Click to expand...

I am with you on that! That new Asus P9X79 WS-E MB looks sweet!!!! and a 3930k. And if HW-E isn't here until 2014 Nov time frame ugh... that 3930k is going to be around for a long time to come then...
 
Forget the (non-changed) Physics score in Vantage, even worse is the 3dmark11 GPU score of just 530 (compare to 550 on i3 IB with HD4000). I suppose that in 3mdark11 the GPU might have been at 800Mhz instead of maximum of 1200Mhz, but even at 1200Mhz it would score ~800pts in GPU subtest while (now old) Trinity gets 1360pts and Richland will score even more more(~10-15%) on stock. Drivers can be tuned though so I suppose 3dmark11 will be higher on the retail product, but it won't come close to Trinity. Also performance in games might be different than these tests so iGPU performance is still unknown.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top