Has anyone read Freakonomics: ?

glen

Lifer
Apr 28, 2000
15,995
1
81
The arrived via Amazon yesterday, and I read 3/4th of it yesterday becasue it was so fascinating.
 

Taggart

Diamond Member
Apr 23, 2001
4,384
0
0
nope

I am reading a book by Michael Collins about his experiences in the Gemini and Apollo programs.
 

xospec1alk

Diamond Member
Mar 4, 2002
4,329
0
0
i read it at barnes and nobles...i started reading it to see if i would enjoy it...next thing you know, i had finished the book... :)
 

oboeguy

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 1999
3,907
0
76
Originally posted by: Taggart
nope

I am reading a book by Michael Collins about his experiences in the Gemini and Apollo programs.

I started reading that post and thought you were reading about the Irish revolutionary.

Edit: clarity
 

glen

Lifer
Apr 28, 2000
15,995
1
81
Freakonomics : A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner

Editorial Reviews

Amazon.com
Economics is not widely considered to be one of the sexier sciences. The annual Nobel Prize winner in that field never receives as much publicity as his or her compatriots in peace, literature, or physics. But if such slights are based on the notion that economics is dull, or that economists are concerned only with finance itself, Steven D. Levitt will change some minds. In Freakonomics (written with Stephen J. Dubner), Levitt argues that many apparent mysteries of everyday life don't need to be so mysterious: they could be illuminated and made even more fascinating by asking the right questions and drawing connections. For example, Levitt traces the drop in violent crime rates to a drop in violent criminals and, digging further, to the Roe v. Wade decision that preempted the existence of some people who would be born to poverty and hardship. Elsewhere, by analyzing data gathered from inner-city Chicago drug-dealing gangs, Levitt outlines a corporate structure much like McDonald's, where the top bosses make great money while scores of underlings make something below minimum wage. And in a section that may alarm or relieve worried parents, Levitt argues that parenting methods don't really matter much and that a backyard swimming pool is much more dangerous than a gun. These enlightening chapters are separated by effusive passages from Dubner's 2003 profile of Levitt in The New York Times Magazine, which led to the book being written. In a book filled with bold logic, such back-patting veers Freakonomics, however briefly, away from what Levitt actually has to say. Although maybe there's a good economic reason for that too, and we're just not getting it yet. --John Moe
 

geecee

Platinum Member
Jan 14, 2003
2,383
43
91
Very interesting (and controversial) book. His abortion/reduction in crime theory, although supported by his numbers and arguments, is a theory that could be just as unpopular with the left as it is the right. His names analysis was a little more light hearted but still very interesting.
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
that a backyard swimming pool is much more dangerous than a gun
I KNEW it. Guns don't kill people, water does.;)
 

glen

Lifer
Apr 28, 2000
15,995
1
81
Do you think parents tend to be more educated if they name their son DeShawn or Jake?
Jazmine or Emily?
 

Lorax

Golden Member
Apr 14, 2000
1,658
0
0
haven't read it, but i suspect it is a bit frustrating since the book comes to some somewhat logical conclusions that the govt doesn't do anything about.

i think there's an official blog for the book that is pretty decent.
 

Demon-Xanth

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
20,551
2
81
Originally posted by: techs
that a backyard swimming pool is much more dangerous than a gun
I KNEW it. Guns don't kill people, water does.;)

How many kids drown vs. get shot accidentally?
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,574
126
Originally posted by: geecee
Very interesting (and controversial) book. His abortion/reduction in crime theory, although supported by his numbers and arguments, is a theory that could be just as unpopular with the left as it is the right. His names analysis was a little more light hearted but still very interesting.

i don't think it's even his theory. i've read the actual journal article elsewhere. i wrote a law and economics paper based on it, in fact
 

glen

Lifer
Apr 28, 2000
15,995
1
81
I read the whole book, but I must have missed the chapter on how much money an Asian man needs to make to date a white girl.
What Chapter is it in?