- Aug 21, 2002
- 18,368
- 11
- 81
Back in the mid 90's I remember buying a 12 GB Quantum Bigfoot drive. It was the largest IDE drive available at the time, but it wasn't even close to being the fastest. There were 7200 RPM drives showing up at the time I believe, and this was a 4000 RPM drive IIRC. 5400 RPM drives were mainstream. It was slow as molases in January, but it had a lot of space.
My question is, why can't we have drives like that now?
Why doesn't a company manufacture HUGE but slow drives to use as backup devices. It's my understanding that if they decrease the spindle speed, it's A LOT easier to increase the data density. So... what's stopping someone from making a 4000 RPM (or maybe even 3200 RPM), 2 MB cache (or maybe even 1 MB), 1 TB hard drive? No demand? Or does the spindle speed not allow for THAT much of an increase in data density?
I don't know about you... but I think it would be nice to be able to buy a hard drive with high capacity that's slow to use for backups, or just storing huge amounts of data that you don't use often. I don't need 50 MB/s average data transfer rates and 8ms access times for a drive ONLY used to backup data I can't afford to lose. I can't justify spending $200 for a drive to backup my data, and have no room for when I accumulate more data that I need to back up. I could justify $200 for say, a 500 GB backup drive... or $300 for a 1 TB backup drive... something like that.
My question is, why can't we have drives like that now?
Why doesn't a company manufacture HUGE but slow drives to use as backup devices. It's my understanding that if they decrease the spindle speed, it's A LOT easier to increase the data density. So... what's stopping someone from making a 4000 RPM (or maybe even 3200 RPM), 2 MB cache (or maybe even 1 MB), 1 TB hard drive? No demand? Or does the spindle speed not allow for THAT much of an increase in data density?
I don't know about you... but I think it would be nice to be able to buy a hard drive with high capacity that's slow to use for backups, or just storing huge amounts of data that you don't use often. I don't need 50 MB/s average data transfer rates and 8ms access times for a drive ONLY used to backup data I can't afford to lose. I can't justify spending $200 for a drive to backup my data, and have no room for when I accumulate more data that I need to back up. I could justify $200 for say, a 500 GB backup drive... or $300 for a 1 TB backup drive... something like that.