Originally posted by: tim924
It's pretty pointless to compare a $320 Q9550 with a $160 phenom 9850,of course the double-priced product will win in the realistic world,it's more helpful if you provide comparison within the same price range at least to come up with a relatively accurate result.
it's pretty pointless to point out the difference in price of both processors, don't you think?
The whole idea of overclocking is to get your CPU at such a frequency where you do not have to spend the extra $$$ for an extreme/black edition.
for example, why buy the QX9650 when you can do with with the Q9650 and get some astonishing results as well?
not to mention that intel users have successfully attained 4GHz with an E7300
I left the AMD ship after doing some research which (at that time) dualcore would give me the best results in terms of overclocking, the price was on second place. Suprisingly, the C2D's, especially the E6x50's overclocked pretty well.
Had mine running @ 3.8Ghz for quite a while until I went Quads.
I still sticked to Intel with my Q9550. Not to mention I already invested in intel hardware (intel motherboard chipset), I did not feel the need to step to AMD quads.
Don't take me wrong, he AMD's are by no means bad, but when I am looking for the best possible overclock and performance, the decision was quite easy since I already owned an Intel chipset based motherboard.
I'm glad overclocking isn't just pushing a button to get the highest possible frequency out of my chip. Enough space to twiddle around with it a bit more =)