Harry Reid - we can not have people break the law and just walk away

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,266
126
They said there are 1600 ranchers out in those areas who all pay fees, and or just keep their cattle on their land fenced in. So yea, this guy is the only one not abiding by the law...lol

Oh and I might add this Bundy rancher keeps saying he doesn't recognize our federal government and only recognizes Nevada law.

He may be completely in the wrong, although that's not my point. It's the hypocrisy of a system who preaches, but is glad to bend the choirboy over while giving mass.
 

Oldgamer

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,280
1
0
When are we going to see an armed response to google and apple suppressing tech wages?

Maybe an armed response to wall street fleecing main street? When are we going to see a single arrest associated with the collapse of 2008?

I want to see a wall street CEO being tazed until blood comes from his chest.

part of the reason for the armed response is that the rancher and his family told them that they would arm themselves and would also call out for others to come join them in a stand off. Seriously though, I am starting to think you have some cognitive issues. You keep vacillating between various topics trying to deflect or skew or create some kind of canard issue or divert facts.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,503
50,655
136
He may be completely in the wrong, although that's not my point. It's the hypocrisy of a system who preaches, but is glad to bend the choirboy over while giving mass.

I'm kind of baffled as to why you are complaining about prioritized enforcement. Every single law enforcement agency since the beginning of time has done this.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Oh, I also noticed you selected MMJ. In case you haven't noticed this latest change in CO wasn't about that, but access to the general public with no reason whatsoever. Apparently they have more testicular fortitude than you, Obama, Reid, and both Parties. Too bad they had to do this in the face of your pander above all approach.

MMJ at the state level exists in violation of federal law, the same statutes dealing with Recreational MJ. Starting from "Enforce the Law!" you're now trying to claim that the law isn't what it is, even as you claim to be for legalization while falsely characterizing it as being done for "no reason whatsoever".

The naked hypocrisy & doublespeak in that is obvious, as is the usual Hate-um Obama! agenda.

I live in CO, provide financial support for the legalization effort, and voted for A64 quite emphatically.
 
Last edited:

Texashiker

Lifer
Dec 18, 2010
18,811
197
106
Seriously though, I am starting to think you have some cognitive issues. You keep vacillating between various topics trying to deflect or skew or create some kind of canard issue or divert facts.

Reid said the government can not allow people to break the law and simply walk away.

Ok, lets see fair justice.

If the BLM is going to send out armed thugs, when are we going to see an armed response to the collapse of 2008?

If the BLM is going to taze someone, lets see a wall street CEO tazed.

Does google have a security force? When can we expect to see an armed response to wage fixing?

If reid wants to talk about upholding the law, lets talk about it.

Lets talk about detaining people forever.

Lets talk about killing children with drone strikes.

Lets talk about killing US citizens without due process.

Everything the government has done and all the laws they have ignored, and reid wants to make a big deal out of cattle?
 
Last edited:

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,266
126
I'm kind of baffled as to why you are complaining about prioritized enforcement. Every single law enforcement agency since the beginning of time has done this.

I'm actually complaining about Harry Reid and his statements, and gave examples of where enormous disparities of enforcement exist. I never disagreed with you in this regard. If you read my past statements you might have understood that I don't want every jot and tittle enforced equally in all cases. I really have no problem with the cop who takes the joint and says "get the hell out of here". On the contrary I want there to be no legal basis for that at all.

Getting back to my point though. I don't like Reid playing the sincere righteous hypocrite and I'm calling him out on that basis.