Guy loads Vista on his machine in 2 minutes

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

pcslookout

Lifer
Mar 18, 2007
11,959
157
106
Originally posted by: RedSquirrel
Those who don't have issues with Vista arn't computer techs and don't have to touch any vista machine but their own, and they're also not power users so they are just basic users that opened up their new PC and used it out of the box, and the most complex thing they did may of been to install a game. Sure, it will run fine for those users.

If you're a tech assisting or even remoting in to 100's of PCs per day fixing all sorts of issues, you quickly realize how POS vista is. One of my pet peves with Vista when it comes to remote support is the lack of telnet client. WTF? I know I can install it, but I'm not going to start asking users to put in their CD (99% of the time they wont have it) so I can install something that should already be installed in first place. It's like win98's winipcfg tool. Why did they remove it? It was a useful tool for remote troubleshooting. Easier then trying to get the user to go to run, type cmd and then type ipconfig. Tons of other issues like this which are only relevant when supporting the OS.

IMO the best OS to support would be Linux. Would be awesome to be able to just SSH in and fix problems without even affecting the user.

I disagree. Plenty of users here, who are power users, use Vista heavily and hardly ever have problems. Mem is one of them. Hope you don't mind Mem.
 

Kelemvor

Lifer
May 23, 2002
16,928
8
81
Was that video supposed to be funny?

I don't get why people don't like Vista unless it's on an underpowered machine that shouldn't be running it in the first place I always told people it sucked but that was because I had only seen it on slow machines. I have it on my laptop and have no complaints at all. I'm told 7 is basically Vista but without whatever makes Vista such a resource hog so I'll probably put that on my wife's laptop since her's is damn slow with Vista.
 

thehstrybean

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 2004
5,727
1
0
I don't mind Vista, but I WILL use XP if given the choice. I LOVE 7, but I keep getting C++/VB errors and can't install shit, and nothing works to fix it but a format. It sucks, and I think I've narrowed it down to the Lenovo Power Manager loading C++ 2005, but I put VS 2008 and it still gives me the same shit...
 

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,092
136
Originally posted by: CZroe
Absolutely NOT. I targeted stability and important usability issues. Not "pet peeves." As for those, the things Vista changed either worsened them or improved/added something every bit as unimportant as you pretend UI and stability are.

File copy dialogs still pop up, steal focus, and cancel when you are typing (due to hitting the space button). The primary click still sometimes gets stuck like an alt-click until you alt-click. Just like the Start Menu organizing before Vista overhauled it, these quirks have existed since Win95 and still haven't been fixed. Other than the Start Menu overhaul inadvertently fixing the interactivity problems that existed since the IE4 Desktop update for Win 95, Vista has NEW quirks without fixing, well, anything. OK, one more inadvertent "fix." My my brother and I discovered a data loss bug in Paint that has existed since Win 95 and they finally updated it (reproducible bug where "Save" would enable but your specific edits would not save), so that glitch is probably gone.

So here you're Vista failure is that dialog boxes pop up while you're not watching (I guess you're staring at the keyboard as your type or reading the copy while you're transcribing) and you accidentally hit spacebar to cancel? I can't say I frequently have this problem, in fact, I can't even remember the last time this happened. And while I'm sure it may have happened one or two times in the past year, I can say that if a new dialog box DIDN'T take focus I'd have many more instances of frustration. Far more frequently do I wait for a box to popup so I can read the information and hit space to cast it away. Popup windows are SUPPOSED to take focus to alert the user of something that's happening. Can you imagine how many people would completely miss them if they didn't? OS failure? No

Originally posted by: CZroe
DX11 was an arbitrary exclusive at the expense of continuing to treat certain products independent of the OS (WMP, IE, and DX11)... as arbitrary as making a DX8 port, Halo 2, exclusive to it. Understandably, they have allowed XP to depreciate to push Vista, but the least they could have done was include the latest IE and WMP when SP3 went gold. Instead, you get SP2 level browser and Media Player exploits out of the box despite years of updates to those bundled, but independent products in the interim. DX is no longer independent and I've relegated myself to that, so I'm not going to bitch and moan about Win7/DX11, but there really was no excuse for the SP3 IE/WMP business.
I'm not sure exactly what you're whining about here. My XP laptop is running IE8 and WMP11 with just slightly lower build numbers than my Vista desktop, which would seem to me that they've stayed on a fairly level playing field. I admit, I'm no expert in IE/WMP because I haven't used either for years but I'm not seeing a huge discrepancy either.

Originally posted by: CZroe
0 problem, eh? So, you're saying that Vista has never crashed on you? You've never had to force it off? You've used it daily since early 2007? Bullshit.
I would say I've had maybe 10 total crashes since Nov '07 (when I built this system and installed Vista). Of those 10, I can tell you that 2 or so came from bad drivers (beta versions), and at LEAST 5 came from OC attempts that left my system very unstable. There may have been 1 or 2 that just came out of no where, but honestly, I can't even remember when my system last crashed (now that I'm using a good set of drivers and my OC is stable). Call bullshit if you want, or maybe you're just exaggerating how unstable you think Vista is.

Originally posted by: CZroe
As for pushing the Windows key, in case you didn't notice, I said that they have the EXACT same problem there. You don't work in a call center, do you? Yes, they are a minority of callers, but there are enough that you would encounter them more than once. You can even tell them that it is the key between "CTRL/Control and ALT/Alternate on the area to the left of the spacebar (after confirming that they are on a desktop PC) and they will insist that there is nothing there like you describe (Windows flag/logo).
Please tell me how user stupidity is a flaw of the OS. You're going to tell me it's MS' fault that certain humans are so obtuse that they can't locate a button on their keyboard? Come on man.

Originally posted by: CZroe
And the Document folder names are a long-time Windows pet peeve... not related to Vista. All I said was that they didn't fix it. I even implied that it was too late to fix it and that they should have done it long ago with the switch to XP. My point was that they made things worse when they made similar changes that will throw a user off and yet they didn't take the opportunity to fix other things that are easy to do. IOW, an instructional document can no longer refer to "Start" button, "MY" Computer or "My" Pictures and expect the user to follow along on both OSes.
[/quote]
So after saying earlier that this is NOT about pet peeves, you list a pet peeve that is not related to Vista. :confused:
 

pcslookout

Lifer
Mar 18, 2007
11,959
157
106
Originally posted by: Mike Gayner
Originally posted by: pcslookout
Originally posted by: Mike Gayner
Originally posted by: pcslookout
Originally posted by: Mike Gayner
Originally posted by: pcslookout
Originally posted by: lxskllr
Originally posted by: Scholzpdx
Jesus Christ.

Anyone touting Win7 over Vista is a tool. It's even less of a difference from Windows 2000 pro to XP pro. It uses essentially the same services. Everything was exactly as fast on Vista as Win7.

Yea, it amuses me, all the people who are acting like Win7's the second coming. It's Vista with a tweaked gui, and a couple of parlor tricks to /appear/ faster. It's ok. If I bought a computer with Win7, I wouldn't wipe it in favor of Vista, but given the choice, I prefer a couple of things Vista has(mostly gui items), so that's what I'm keeping.

It is quite a laugh! Yeah Windows Vista has movie maker, windows mail (I know you can install these on windows 7 but still) and dual monitors at the moment work a lot better on Vista than 7.

No one I know of can get dual monitors working on Windows 7 as well as it does on Windows Vista. It works just not nearly as good.

?? What's the problem? I'm running dual monitors now and it's just fine as far as I can tell. Just as easy as Vista.

Are you a gamer if so what games do you play? Yes this involves the dual monitor problem.

Yes I'm a gamer. Lately it's COD4, Fallout 3, The Witcher, Bioshock, Company of Heroes, Far Cry 2 and a few others, including a few I play in a window like Trials 2 and SF4. I never have any problems running dual monitors.

Do you play CSS ?

No but I play other source titles.

Other source titles seem to work fine except TF2 and CSS. Not sure why either. There a lot of topics about it in the steam forums.

At least with CSS and Windows 7 there is.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Originally posted by: Scholzpdx
Jesus Christ.

Anyone touting Win7 over Vista is a tool. It's even less of a difference from Windows 2000 pro to XP pro. It uses essentially the same services. Everything was exactly as fast on Vista as Win7.

I think I should call the whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaambulance for you tools.

:confused:

http://www.techradar.com/revie...2923/review/?artc_pg=4

http://www.techradar.com/revie...2923/review/?artc_pg=6

"Final verdict

Windows 7 combines the security and architectural improvements of Windows Vista with better performance than XP can deliver on today's hardware. No version of Windows is ever perfect, but Windows 7 really is the best release of Windows yet."

http://www.engadget.com/2009/0...rough-benchmark-tests/

^^ That was with pre-RC Win7.

"Windows 7 is a much more ambitious undertaking that not only addresses the performance issues in Vista but does a lot to deal with the historical complexity of the Windows platform (and speed up many-core systems when they become common)."

From what I can tell regarding research related to differences of Vista vs. Win7, the performance has most definitely been improved. A lot of this has only come out with the RC release of Win7. The betas were promising, but the final is a lot faster.

Also, there are a number of substantial blood and guts changes under the hood, look up MinWin/7 :)
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Originally posted by: CRXican
so where do I get Windows 7?

October 22nd to retail. The RTM download is already available. AFAIK, you can install the version that you wish to purchase but skip the input of the key, and you can use it for up to 30 days before having to put the key in. When it hits retail : buy your version, then put the key in / activate :)

 

secretanchitman

Diamond Member
Apr 11, 2001
9,352
23
91
7 is a lot better than vista thats for sure, but until software absolutely doesnt work on xp, im sticking with xp.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Originally posted by: secretanchitman
7 is a lot better than vista thats for sure, but until software absolutely doesnt work on xp, im sticking with xp.

:thumbsup:

Yeah, upgrade when you need to, no reason to spend $ when what you got is working for you.

Best candidates for Win7 = high-end gamers, new PC builds, netbooks.

Worst candidates for Win7 = casual / web user, old PCs (512MB or less ram).
 

Mike Gayner

Diamond Member
Jan 5, 2007
6,175
3
0
Originally posted by: pcslookout
Originally posted by: Mike Gayner
Originally posted by: pcslookout
Originally posted by: Mike Gayner
Originally posted by: pcslookout
Originally posted by: Mike Gayner
Originally posted by: pcslookout
Originally posted by: lxskllr
Originally posted by: Scholzpdx
Jesus Christ.

Anyone touting Win7 over Vista is a tool. It's even less of a difference from Windows 2000 pro to XP pro. It uses essentially the same services. Everything was exactly as fast on Vista as Win7.

Yea, it amuses me, all the people who are acting like Win7's the second coming. It's Vista with a tweaked gui, and a couple of parlor tricks to /appear/ faster. It's ok. If I bought a computer with Win7, I wouldn't wipe it in favor of Vista, but given the choice, I prefer a couple of things Vista has(mostly gui items), so that's what I'm keeping.

It is quite a laugh! Yeah Windows Vista has movie maker, windows mail (I know you can install these on windows 7 but still) and dual monitors at the moment work a lot better on Vista than 7.

No one I know of can get dual monitors working on Windows 7 as well as it does on Windows Vista. It works just not nearly as good.

?? What's the problem? I'm running dual monitors now and it's just fine as far as I can tell. Just as easy as Vista.

Are you a gamer if so what games do you play? Yes this involves the dual monitor problem.

Yes I'm a gamer. Lately it's COD4, Fallout 3, The Witcher, Bioshock, Company of Heroes, Far Cry 2 and a few others, including a few I play in a window like Trials 2 and SF4. I never have any problems running dual monitors.

Do you play CSS ?

No but I play other source titles.

Other source titles seem to work fine except TF2 and CSS. Not sure why either. There a lot of topics about it in the steam forums.

At least with CSS and Windows 7 there is.

I play TF2 on Win7 with my dual monitors, no problem here.
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
Originally posted by: schneiderguy
I still don't understand all of the hate Vista gets. Windows7 is the exact same thing with a new taskbar and all of a sudden its teh best OS evar!1!!! Sure, it's better, but its not that much better :confused:

The caching of the frequently used programs in free memory is annoying as hell. The hard drive spins forever because of this.

In my previous rant, I complained about the 5 minute boot up. Well, no improvement over XP there.

"Are you sure you meant to do that" dialogs

Norton Ghost doesn't work with Vista. All it takes is an update of Ghost and Blamo. I blame Norton as much as Microsoft, but it worked fine in XP!

2 minute solutions to all issues:

1. Disable Superfetch

2. Disable UAC

3. Dont use Norton products, ever.
 

iGas

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2009
6,240
1
0
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: secretanchitman
7 is a lot better than vista thats for sure, but until software absolutely doesnt work on xp, im sticking with xp.

:thumbsup:

Yeah, upgrade when you need to, no reason to spend $ when what you got is working for you.

Best candidates for Win7 = high-end gamers, new PC builds, netbooks.

Worst candidates for Win7 = casual / web user, old PCs (512MB or less ram).
My computer is 2 month old and I do not care if it is Vista or Win7.

Win2K was the last M$ OS iteration that I use, but it doesn't have drivers for my new computer therefor I was forced to purchase a newer Windows (doesn't mean better) to play Civ4. Linux is my OS of choice since the late 90s.
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
I had a large number of nvidia driver issues early on with Vista (got it the day of launch, issues were mainly with Dreamscene). After they ironed those out i haven't had a crash in over a year, and the few i have had were related to overclocking.
 

rockyct

Diamond Member
Jun 23, 2001
6,656
32
91
Originally posted by: pcslookout
Originally posted by: Mike Gayner
Originally posted by: pcslookout
Originally posted by: Mike Gayner
Originally posted by: pcslookout
Originally posted by: Mike Gayner
Originally posted by: pcslookout
Originally posted by: lxskllr
Originally posted by: Scholzpdx
Jesus Christ.

Anyone touting Win7 over Vista is a tool. It's even less of a difference from Windows 2000 pro to XP pro. It uses essentially the same services. Everything was exactly as fast on Vista as Win7.

Yea, it amuses me, all the people who are acting like Win7's the second coming. It's Vista with a tweaked gui, and a couple of parlor tricks to /appear/ faster. It's ok. If I bought a computer with Win7, I wouldn't wipe it in favor of Vista, but given the choice, I prefer a couple of things Vista has(mostly gui items), so that's what I'm keeping.

It is quite a laugh! Yeah Windows Vista has movie maker, windows mail (I know you can install these on windows 7 but still) and dual monitors at the moment work a lot better on Vista than 7.

No one I know of can get dual monitors working on Windows 7 as well as it does on Windows Vista. It works just not nearly as good.

?? What's the problem? I'm running dual monitors now and it's just fine as far as I can tell. Just as easy as Vista.

Are you a gamer if so what games do you play? Yes this involves the dual monitor problem.

Yes I'm a gamer. Lately it's COD4, Fallout 3, The Witcher, Bioshock, Company of Heroes, Far Cry 2 and a few others, including a few I play in a window like Trials 2 and SF4. I never have any problems running dual monitors.

Do you play CSS ?

No but I play other source titles.

Other source titles seem to work fine except TF2 and CSS. Not sure why either. There a lot of topics about it in the steam forums.

At least with CSS and Windows 7 there is.

Hmm, I'm using Win7 RC with TF2 and it works great.
 

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,235
136
Originally posted by: TheVrolok
Originally posted by: CZroe
Absolutely NOT. I targeted stability and important usability issues. Not "pet peeves." As for those, the things Vista changed either worsened them or improved/added something every bit as unimportant as you pretend UI and stability are.

File copy dialogs still pop up, steal focus, and cancel when you are typing (due to hitting the space button). The primary click still sometimes gets stuck like an alt-click until you alt-click. Just like the Start Menu organizing before Vista overhauled it, these quirks have existed since Win95 and still haven't been fixed. Other than the Start Menu overhaul inadvertently fixing the interactivity problems that existed since the IE4 Desktop update for Win 95, Vista has NEW quirks without fixing, well, anything. OK, one more inadvertent "fix." My my brother and I discovered a data loss bug in Paint that has existed since Win 95 and they finally updated it (reproducible bug where "Save" would enable but your specific edits would not save), so that glitch is probably gone.

So here you're Vista failure is that dialog boxes pop up while you're not watching (I guess you're staring at the keyboard as your type or reading the copy while you're transcribing) and you accidentally hit spacebar to cancel? I can't say I frequently have this problem, in fact, I can't even remember the last time this happened. And while I'm sure it may have happened one or two times in the past year, I can say that if a new dialog box DIDN'T take focus I'd have many more instances of frustration. Far more frequently do I wait for a box to popup so I can read the information and hit space to cast it away. Popup windows are SUPPOSED to take focus to alert the user of something that's happening. Can you imagine how many people would completely miss them if they didn't? OS failure? No

Originally posted by: CZroe
DX11 was an arbitrary exclusive at the expense of continuing to treat certain products independent of the OS (WMP, IE, and DX11)... as arbitrary as making a DX8 port, Halo 2, exclusive to it. Understandably, they have allowed XP to depreciate to push Vista, but the least they could have done was include the latest IE and WMP when SP3 went gold. Instead, you get SP2 level browser and Media Player exploits out of the box despite years of updates to those bundled, but independent products in the interim. DX is no longer independent and I've relegated myself to that, so I'm not going to bitch and moan about Win7/DX11, but there really was no excuse for the SP3 IE/WMP business.
I'm not sure exactly what you're whining about here. My XP laptop is running IE8 and WMP11 with just slightly lower build numbers than my Vista desktop, which would seem to me that they've stayed on a fairly level playing field. I admit, I'm no expert in IE/WMP because I haven't used either for years but I'm not seeing a huge discrepancy either.

Originally posted by: CZroe
0 problem, eh? So, you're saying that Vista has never crashed on you? You've never had to force it off? You've used it daily since early 2007? Bullshit.
I would say I've had maybe 10 total crashes since Nov '07 (when I built this system and installed Vista). Of those 10, I can tell you that 2 or so came from bad drivers (beta versions), and at LEAST 5 came from OC attempts that left my system very unstable. There may have been 1 or 2 that just came out of no where, but honestly, I can't even remember when my system last crashed (now that I'm using a good set of drivers and my OC is stable). Call bullshit if you want, or maybe you're just exaggerating how unstable you think Vista is.

Originally posted by: CZroe
As for pushing the Windows key, in case you didn't notice, I said that they have the EXACT same problem there. You don't work in a call center, do you? Yes, they are a minority of callers, but there are enough that you would encounter them more than once. You can even tell them that it is the key between "CTRL/Control and ALT/Alternate on the area to the left of the spacebar (after confirming that they are on a desktop PC) and they will insist that there is nothing there like you describe (Windows flag/logo).
Please tell me how user stupidity is a flaw of the OS. You're going to tell me it's MS' fault that certain humans are so obtuse that they can't locate a button on their keyboard? Come on man.

Originally posted by: CZroe
And the Document folder names are a long-time Windows pet peeve... not related to Vista. All I said was that they didn't fix it. I even implied that it was too late to fix it and that they should have done it long ago with the switch to XP. My point was that they made things worse when they made similar changes that will throw a user off and yet they didn't take the opportunity to fix other things that are easy to do. IOW, an instructional document can no longer refer to "Start" button, "MY" Computer or "My" Pictures and expect the user to follow along on both OSes.
So after saying earlier that this is NOT about pet peeves, you list a pet peeve that is not related to Vista. :confused:
[/quote]

I am a VERY fast and productive touch typist. It happens to me ALL THE TIME that I'm typing when something finishes or a dialog pops up. I end up canceling something or selecting 10 options because a pop-up dialog stole keyboard focus and captured 10 keystrokes in a split second.

It's the operating system's fault and the APIs should make sure that a pop-up function can set the z-priority to make a dialog visible without actually stealing keyboard focus. Is it that hard, Microsoft?

That's a flaw that Microsoft has allowed in every version of Windows.

Still, I can't begin to tell you have many times I've encountered usability flaws with Vista that are not a problem with XP. Manual editing of file associations and actions, anyone?

I'm not biased. I was a huge Windows ME apologist and I was one of the first to switch to XP when everyone else was complaining about obvious improvements as 'flaws'. I've used Vista almost exclusively since it came out (Microsoft arbitrarily wouldn't release DirectX 10 for XP). I've been using Windows 7 since the first public Beta. There are some big improvements, but it still carries over many of the same flaws introduced with Vista.

As a tech support specialist, I have to find out how to control all the little things and know what other people see when they use it. I try to be as familiar as possible with the tiny differences between different versions of Windows and its components.

I will criticize anything I use. I have no shortage of criticisms for Windows XP. Neither Vista nor Windows 7 fix most of the basic annoyances I have with XP, and they add many of their own problems. Believe me when I say that Windows would be MUCH more usable AND secure if I had any control over development.
 

zerocool84

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
36,041
472
126
Never had any problems with Vista. There's some serious PEBKAC here in this thread. My system runs much more stable and programs run much faster than XP ever did. W7 is just a refined Vista and see no reason to upgrade until SP1 comes out for it.
 

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,092
136
Originally posted by: Ichinisan
I am a VERY fast and productive touch typist. It happens to me ALL THE TIME that I'm typing when something finishes or a dialog pops up. I end up canceling something or selecting 10 options because a pop-up dialog stole keyboard focus and captured 10 keystrokes in a split second.

It's the operating system's fault and the APIs should make sure that a pop-up function can set the z-priority to make a dialog visible without actually stealing keyboard focus. Is it that hard, Microsoft?

That's a flaw that Microsoft has allowed in every version of Windows.

Still, I can't begin to tell you have many times I've encountered usability flaws with Vista that are not a problem with XP. Manual editing of file associations and actions, anyone?

I'm not biased. I was a huge Windows ME apologist and I was one of the first to switch to XP when everyone else was complaining about obvious improvements as 'flaws'. I've used Vista almost exclusively since it came out (Microsoft arbitrarily wouldn't release DirectX 10 for XP). I've been using Windows 7 since the first public Beta. There are some big improvements, but it still carries over many of the same flaws introduced with Vista.

As a tech support specialist, I have to find out how to control all the little things and know what other people see when they use it. I try to be as familiar as possible with the tiny differences between different versions of Windows and its components.

I will criticize anything I use. I have no shortage of criticisms for Windows XP. Neither Vista nor Windows 7 fix most of the basic annoyances I have with XP, and they add many of their own problems. Believe me when I say that Windows would be MUCH more usable AND secure if I had any control over development.

I type over 100 WPM as well, and again, this isn't a huge problem for me. Please tell me what tasks you routinely perform that involve dialog boxes popping up frequently while you're also typing large volumes of text. I just don't see this being a frequent problem for many people I know.
 

dwell

pics?
Oct 9, 1999
5,185
2
0
Originally posted by: zerocool84
Never had any problems with Vista. There's some serious PEBKAC here in this thread. My system runs much more stable and programs run much faster than XP ever did. W7 is just a refined Vista and see no reason to upgrade until SP1 comes out for it.

But W7 is Vista SP2 anways, so...
 

Nik

Lifer
Jun 5, 2006
16,101
3
56
Originally posted by: schneiderguy
I still don't understand all of the hate Vista gets. Windows7 is the exact same thing with a new taskbar and all of a sudden its teh best OS evar!1!!! Sure, it's better, but its not that much better :confused:

It's very different. Faster, more reliable, MUCH less of a resource hog.

Vista was pushed out early to make M$ investors happy but it wasn't a finished OS. Windows 7 is what Vista was supposed to be if the Vista release could have been held back to wait for a finished product.

It's not as bad as, but a similar situation to Windows ME.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Originally posted by: Chris
Originally posted by: zerocool84
Never had any problems with Vista. There's some serious PEBKAC here in this thread. My system runs much more stable and programs run much faster than XP ever did. W7 is just a refined Vista and see no reason to upgrade until SP1 comes out for it.

But W7 is Vista SP2 anways, so...

No, it's not, go do some research. Vista SP2 on a 1GB netbook is slow as molasses. Win7 RTM on the same 1GB netbook is faster than XP (!!!).

It's similarly quicker on pretty much any hardware.
 

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,920
2,161
126
Originally posted by: guyver01
Originally posted by: WA261
To bad Vista sux ass.

vista is actually pretty damn decent.

I'm running Vista Ultimate and it runs fine on my PC
Specs:
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+ 2.4GHz
4 GB RAM
250 GB HDD (110 GB free)
nVidia GeForce 9400 GT 1024Mb PCIe 2.0

Yeah, after the 2nd service pack, they fixed all the problems. It still has sleep/hibernate issues on laptops though.