Harry Shearer to leave Simpsons (beginning of the (overdue) end)

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
166
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
To those saying they can just replace him, it's not that easy. He voices multiple characters and it would be hard to find a single person who can do them all well.
Or, they could cast a different person for each voice. It's just a voice.
He's a voice, they can have him replaced tomorrow by somebody that will work for half the price and sound identical.
Half? I'd think that if they offered $1000 per episode per voice, they'd have people coming out of the woodwork to do it.

In a statement released Friday, the actor said, "I say, fine -- if pay cuts are what it will take to keep the show on the air, then cut my pay. In fact, to make it as easy as possible for Fox to keep new episodes of The Simpsons coming, I'm willing to let them cut my salary not just 45 percent but more than 70 percent -- down to half of what they said they would be willing to pay us. All I would ask in return is that I be allowed a small share of the eventual profits."
That's like asking for a HUGE raise. Incidentally, Shearer and most of the others have been receiving 400,000 PER EPISODE! for the past 7 or 8 years. Yeah, I don't think it would be hard to afford people to cover Flanders, Burns, and others. It's insane what they're getting just to be voices.
 

Newell Steamer

Diamond Member
Jan 27, 2014
6,894
8
0
Simpsons is the longest running animated TV show. 26 seasons. That is insane. And, as long as people are watching it, they will keep producing episodes. No matter what the armchair TV execs say.

Anyway, a leave was bound to happen. I am surprised it wasn't sooner and by more of the actors.
 

GagHalfrunt

Lifer
Apr 19, 2001
25,284
1,996
126
Or, they could cast a different person for each voice. It's just a voice.

Half? I'd think that if they offered $1000 per episode per voice, they'd have people coming out of the woodwork to do it.


That's like asking for a HUGE raise. Incidentally, Shearer and most of the others have been receiving 400,000 PER EPISODE! for the past 7 or 8 years. Yeah, I don't think it would be hard to afford people to cover Flanders, Burns, and others. It's insane what they're getting just to be voices.

Yeah, they make a fortune. The guy shows up, sits in a booth and reads lines. He doesn't even have to shower or put on pants to work. He can show up in pajamas with birds nesting in his beard and still do the job.

They're likely have to pay a little more than $1000. Union voiceover pay scale is something like $500 for the first hour and $100 per hour after that. So if they need an actor for 2 days it's like $2000. They might need 15 or 20 different voice actors to replace him as he does a buttload of voices and it would be hard to find one actor to cover them all. But pay 20 people $2000 a week and you're at $40,000 an episode, that's a tenth of what Shearer makes and he wants profit participation too? What as asshole. Hey Harry, you want a share of the profits? Create your own show and keep it on the air for 25+ years, let's see how that works out for you. And don't let the door hit you on the ass on the way out. Maybe you can do something with Jimmy Smits and Shelly Long.
 

gorcorps

aka Brandon
Jul 18, 2004
30,739
452
126
I thought they were on their last season, and then they renewed it for another two
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
66
91
This makes me sad.

And for the record, I wouldn't say it's in a long decline, it's in a roller coaster that happened to have its peak much earlier in the ride. The bottom, in my opinion, was somewhere around season 14 or 15. It stayed there for a little while, but it's been better since. This last few seasons have been pretty decent. It's still better than most of the garbage that's on TV, even if it's not as good as it used to be.

I agree. There are still great episodes of the Simpsons, and I almost always find it worth watching.

As for Shearer, the whole thing strikes me as very silly. He must work, at most, a few hours a week, for which he is paid a king's ransom. The idea of leaving because of time constraints and/or money makes zero sense to me.

If anyone is ever curious, Shearer did a really interesting interview on WTF a while back. He was actually a child actor and was on the Jack Benny show as a kid (I found this surprising since I wouldn't have thought he was a markedly cute kid). He is certainly a great talent and I wish him well whatever he decides to do.
 

Puppies04

Diamond Member
Apr 25, 2011
5,909
17
76
To those saying they can just replace him, it's not that easy. He voices multiple characters and it would be hard to find a single person who can do them all well.

Can you please explain why it has to be one person?
 

Imp

Lifer
Feb 8, 2000
18,828
184
106
Simpsons is the longest running animated TV show. 26 seasons. That is insane. And, as long as people are watching it, they will keep producing episodes. No matter what the armchair TV execs say.

Anyway, a leave was bound to happen. I am surprised it wasn't sooner and by more of the actors.

They don't even need people to watch it when it airs on Fox. It's so well syndicated -- and so easy to syndicated because it's comedy/family friendly-ish/ for adults and kids -- that each additional season is plain printing money.
 

88keys

Golden Member
Aug 24, 2012
1,854
12
81
I actually watched a few more recent episodes of the Simpsons and it has gotten better again. Although I still don't think it's quite up to par with the mid/late 90's Simpsons.

But that could just be the nostalgia factor.

I'd almost have to wonder whether they would have enough audio of his voice in the past 25 years to even need a replacement. But then again they've replaced iconic characters like Bugs Bunny and Donald Duck so I don't see why they couldn't replace him.
 

Deeko

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
30,213
11
81
I actually watched a few more recent episodes of the Simpsons and it has gotten better again. Although I still don't think it's quite up to par with the mid/late 90's Simpsons.

But that could just be the nostalgia factor.

I'd almost have to wonder whether they would have enough audio of his voice in the past 25 years to even need a replacement. But then again they've replaced iconic characters like Bugs Bunny and Donald Duck so I don't see why they couldn't replace him.

Like "Return of Chef" South Park episode?
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,166
16,591
136
I agree. There are still great episodes of the Simpsons, and I almost always find it worth watching.

As for Shearer, the whole thing strikes me as very silly. He must work, at most, a few hours a week, for which he is paid a king's ransom. The idea of leaving because of time constraints and/or money makes zero sense to me.

If anyone is ever curious, Shearer did a really interesting interview on WTF a while back. He was actually a child actor and was on the Jack Benny show as a kid (I found this surprising since I wouldn't have thought he was a markedly cute kid). He is certainly a great talent and I wish him well whatever he decides to do.

I think its simply because he has enough money and simply doesn't want to put those few hours a week in any longer. The profit sharing is him essentially saying giving up my free time costs that amount which he didn't expect them to offer.
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
I think its simply because he has enough money and simply doesn't want to put those few hours a week in any longer. The profit sharing is him essentially saying giving up my free time costs that amount which he didn't expect them to offer.

He must have stocked away over the years, I don't know the details but read somewhere he passed on 16 million or something.

Must be nice.
 

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,418
1,598
126
Interview with Al Jean which pretty much rips Harry's version to shreds. Wonder what his side is?

The Simpsons was renewed for two more seasons — and now Harry claims to be done from the series. What happened here?

I'm a little baffled. The other five [voice stars] signed on May 1 and we offered him the same contract everybody else got offered, but he didn't sign so we started reading like we were going to and [were] waiting to see if he wanted to come back or not. Then about a week ago TMZ somehow got ahold of a story that [an unnamed voice actor from the cast] wasn't returning. Then last night Harry tweeted something to the extent that he was leaving the show — implying he wasn't wanted — which isn't true. We made him an offer and we're once more saying, "Do you want to come back like everybody else and work hard and care about the show? Great." He said he wanted to do other projects, which makes no sense because we've always let the cast do all the other projects they want — they have great free time. So I don't really know what he's up to [or] what he's thinking. I hope he comes back. The other misinformation that has been spread is that it would jeopardize these two seasons we're doing up until 625 episodes. That's for sure a pickup from the network, and everybody else is pay-or-play — so we'll make those episodes. If he chooses not to come back, we'll recast. We will not kill his characters; that's one way to go. I'm sure there will be plusses and minuses with that and, at the moment, I'm hoping he comes back. But if he doesn't in a reasonable time, we'll have to do the other options.

What's the reasonable time?

It's a little vague because we have seven holdover [episodes already completed]. The new episodes featuring his characters that haven't been recorded by him don't air until November. So I would say we have the summer to figure it out. But you want to know. It's not a hard decision. You should know the money is not going to change; it's not going to be different from what the other cast members get. They're saying the terms are the same, so I think Harry knows if he wants to do it or he doesn't want to do it. I hope he does.

In terms of the salary, there's a CNN report circulating that he's walking away from $14 million.

That sounds right. It's a two-year guarantee — the same rate as the other cast: all shows produced. Which should be 44 times whatever the show [per episode] fee is.

Harry has feuded with the show in the past. Do you have any backups in place for all of his characters?

Seeing how we have always hoped he'd come back, no we don't have anybody where we go, "Oh, that's the new Burns, that's the new Flanders" or anything. There are so many talented voiceover actors that come to mind immediately. Somebody like Billy West or Maurice LaMarche (Futurama) or Tom Kenny (SpongeBob SquarePants). I'm sure since he leaked the story, we've already been contacted by really good people — really funny people who can do voices — so I'm sure we'll have a lot to look at. The show will go on, and I think it will be a great show one way or the other.

If the voice cast have the freedom to do other projects outside of The Simpsons, what's Harry upset about?

He lives in England. He does a radio show and a play about Nixon. I'm not trying to be argumentative but I have no idea what we're preventing him from doing. The time commitment for him is: there are 22 reads, which you can do via phone. One hour per phone. He can record via phone, doing more than one episode at once, and pick those up within an hour or two. So, if you do that math, I don't know. This is why I'm really baffled. He's saying it's not the money, and it can't be money because there's not going to be a different offer he's going to get. TMZ, [where] to be accurate, he wasn't being quoted — I don't know if it came from a representative of his or some other source — said something about a backend [of the profits], but that's not it. It can't be the availability to do other projects, and it isn't that the deal is different than his other cast members. I don't know. Honestly, if it was me, I would take the deal right now. I wouldn't be waiting one second. I'm not trying to be disingenuous — I wish him well — but I don't understand. I'm perplexed. I understand if, for example, somebody like [The Sopranos'] James Gandolfini said that this is such a stressful job; I'm working on a six-hour, six days a week, and I'm playing this horrible man and I'm exhausted. I understand that kind of person saying the job prevents them from other things, but I don't understand it in voiceover.

Read more 'The Simpsons' at 500: Untold Stories

The Simpsons producers are said to have the right of refusal on specific projects for the cast. Is that part of all of deals?

Not to my knowledge. We wouldn't want somebody doing the voice of one of our well-known characters on something else. We're protective of that, but if Harry wanted to do an animated feature where he wasn't using his Simpsons voices, my understanding is we'd say great, go ahead. Hank Azaria did do another animated feature, Anastasia, for Fox. Nancy Cartwright has done a great deal of animated work in television. Harry appeared in the movie Godzilla and his own movie Teddy Bear's Picnic. He's made documentaries. I guess what I'm saying is, I think this is a false [reason]. I wish somebody would ask him what he's talking about because I have no clue.

At this point, what's different about this negotiation than in years' past? It sounds like these deals don't really change too much.

No. A few years ago [producers] said — like they do to a lot of shows, not just the Simpsons — that the budget was high and revenues were down, which is true. So we cut the budget and that was different but other than that it's same. But the difference here is that we've always had a deadline, and then they've signed and gone on, and now we have one person who didn't sign but wants to say we fired him, I guess, but doesn't want to just pick up the phone and say I want the job.

At this point if he did pick up the phone and say he wants the job — but also wants X, Y and Z, does he have any wiggle room at this point?

But I don't know what X, Y and Z are, that's what I'm trying to say. If he said, "I want freedom to do stuff," he has it. If he wants a deal different than the cast, he can't get it. I don't know what else you could want with this job. It's pretty simple. If you really didn't want to do it then, yeah. I really don't understand it. There's nothing. There were a couple issues that we said, "You know what, let's not make a deal of it." We listed the issues. It's the same deal the other guys got. He can take it if he wants it. I mean, it's not open-ended forever.

If Harry is reading this, is there something you would like to say specifically to him?

Please call [executive producer] Jim Brooks and tell him what you want. And if you don't want to do this show, tell him, but explain what's on your mind. Will the show go on without him? It will.

If this is truly the way things end with Harry and The Simpsons, it’s a sad culmination to such a long relationship. Would you feel badly about it?

Life is so full … I was divorced and things don't always end the way you hope, but I feel we've done everything we can to keep him on this show. We have made it a terrific job that's really well paying. He's won an Emmy for it. He has gotten acclaim worldwide. He can live in another country. He can phone it in and do whatever else he wants. So I don't know what else. I kind of defy you to find a problem.

See more THR Goes Behind the Scenes at 'The Simpsons' Animation Studio

If this is his end with the series, which of his characters do you think would be the hardest to replace?

I don't even want to talk about that yet because that's at least an issue for next week, if not later. It'll be done. It's a different issue, [but] when Marcia Wallace died, we didn't bring her character back. But I can't feel like we should end the show where all these people work, all these animators, people who aren't necessarily in the public but have worked here for a long time, because one person doesn't want to accept a deal of that magnitude. I don't think it's right to end it. So I hope he takes it, but it wouldn't end it because he didn't I don't think that's a good reason.

Should this be the end of the line for Harry's tenure with this show, how do you see replacing his voice roles? You've gotten a lot of offers, but is the plan to keep all of his iconic characters?

Pretty much. We really don't know. I don't think one person would do exactly all of them. We'd see who could do what and we'd also have people who could not just do the characters but maybe do other funny things, too. But I think it would be a really wide open world because it's a great show and there's a lot of work for somebody who's good.

See more Meet the Cast of 'The Simpsons'

If you wind up replacing some of his characters — like Flanders and Mr. Burns — do you think viewers would be distracted by the new voices?

Of course it's a concern. People doubted when we went from ink-and-paint to digital to high-def. However you change in life, people fight at first. But no, I think they'd be fine. You know, there's a Simpsons ride at Universal Studios that Harry didn't do. He's not in it. He didn't want the deal that everybody else took. And people love it — and I've never heard anybody say they miss him. Similarly, it was a good deal that everybody else took and he didn't.

Why didn't he want to take it? Did he explain?

Part of the same mystery.

Do you think this opens the door for other cast? I know that they've signed for two more seasons but given the show's track record do you think that there's concern?

It's a really different issue. They are signed for a four-year contract [with] two-year options on Fox.

So at this point Fox has options for seasons 29 and 30?

Yes. Not only that but Harry would ostensibly lose that money if he turned this down. I want to stress that we'd really like him to come back. We're not forcing him out. I'm genuinely confused by what he's saying, and I hope he calls Jim.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/simpsons-harry-shearer-al-jean-795715
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,078
136
They could kill the show tonight and it would be just fine.

It was great in seasons 1-8. Seasons 9-11 were just OK. ANd it went downhill quickly after that.

Maybe its time everyone moved on.
 

MetalMat

Diamond Member
Jun 14, 2004
9,687
36
91
I quit watching the Simpsons on a regular basis a long long time ago but I do have to admit that the new episodes I watch every once in a blue moon still manage to get a few chuckles out out of me.
 

shabby

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,782
45
91
They could kill the show tonight and it would be just fine.

It was great in seasons 1-8. Seasons 9-11 were just OK. ANd it went downhill quickly after that.

Maybe its time everyone moved on.

When did they stop using the thick sharpie for the outline? I think that's when it went downhill :D
 

SKORPI0

Lifer
Jan 18, 2000
18,428
2,357
136
I wonder if they are paid by the number of characters they voice. Noted that Yardley Smith only voices Liza and Maggie Simpson (who doesn't talk at all), and that's it.
Wouldn't seen fair to the others if they are all paid the same rate.
 
Last edited:

GagHalfrunt

Lifer
Apr 19, 2001
25,284
1,996
126
I wonder if they are paid by the number of characters the voice. Noted that Yardley Smith only voices Liza and Maggie Simpson (who doesn't talk at all), and that's it. Wouldn't seen fair to the others if they are all paid the same rate.

The 6 main voice actors are all paid the same. Yeardley Smith must have one hell of an agent. She does one voice and it's not even all that different from her own speaking voice. She's lightyears behind Castellaneta, Shearer and Azaria in talent and unlike the others, she could be replaced by a single person. Why are they paying her almost $7 million a year? They could get someone to sound 99.9999% the same for $100,000 which would still be a generous salary way over union scale.