Halliburton's cementing of Deepwater Horizon's drill may have caused blowout

shira

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
9,500
6
81
Circumstantial evidence indicates that Halliburton - which cemented the Deepwater Horizon's drill into place below the water only 20 hours before the blowout occurred - may be the proximal cause of the catastrophe.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/greenspace/2010/04/gulf-oil-spill-the-halliburton-connection.html

Cementing a deep-water drilling operation is a process fraught with danger. A 2007 study by the U.S. Minerals Management Service found that cementing was the single most important factor in 18 of 39 well blowouts in the Gulf of Mexico over a 14-year period -- more than equipment malfunction. Halliburton has been accused of a poor cement job in the case of a major blowout in the Timor Sea off Australia last August. An investigation is underway.

According to experts cited in Friday's Wall St. Journal, the timing of last week's cement job in relation to the explosion -- only 20 hours beforehand, and the history of cement problems in other blowouts "point to it as a possible culprit." Robert MacKenzie, managing director of energy and natural resources at FBR Capital Markets and a former cementing engineer, told the Journal, "The initial likely cause of gas coming to the surface had something to do with the cement."

In its statement, the company said, "Halliburton originated oilfield cementing and leads the world in effective, efficient delivery of zonal isolation and engineering for the life of the well, conducting thousands of successful well cementing jobs each year."

The company, which was once headed by former Vice President Dick Cheney, has been in the media spotlight before -- under under fire in recent years for its operations as a private contractor in Iraq.

Clearly, the oil industry should be even more de-regulated, to allow them to innovate exciting new catastrophes for the rest of us. And lest anyone doubt the value of oil spills, just consider what a boom for the environmental clean-up industry the Deepwater Horizon incident will represent.

Drill, baby, drill!
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
If true has there ever been a more person-friendly organization in the history of mankind?
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
If they caused the problem, they should have to pay for the entire cleanup and damages. Liquidate them if necessary.
 

XZeroII

Lifer
Jun 30, 2001
12,572
0
0
If they caused the problem, they should have to pay for the entire cleanup and damages. Liquidate them if necessary.

Ok. Let's go with that for a second since you've clearly thought this through. Which other company should do the cementing? Which other company should put out the oil rig fires? I mean, these companies must be a dime a dozen.
 
Dec 26, 2007
11,782
2
76
Ok. Let's go with that for a second since you've clearly thought this through. Which other company should do the cementing? Which other company should put out the oil rig fires? I mean, these companies must be a dime a dozen.

He has a point about them being the ones fined.
 

Patranus

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2007
9,280
0
0
Halliburton killed JFK, faked the moon landing, and invented AIDS to kill the black man, didn't you get the memo?
 
Last edited:

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
Ok. Let's go with that for a second since you've clearly thought this through. Which other company should do the cementing? Which other company should put out the oil rig fires? I mean, these companies must be a dime a dozen.

Are you saying that all the human beings out there that know how to do such things would go work at mcdonalds if halliburton failed?
 

RedCOMET

Platinum Member
Jul 8, 2002
2,836
0
0
Are you saying that all the human beings out there that know how to do such things would go work at mcdonalds if halliburton failed?

No, they work work for Schlumberger or BJs. They both do Offshore cementing, as well as land work. In fact most of the rigs I have worked on, have Schlumberger Cementers. On the rig i currently work, one of the Schlumberger Cementers started out in the oil field working for Halliburton up in Oklahoma.


http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/gree...onnection.html

According to experts cited in Friday's Wall St. Journal, the timing of last week's cement job in relation to the explosion -- only 20 hours beforehand, and the history of cement problems in other blowouts "point to it as a possible culprit." Robert MacKenzie, managing director of energy and natural resources at FBR Capital Markets and a former cementing engineer, told the Journal, "The initial likely cause of gas coming to the surface had something to do with the cement."


The cementing operation might have been an contributing factor of gas being being in the hole but also its what happened before the casing the job that is equally important.

Normal SOP is to finish drilling 100+ feet past the lowest zone they want to produce and in usually in a non-porous rock such as shale. Next, they circulate the hole clean of cuttings & gas and ensure that the well is static. Short trip to the casing shoe, trip to bottom and then circulate the hole clean some more. Then trip out of the hole.

Rig up casing equipment and run in the hole with casing. While setting casing on bottom, normal SOP is to circulate bottoms up and ensure that there is very little to no gas in the whole. If there is still a high amount of gas the mudweight can be increased to keep the gas low. This can happen before they trip out of the hole or while circualting on bottom with casing. Then Cement, Disconnect the landing Drill pipe from the casing and circulate bottoms up to get any gas out, and again ensure the well is static.

It will be interesting to found out what was done to prepare the hole prior to the cement operation.

http://rigzone.com/news/article.asp?a_id=92021

Halliburton had completed the cementing of the final production casing string in accordance with the well design approximately 20 hours prior to the incident. The cement slurry design was consistent with that utilized in other similar applications. In accordance with accepted industry practice approved by our customers, tests demonstrating the integrity of the production casing string were completed.

I wonder if that means they did a casing pressure test, or something to ensure that the cement and casing was holding. I hope that also mean the casing hanger was properly set and sealed. If gas came up the back side of the casing and the casing hanging was not properly set and sealed, then that not on Halliburton cementers. That is the rig and ultimately the company that BP hired to provide the casing hanger.


There are a lot of causes and factors that still need to be investigated. The cement job is just one of the many pieces to the puzzle that need to be explored. But lets not be judge and executioner until the investigation is over
 

Narmer

Diamond Member
Aug 27, 2006
5,292
0
0
Isn't this the same company that relocated to the Middle East? The government should run wild on their ass. BP too.
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
I have to agree with RedComet, there is no sense in making premature conclusions before the investigation even starts. And if nothing else, we can pretty well bet there will be a complete investigation.

What worries me is that there may not be clear beyond a reasonable doubt results after the investigation.
 

Schadenfroh

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2003
38,416
4
0
Isn't this the same company that relocated to the Middle East?

They have headquarters in Dubai and Houston. They are still incorporated in the US. Their CEO works out of the Dubai office, but he is an American.

I agree with LL, no need to jump to conclusions and start playing the blame game until we have something definitive.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,715
6,266
126
Assuming it's all Cheney's..err I mane Haliburton's fault, you still have to accept that sometimes Engineering/Construction is going to fail. As such an Investigation should focus more on the Why rather than the Who. Why allows the adoption of New Procedure and Regulation to avoid similar events in the future. Who just finds someone to Blame without effectively preventing it from happening again.
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Clearly, the oil industry should be even more de-regulated, to allow them to innovate exciting new catastrophes for the rest of us. And lest anyone doubt the value of oil spills, just consider what a boom for the environmental clean-up industry the Deepwater Horizon incident will represent.

Drill, baby, drill!

You, being one of the mega-"progressives" of the forum, first are posting this only because it gives negative press to Halliburton which you hope will reflect even more negatively on Cheney then Bush then all of Republicans, you know it I know it everyone else here knows it. And you are also basing your judgment on a false assumption that the government knows oil drilling better than private industry, as if more regulations would have conclusively prevented this accident.
 

RedCOMET

Platinum Member
Jul 8, 2002
2,836
0
0
I have to agree with RedComet, there is no sense in making premature conclusions before the investigation even starts. And if nothing else, we can pretty well bet there will be a complete investigation.

What worries me is that there may not be clear beyond a reasonable doubt results after the investigation.

Schadenfroh, and Lemon Law...Exactly. let the govt investigators do their thing. I also agree with what Lemon Law wrote ( the bolded section).
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Yes, let's follow Shira's recommendation and create larger government. Let's create a new agency to oversee and regulate oil drilling. Then in due time, the government regulators will be sitting at their computers watching porn while the next oil rig explodes.

Hooray, government regulation hath saved the universe!
 

Danube

Banned
Dec 10, 2009
613
0
0
Maybe the US custom of driving drilling way offshore led to the accident. Drilling on land or on the shelf in shallower water has less hazards then trying to cement a well a mile underwater.
 

dammitgibs

Senior member
Jan 31, 2009
477
0
0
Deepwater Horizon was an inside job! Anyone familiar with physics knows that fire can't melt a rig made out of steel
 

Sclamoz

Guest
Sep 9, 2009
975
0
0
Yes, let's follow Shira's recommendation and create larger government. Let's create a new agency to oversee and regulate oil drilling. Then in due time, the government regulators will be sitting at their computers watching porn while the next oil rig explodes.

Hooray, government regulation hath saved the universe!

You're 100% correct. Why expand government and taxes for something the private sector can take care of? That is assuming they will...


The oil rig, the mine explosion, Goldman Sachs/Lehman Brothers/Bernie Madoff etc. all just isolated incidents that we can feel safe won't happen again thanks to the free market! No sense getting the government involved.
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
Maybe the US custom of driving drilling way offshore led to the accident. Drilling on land or on the shelf in shallower water has less hazards then trying to cement a well a mile underwater.
Next thing you'll be telling us that the Massey mine explosion was because mine companies aren't allowed to mine the other coal-rich regions of the US.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
You're 100% correct. Why expand government and taxes for something the private sector can take care of? That is assuming they will...


The oil rig, the mine explosion, Goldman Sachs/Lehman Brothers/Bernie Madoff etc. all just isolated incidents that we can feel safe won't happen again thanks to the free market! No sense getting the government involved.

The financial industry is regulated. The govt was asleep at the wheel or watching pr0n. Mines have safety regulation. The govt gives out fines and that is it. And I am assuming the rigs all have regulation on them with regards to safety.

The govt is involved and these things still happen. So i dont know what you are expecting out of govt. Clearly it cant stop catastrophe.
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
You're 100% correct. Why expand government and taxes for something the private sector can take care of? That is assuming they will...

The oil rig, the mine explosion, Goldman Sachs/Lehman Brothers/Bernie Madoff etc. all just isolated incidents that we can feel safe won't happen again thanks to the free market! No sense getting the government involved.
So, it's your contention that a bigger Government can protect us from accidents and/or human error?

I'm sure you're right...

I stubbed my toe yesterday on an uneven sidewalk and it really REALLY hurts... damnit, where was the Gubment when I needed 'em?! :rolleyes:
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
Ok. Let's go with that for a second since you've clearly thought this through. Which other company should do the cementing? Which other company should put out the oil rig fires? I mean, these companies must be a dime a dozen.

The company that buys Halliburton's assets and businesses in liquidation.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
So, it's your contention that a bigger Government can protect us from accidents and/or human error?
I don't think he said that.

Unless it's ultimately found that this was a freak accident with no reasonable way to prevent it, we DO need to see more gov regulation here. You cannot have any private entity doing things in the public space that could cause incredible damage for which it lacks the resources to wholly make right. Just as I cannot drag race on highways and simply promise that if I make a mistake I'll pay for it. What if I cannot pay for it?