• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Harvard cracks DNA storage, crams 700 terabytes of data into a single gram.

SKORPI0

Lifer
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/...rams-700-terabytes-of-data-into-a-single-gram

Video --> http://vimeo.com/47615970#at=0

A bioengineer and geneticist at Harvard’s Wyss Institute have successfully stored 5.5 petabits of data — around 700 terabytes — in a single gram of DNA,
smashing the previous DNA data density record by a thousand times. The work, carried out by George Church and Sri Kosuri, basically treats DNA
as just another digital storage device. Instead of binary data being encoded as magnetic regions on a hard drive platter, strands of DNA that store 96 bits are synthesized,
with each of the bases (TGAC) representing a binary value (T and G = 1, A and C = 0). To read the data stored in DNA, you simply sequence it —
just as if you were sequencing the human genome — and convert each of the TGAC bases back into binary. To aid with sequencing, each strand of DNA has a
19-bit address block at the start (the red bits in the image below) — so a whole vat of DNA can be sequenced out of order,
and then sorted into usable data using the addresses.

coding-decoding-dna-storage-640x413.jpg


Scientists have been eyeing up DNA as a potential storage medium for a long time, for three very good reasons: It’s incredibly dense (you can store one bit per base,
and a base is only a few atoms large); it’s volumetric (beaker) rather than planar (hard disk); and it’s incredibly stable — where other bleeding-edge storage mediums
need to be kept in sub-zero vacuums, DNA can survive for hundreds of thousands of years in a box in your garage. It is only with recent advances in microfluidics and labs-on-a-chip
that synthesizing and sequencing DNA has become an everyday task, though. While it took years for the original Human Genome Project to analyze a single human genome
(some 3 billion DNA base pairs), modern lab equipment with microfluidic chips can do it in hours. Now this isn’t to say that Church and Kosuri’s DNA storage is fast — but it’s fast enough
for very-long-term archival.

J
ust think about it for a moment: One gram of DNA can store 700 terabytes of data. That’s 14,000 50-gigabyte Blu-ray discs… in a droplet of DNA that would fit on the tip
of your pinky. To store the same kind of data on hard drives — the densest storage medium in use today — you’d need 233 3TB drives, weighing a total of 151 kilos
.
In Church and Kosuri’s case, they have successfully stored around 700 kilobytes of data in DNA — Church’s latest book, in fact — and proceeded to make 70 billion copies (which they claim,
jokingly, makes it the best-selling book of all time!) totaling 44 petabytes of data stored.
I wonder if this is true and can be commercially viable in the near future. Imagine the endless possibilities. All this information literary right in your fingertips. :awe:
 
But, how would you replay this data? Would I have a DNA player? How would I connect it? And, will Monster have cables for it?
 
So considering I'm 175lbs, what's the liklihood that just by coincidence, there's a sequence of DNA in me that happens to translate to porn? More importantly, how do I access and watch it? :awe:
 
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/...rams-700-terabytes-of-data-into-a-single-gram

Video --> http://vimeo.com/47615970#at=0

I wonder if this is true and can be commercially viable in the near future. Imagine the endless possibilities. All this information literary right in your fingertips. :awe:

what would be the read/write speed? I could see read being as fast as regular HDs but how would you even write real time. Would you need a nutrient bath in you computer to keep the cells alive with your data? Forget to feed your computer and they die?
 
It will be quite a long time before this trickles down to consumers. Cost will be the key issue as always. The incredibly low cost per gigabyte of hard drives and optical discs is why they're still around even though flash storage is superior.
 
Hmmm...

There was speculation at one time that if aliens had visited, perhaps they would leave a message for us encoded in DNA so that we could read it when we were sufficiently advanced. People were thinking they would stick it into human junk DNA.

Hmmmm... what if they stuck that DNA strand some place where we might say "wtf?" - how about coelacanth? The "dinosaur fish" - a fish not thought to exist from long, long ago. Perhaps its DNA has encoded somewhere the secret to time travel.
 
Hmmm...

There was speculation at one time that if aliens had visited, perhaps they would leave a message for us encoded in DNA so that we could read it when we were sufficiently advanced. People were thinking they would stick it into human junk DNA.

Hmmmm... what if they stuck that DNA strand some place where we might say "wtf?" - how about coelacanth? The "dinosaur fish" - a fish not thought to exist from long, long ago. Perhaps its DNA has encoded somewhere the secret to time travel.

Wouldn't that assume that we would then have to decode said messages with their (the aliens') own version of a programing language, which we probably couldn't figure out?
 
Hmmm...

There was speculation at one time that if aliens had visited, perhaps they would leave a message for us encoded in DNA so that we could read it when we were sufficiently advanced. People were thinking they would stick it into human junk DNA.

Hmmmm... what if they stuck that DNA strand some place where we might say "wtf?" - how about coelacanth? The "dinosaur fish" - a fish not thought to exist from long, long ago. Perhaps its DNA has encoded somewhere the secret to time travel.

Unless it's strongly selected for, that information has degraded by a huge amount over the last thousands/millions of years.
 
It will be quite a long time before this trickles down to consumers. Cost will be the key issue as always. The incredibly low cost per gigabyte of hard drives and optical discs is why they're still around even though flash storage is superior.

For this technology there's also ridiculously long latency, and a whopping high error rate, over 0.1%.
 
Back
Top