bittermann
Member
- Mar 5, 2004
- 159
- 0
- 0
Who gives a f*ck about what that greasy, hairy ape alcoholic thinks? Singers/entertainers getting involved in politics are only good for a laughs anyway....
If you ask a drunk Country & Western, good ole boy, a question about politics, expect him to tell you! If you dont want to hear it, dont ask! This is real America where we dont apolagized for being an American. If people cant handle the truth, they should crawl back into their communist hell hole.
Looks to me like he was just trying to illustrate the width of the divide between the President's and the Speaker's positions. That said I don't think he could have used a poorer analogy or fumbled that one any worse than he did. I mean really That is a Bidenesque faux paux of the first order. Watch out Joe Hank Jr is out to steal your thunder LOL! Seriouisly though I hope he doesn't embarass himself by actually running for that senate seat in Tenn.
Telling it like it is huh... do you know how idiotic republicans look to historians every day? It's amazing the way current figures are compared to people like Stalin and Hitler by people who have absolutely ZERO clue on who these people were. All you have to do is read some books and you might get the fact that Hitler had a complete hatred for democrats and communists. Why do you think the Social Democrat Party "SPD" was dissolved? Why do you think Hitler double crossed Stalin and invaded? Do you n00bs convince yourself it was for the oil in the Caucasus and that was it?Good 'ole Hank. Telling it like it is. Yes brother, all mah rowdy friends are standing right next to you in support.
If you ask a drunk Country & Western, good ole boy, a question about politics, expect him to tell you! If you dont want to hear it, dont ask! This is real America where we dont apolagized for being an American. If people cant handle the truth, they should crawl back into their communist hell hole.
Those comparisons were asinine! Hitler was a brilliant orator and a decorated combat veteran. Bush was neither.
Both started hugely expensive and unnecessary wars, though. But Hitler was far more honest about his motivations: Lebensraum! Deutschland Uber Alles!
![]()
LOL I don't think MNF is the "single source" of Williams' money. He's had a bazillion hits and his fan base isn't likely to have a problem with this analogy.He must be following the Gilbert Godfrey career path of throwing away the single source of your money in one brainless stupid moment.
Yep. Good luck getting any sanity going...
We won't mention all of the Bush/Hitler comparisons, since no one cared about them...
Dang it, Hank. Stop trying to fool all of us into thinking Obama is the modern day Hitler.
We already know he is in fact the Anti-Christ.
Looks to me like he was just trying to illustrate the width of the divide between the President's and the Speaker's positions. That said I don't think he could have used a poorer analogy or fumbled that one any worse than he did. I mean really That is a Bidenesque faux paux of the first order. Watch out Joe Hank Jr is out to steal your thunder LOL! Seriouisly though I hope he doesn't embarass himself by actually running for that senate seat in Tenn.
Its because of stuff like this, is the reason I am not a republican today.
so who is surprised the obama cheer leaders are exercising censorship??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlTxGHn4sH4It's not censorship, it's something you no doubt love (at least in theory): free market capitalism. ABC isn't telling Hank Williams he can't have these opinions or voice them, it's saying it doesn't want to be burdened with the fallout associated with his controversial statements. It also wasn't censorship when the same network fired Bill Maher for his own controversial statements about 9/11 (a firing you probably applauded if you were even aware of it).
I am endlessly amused by the fact that so many conservative voices (a la Sarah Palin and her tweets about the Westboro Baptist Church and Dr. Laura) don't seem to understand the First Amendment or even what censorship means.
What is the source of the quote in your sig? Is this actually something the President said? I would think not, since I can't find it anywhere other than being used as a sig for conservative posters (mostly you) on forums, but one never knows.
Nothing like a good distraction to keep attention off obama's presidency.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlTxGHn4sH4
Google's hard, let's bake cookies!
The full quote is "Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket." This is the same cap and trade system Obama threatened to implement by executive order via the EPA, and in fact the EPA is even now implementing a much reduced version (and being sued from both sides, from the right for implementing it at all outside of Congressional authority and from the left for not immediately implementing its full, capitalism-crushing, America-destroying scope.)
And you guys don't understand why business fears this guy.
And again, I do agree this isn't censorship. It's consequences, same as the Dixie Chicks no longer being able to be played on country music stations after their little slur in Europe. Both Williams and the Dixie Twits are free to say whatever they choose, as long as they are prepared to take the consequences.
Cap and trade would "skyrocket" the cost of electricity and any other use of fossil fuels or other carbon-producing energy generation. This includes gasoline, diesel, natural gas, propane, methane, waste burning . . . Factcheck's amusing little spin is that Obama will rebate the extra cost to consumers so that the cost of the taxes won't fall on consumers. Yet Obama's 2010 budget proposal used that money to fund energy investments (<cough> Solyndra) as well as "help consumers". Putting aside the insanity that government can drive up the cost of energy and then pay the consumer so he feels no pain, even by fuzzy liberal logic you can't do both with the same dollars. At best Obama could reimburse consumers for their direct energy costs while forcing them to pay for the increased costs of everything else they buy - and thereby increasing anger at the "greedy businesses" who jacked up their prices. In the end, the consumer pays for everything, including government.I did Google the quote, and the reason I didn't find anything is interesting in that the real quote is actually quite different from the one in LGBT's sig, as is the context. LGBT's sig implies the President was talking about the cost of fossil fuels, not electricity, when in fact he was talking about the fact that American households would pay more for electricity under cap and trade (a factoid that the GOP, in typically hysterical fashion, then wildly exaggerated - http://www.factcheck.org/2009/05/cap-and-trade-cost-inflation/).
I heard it on the radio this morning, he sounded drunk.
