Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: Dari
Limbaugh is not a neocon by any stretch of the imagination. Are you starting these anti-Obama threads to justify your support of McCain?
Ideologically he's a lot closer to the "new"(or neo) conservative than to that of the traditional conservative.
And no I don't currently support any of these candidates as the top three really only differ on the surface. Non of them will "change" anything.
FOR smaller gov't?
FOR less taxes?
FOR US sovereignty?
Thats NOT a neo con. Thats traditional.
That's the platform that Bush ran on and that's what all the republicans say. The fact is the Bush administration have spent more money than any government in our history and the senate & house, both democrat and republican, have played right along.
I don't care what they say I care what they do.
We'll never
ever get change if we don't start scrutinizing the voting records of the people we elect. Both parties are monumental spenders and when it comes time to vote the republicans always vote for;
larger government
more taxes
and against U.S. sovereignty.
Rush has supported these neo-cons for many years through thick and thin.
if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck...it's probably a duck.
Im not arguing that. Im arguing principles. dont confuse the two.
Oh and dont have any illusions. Bush spent more than Clinton
who spent more than Bush
who spent more than Reagan
who spent more than Carter
who spent more than Ford
who spent more than Nixon
who spent more than Johnson
who spent more than Kennedy
who spent more than Eisenhower....on and on and on.
Get it? And guess what-the next president will spend more than GWB.