Hackers remotely kill Jeep on Highway

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rustican

Member
Feb 7, 2005
120
0
76
Article: http://www.wired.com/2015/07/hackers-remotely-kill-jeep-highway/

As the two hackers remotely toyed with the air-conditioning, radio, and windshield wipers, I mentally congratulated myself on my courage under pressure. That’s when they cut the transmission.

Immediately my accelerator stopped working. As I frantically pressed the pedal and watched the RPMs climb, the Jeep lost half its speed, then slowed to a crawl. This occurred just as I reached a long overpass, with no shoulder to offer an escape. The experiment had ceased to be fun.

...

All of this is possible only because Chrysler, like practically all carmakers, is doing its best to turn the modern automobile into a smartphone. Uconnect, an Internet-connected computer feature in hundreds of thousands of Fiat Chrysler cars, SUVs, and trucks, controls the vehicle’s entertainment and navigation, enables phone calls, and even offers a Wi-Fi hot spot. And thanks to one vulnerable element, which Miller and Valasek won’t identify until their Black Hat talk, Uconnect’s cellular connection also lets anyone who knows the car’s IP address gain access from anywhere in the country. “From an attacker’s perspective, it’s a super nice vulnerability,” Miller says.

...

Unfortunately, Chrysler’s patch must be manually implemented via a USB stick or by a dealership mechanic. (Download the update here.) That means many—if not most—of the vulnerable Jeeps will likely stay vulnerable.

Interesting article. New way to car jack people. Auto makers will need to start pushing patches OTA like Tesla does if they want to keep cramming tech into their cars.
 
Last edited:

Ferzerp

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
6,438
107
106
It would be prudent if you had an affected Chrysler vehicle to disconnect the antenna for the cellular connection immediately. Additionally, all these devices should be blacklisted by Sprint and individually removed from the blacklist as they're patched.

The patch should be a recall, as well. They already have one available.
 
Last edited:

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,585
985
126
Wrong forum. :)

That's crazy- you'd think there would be some significant authentication required to gain access of a vehicle...

I think you have waaay too much faith in the people who design these systems. :D
 

KentState

Diamond Member
Oct 19, 2001
8,397
393
126
Fortunately it's Sprint so the odds of the system getting a signal are slim.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
I thought the CAN bus was supposed to be kept totally separate from all the entertainment crap getting shoved into cars? Hell, if anything will keep autocars from taking off, it's security holes.
 

Ferzerp

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
6,438
107
106
I thought the CAN bus was supposed to be kept totally separate from all the entertainment crap getting shoved into cars? Hell, if anything will keep autocars from taking off, it's security holes.

Great idea, but then you have forced connectivity to keep abreast of whether the car is in gear and in motion under its own power because we apparently need nannies and can't have people watch DVDs when the car is in motion, or put in GPS addresses in motion unless the passenger seat is occupied and all that goes out the window.
 

SparkyJJO

Lifer
May 16, 2002
13,357
7
81
Yeah, screw this "always connected" crap on vehicles. Although I suppose if you knew how to hack your own car it would be an easy way to stop a thief from driving away in it :p
 

Auric

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 1999
9,591
2
71
I thought the CAN bus was supposed to be kept totally separate from all the entertainment crap getting shoved into cars? Hell, if anything will keep autocars from taking off, it's security holes.

Autocars? Car is already short for autocar which in turn is short for automatic-carriage. So what you mean is driverless car, or robocar.
 

SketchMaster

Diamond Member
Feb 23, 2005
3,100
149
116
I thought the CAN bus was supposed to be kept totally separate from all the entertainment crap getting shoved into cars? Hell, if anything will keep autocars from taking off, it's security holes.

Too lazy to google it, but I think Ford made damn sure the ECU was completely separate from the infotainment system on 2012+ models for this very reason.

Edit: Nope, sounds like Ford may have made the same assumptions as Chrysler - http://www.edmunds.com/car-technology/can-your-car-be-hacked.html
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.