- Sep 23, 2004
- 25
- 0
- 0
Well here goes... i posted this here about week ago, cuz i was told there were a lot of knowledgeable people on here and I got diddly squat responses. As in ZERO.... So i'm posting this in hopes them "knowledgeable" peeps are still here.
I'm Currently dual-booting Win98/ W2K on a 40 GB HDD and plan to add a 3rd OS - Mandrake 9.1.
I bought a new 200 GB HDD. (Plan on using NTFS)
Have an older 10 GB salvaged from an older PC.
My initial thought was to put each OS on their own separate HDDs (since I have 3 HDDs available). But now i'm debating what I want to do. With so much space available, I want to be smart and make efficient use of the 3 HDDs.
My other option was to use the 200 GB as primary and load both Windows OSes on it. Then I could use the small 10 Gigger for my Mandrake OS and use the original 40 Gigger for images and backups.
What do y'all think about that?
As for images and back ups, would it be better to save it on the same HDD as the OS is loaded on or should I back it up to a separate HDD?
I'm Currently dual-booting Win98/ W2K on a 40 GB HDD and plan to add a 3rd OS - Mandrake 9.1.
I bought a new 200 GB HDD. (Plan on using NTFS)
Have an older 10 GB salvaged from an older PC.
My initial thought was to put each OS on their own separate HDDs (since I have 3 HDDs available). But now i'm debating what I want to do. With so much space available, I want to be smart and make efficient use of the 3 HDDs.
My other option was to use the 200 GB as primary and load both Windows OSes on it. Then I could use the small 10 Gigger for my Mandrake OS and use the original 40 Gigger for images and backups.
What do y'all think about that?
As for images and back ups, would it be better to save it on the same HDD as the OS is loaded on or should I back it up to a separate HDD?