Has anyone else noticed this?

[TourGuide]

I'm running a 213T here and I notice a distinct fuzziness to the nV 6800GT image (coming from DVI) as opposed to my 9800XT (coming from DVI also). There is no mistaking the difference. Has anyone else noticed this? It bothers me so much, I decided to go back to ATI.

 

[Elcs]

Originally posted by: TourGuide
I'm running a 213T here and I notice a distinct fuzziness to the nV 6800GT image (coming from DVI) as opposed to my 9800XT (coming from DVI also). There is no mistaking the difference. Has anyone else noticed this? It bothers me so much, I decided to go back to ATI.

Although Ive never compared my old Leadtek Ti4400 to my Radeon 9800P on DVI with my LG 17" LCD.... I have used both graphics cards at different times on this monitor using DVI.

I can honestly say I can see no difference. Whether Id be saying the same if I truely had them side by side so I could check, I cant say. I saw no difference switching over.

 

[mattsaccount]

Having upgraded from a 9500 Pro to a 6800GT, I can say I see no difference in DVI image quality. VGA image quality is much better--on the 9500 pro, I got this "wavy" effect which bugged the hell out of me. Maybe your card has issues

 

[Pete]

If that 213T has a higher than 16x12 native res, I've heard that a HOCP forum thread noted that BFG has said their DVI ports are good for only 16x12. Or you could just have a fluke bad card or cable. Email BFG and see what they say about it.

Are you sure you have 'reduced blanking interval' or something similar checked in the card's driver settings?

 

[badnewcastle]

No probs here with my bfg 6800GT and I have it on a kvm switch and a 17" LCD!!!