Guy builds 140sqft battle of Hoth diorama in his living room!

disappoint

Lifer
Dec 7, 2009
10,132
382
126
He's got a great sense of humor. Too bad 90% of it is self deprecating because he has nothing better to do with his time than make a cheesy diorama of one of the cheesiest movies of all time. His time would have been better spent perfecting the best cheese pizza of all time. It would still be cheezy, but then you could eat it too!

Just kidding. I mean..er....Neat!
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,374
8,499
126
the wired article on the battle of hoth was good, but the top rated comment is the greatest thing i've ever read on teh intartrons.
 

Angry Irishman

Golden Member
Jan 25, 2010
1,883
1
81
nerds.jpg
 

DigDog

Lifer
Jun 3, 2011
14,033
2,527
126
[nerd]
the ATAT never made it that close while troops were still operating the defences.
The troops that challenge Solo & co were foot soldiers (as seen in the film).
Also, Lord Vader was nowhere near Hoth. So, meh.
[/nerd]
 

DaTT

Garage Moderator
Moderator
Feb 13, 2003
13,295
118
106
Awesome. But, the guy tries way to hard to be funny.
 

SamQuint

Golden Member
Dec 6, 2010
1,155
45
91
to this day I think the AT-ATs are the dumbest idea in any science fiction movie, other than Jar Jar.

Let's make huge walkers that are damn slow and are easy to spot and can be heard from miles around. Oh don't forget to put in an big weak spot so they can be destroyed easily.

With all the hovering vehicles in Star Wars, anything with legs or wheels is just kind of stupid.
 

Newbian

Lifer
Aug 24, 2008
24,774
872
126
to this day I think the AT-ATs are the dumbest idea in any science fiction movie, other than Jar Jar.

Let's make huge walkers that are damn slow and are easy to spot and can be heard from miles around. Oh don't forget to put in an big weak spot so they can be destroyed easily.

With all the hovering vehicles in Star Wars, anything with legs or wheels is just kind of stupid.

Remember what AT-AT stands for.

The hover vehicles had many limits on height and weather conditions not to mention generally were more expensive I believe.
 

Nintendesert

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2010
7,761
5
0
[nerd]
the ATAT never made it that close while troops were still operating the defences.
The troops that challenge Solo & co were foot soldiers (as seen in the film).
Also, Lord Vader was nowhere near Hoth. So, meh.
[/nerd]



Turn in your nerd card. :colbert:
 

SamQuint

Golden Member
Dec 6, 2010
1,155
45
91
Remember what AT-AT stands for.

The hover vehicles had many limits on height and weather conditions not to mention generally were more expensive I believe.


All Terrain armored transport, all terrain really??? How is that thing going to climb mountains or cross lakes or large rivers.

Plus they show all types of hovering vehicles and vehicles flying through the atmosphere in the Star Wars universe.

More expensive?? If they can afford a fleet of star destroyers and and a couple of death stars and can afford to blow up planets, they can afford a hovering cruiser that can carry troops into battle.
 

Newbian

Lifer
Aug 24, 2008
24,774
872
126
All Terrain armored transport, all terrain really??? How is that thing going to climb mountains or cross lakes or large rivers.

Plus they show all types of hovering vehicles and vehicles flying through the atmosphere in the Star Wars universe.

More expensive?? If they can afford a fleet of star destroyers and and a couple of death stars and can afford to blow up planets, they can afford a hovering cruiser that can carry troops into battle.

All terrain generally doesn't include bodies of water.

As for all the vehicles flying they are more likely ships as generally the vehicles referred to as hover vehicles only go a few feet off the ground for the larger ones so they can be a hazard when going over uneven terrain.
 
Last edited:

Nintendesert

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2010
7,761
5
0
I just figured it was for the cool factor for the movie and intimidation factor for the Empire as it roflstomped people.
 

McLovin

Golden Member
Jul 8, 2007
1,911
58
91
the wired article on the battle of hoth was good, but the top rated comment is the greatest thing i've ever read on teh intartrons.

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/02/battle-of-hoth/

TOP COMMENT said:
JordanViray•3 days ago

Have you even served with the Imperial forces? Sure it's easy to take potshots from your military blog in some no-name star system while the fleet and its legions fight the rebel insurgents, but combined space/air/ground operations are a lot messier than any infographic could ever portray.

Even with the Empire's full spectrum dominance of the battlespace, you can't just leverage fleet assets which are optimized for ship-to-ship combat into a large scale ground invasion force. A Star Destroyer might have more firepower than the entire militaries of less advanced worlds but you still need a proper ground assault ship to support infantry landings.

Unfortunately, the do-nothing blowhards in Coruscant couldn't get funding for the promising alternative designs from Sienar Fleet Systems and we ended up (as usual) with Kuat Drive Yards' overpriced, overdue, and underperforming AT-AT mess.

That is purely awesome!