- Dec 4, 2004
- 111
- 0
- 0
Title is self explanatory
Does the 16mb cache vs 32mb cache really improve the performence of an hard drive or is it just a marketing gimmick ? I currently have a 250gig 16mb cache Seagate Hard drive and i plan to upgrade to a 500 gig and i plan to go with Western Digital since i found the Seagates a bit loud for my tastes. The thing is , WD don't have a 32mb 500 gig model , only Seagate does.
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 3.5IN 500GB SATA2 8.5MS 7200RPM 32MB Cache NCQ Hard Drive 92$ CAN
vs
Western Digital Caviar SE16 640GB SATA2 7200RPM 16MB Hard Drive 3YR MFR Warranty
97$ CAN
I have 140 more gig on the WD for only 5$ more but the Seagate is 32mb. The WD really interest me but if you guys tell me that i would really see an performence gain with the Seagate ill go with it.
For the record , i didn't notice much difference between my old Maxtor 120 gig with 8mb vs my Seagate 250 gig with 16mb but maybe i would really see one with a 32mb HD ?
Does the 16mb cache vs 32mb cache really improve the performence of an hard drive or is it just a marketing gimmick ? I currently have a 250gig 16mb cache Seagate Hard drive and i plan to upgrade to a 500 gig and i plan to go with Western Digital since i found the Seagates a bit loud for my tastes. The thing is , WD don't have a 32mb 500 gig model , only Seagate does.
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 3.5IN 500GB SATA2 8.5MS 7200RPM 32MB Cache NCQ Hard Drive 92$ CAN
vs
Western Digital Caviar SE16 640GB SATA2 7200RPM 16MB Hard Drive 3YR MFR Warranty
97$ CAN
I have 140 more gig on the WD for only 5$ more but the Seagate is 32mb. The WD really interest me but if you guys tell me that i would really see an performence gain with the Seagate ill go with it.
For the record , i didn't notice much difference between my old Maxtor 120 gig with 8mb vs my Seagate 250 gig with 16mb but maybe i would really see one with a 32mb HD ?