Gym Jordan goes to NYC to dump on DA Bragg about crime, but it backfired.

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,539
2,236
126
I think the House subpoena is valid and he should honor it. First, because it’s the right thing to do. Second, having him testify is highly likely to backfire on the republicans as presumably what he is going to testify about is that Trump is a huge criminal who should be in prison.
Why in the world give Trump's legal team a free advance walk through of the prosecution's case?

This subpoena should be addressed the same way Jan 6th committee subpoenas were handled by the GOP. Refuse and stonewall to the hilt. Especially in this purely political show trial the GOP Congress buffoons have planned. Why don't those clowns start actually do something positive in the USA's interests for a change?
 

dlerious

Golden Member
Mar 4, 2004
1,671
673
136
Wait what? NAFTA did not move factories to China, the capitalists did.
I thought it was PUBLIC LAW 106–286—OCT. 10, 2000 that started the ball rolling with China getting in to the WTO - signed by Bill Clinton.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
82,175
44,947
136
I thought it was PUBLIC LAW 106–286—OCT. 10, 2000 that started the ball rolling with China getting in to the WTO - signed by Bill Clinton.
Don’t you think it’s a strange idea to deliberately manufacture things less efficiently as some sort of jobs program? Free trade is one of the greatest things the world has ever seen.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
93,777
14,335
126
I thought it was PUBLIC LAW 106–286—OCT. 10, 2000 that started the ball rolling with China getting in to the WTO - signed by Bill Clinton.


Neither Clinton nor NAFTA had anything to do with it. China made itself attractive to Capitalists and guess what they went all in. Now they are shifting to SE Asia in pursuit of lower costs. It's what Capitalists do.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,432
4,949
136


Clinton nor NAFTA had nothing to do with it. China made itself attractive to Capitalists and guess what they went all in. Now they are shifting to SE Asia in pursuit of lower costs. It's what Capitalists do.
Guess he missed this:

 

Indus

Diamond Member
May 11, 2002
8,929
5,655
136
Some of you won't like this but this is also a thing here in a very blue city and suburbs..

The dems lost 4 congressional seats from this area because people are tired of lawlessness.

It's not like the GOP has the answer but we're just tired of local dems doing nothing with constant lawlessness all around by thugs

 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
82,175
44,947
136
Some of you won't like this but this is also a thing here in a very blue city and suburbs..

The dems lost 4 congressional seats from this area because people are tired of lawlessness.

It's not like the GOP has the answer but we're just tired of local dems doing nothing with constant lawlessness all around by thugs

You may not like this either but the reason for the lawlessness is primarily because the police want to punish the voters for electing people they don’t like.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
22,768
9,767
136

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,432
4,949
136
NAFTA was a Republican plan. The only thing Clinton did was add a few restrictions to it.
Amazing the shit people attribute to Democrats that were in reality Republican/cons actions.

I guess you need to remind the cons here NAFTA’s creation was an election campaign promise by Ronald Reagan in 1980. By the time Clinton took office, it was fait accompli.