Originally posted by: Brian48
Having worked for a while in an IT corporate environment where the company stocks meant everything, I've have a suspicious eye about things like this. It would not really help Valve to lie about a leak in the source code. In fact, it would (and it HAS) hurt the company stock much more so than anything else that can be stolen from them. If a company really needed to the extra development time, they would have come up with a much better excuse. God know 3D Realms has been dealing with this issue with their Duke Nukem (taking) Forever project.
I'm not surprised that a "retractive" story like this would surface just as the stocks are starting to drop and they DID the day leak was announced. Not that any other excuse wouldn't effect the stocks, it's just that source code is extremely precious to any software company. Once it's out, it could literally destroy the company if a competitor got a hold of it. Wallstreet traders take note of this type of info VERY seriously, whether it's validated or not. I don't think Valve would be this stupid and now they're trying to cover up the damage.
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
We know nothing about when the release will be until VALVe speaks again.
ChefJoe - That particular "hacker" quote is bunk, unfortunately.
- M4H
Originally posted by: draggoon01
how do you know the hacker's accusations are wrong? people who have the demo are claiming that parts of it give evidence that HL2 was no where near a final build in september. in fact some say the enemy AI that's been demonstrated was all scripted and not actual AI code. from the way valve/gabe has been stringing fans along to build hype and waiting a week before to announce a delay makes them lose some credibility.
where's the benchmark even? remember that? why would there be reason to delay it?
also the hacker seems to have tons of stuff from valve. not just source and the alpha, but also stuff from team fortress 2, condition zero, which has been released by him, giving him more credibility.
my question is, if the claims are true and HL2 was never as complete as claimed by valve, how justified were they in bashing nvidia for all this time?
Originally posted by: draggoon01
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
We know nothing about when the release will be until VALVe speaks again.
ChefJoe - That particular "hacker" quote is bunk, unfortunately.
- M4H
how do you know the hacker's accusations are wrong? people who have the demo are claiming that parts of it give evidence that HL2 was no where near a final build in september. in fact some say the enemy AI that's been demonstrated was all scripted and not actual AI code. from the way valve/gabe has been stringing fans along to build hype and waiting a week before to announce a delay makes them lose some credibility.
where's the benchmark even? remember that? why would there be reason to delay it?
also the hacker seems to have tons of stuff from valve. not just source and the alpha, but also stuff from team fortress 2, condition zero, which has been released by him, giving him more credibility.
my question is, if the claims are true and HL2 was never as complete as claimed by valve, how justified were they in bashing nvidia for all this time?
Originally posted by: AmdInside
Well, I don't know how much more there was to be done with Half Life 2 however there is no reason why the source code leak should have caused the game to be delayed until April. No way. One month is normal. I really think it that Half Life 2 was far from being completed.