[Guru3d] Crysis DX11 Benchmarks (AMD vs Nvidia)

[Lonbjerg]

This looks next gen to me. :thumbsup:

That is because it requires next gen performance..aka 3xGTX580 performance...

 

[badb0y]

I only played pre-patch so I don't know about this new stuff but Crysis 1 looked much better than Crysis 2 when I first played Crysis 2(Pre-patch). I will have to go look into it again with the patch to see if they made it any better.

 

[AtenRa]

That is because it requires next gen performance..aka 3xGTX580 performance...

Well in 6 months from now it will require only 2x GTX670 :biggrin:

Seriously, devs need to puss the envelop in graphics put i guess we need to wait one or two more years in order to get the Samaritan graphics in games.

I used to buy high end graphics cards in order to be able to play games with higher IQ settings, now even a single middle end card like HD6950 or GTX560ti is more than enough for 1080p Gaming (for the majority of the games).

It is clear that Crytek lowered their standards with Crysis 2 for the console sake and the DX-11 patch over a high polygon graphics just strain more the graphics cards with minimum IQ enhancements.

They clearly took the console way, unlike Dice and BF3 witch seams they develop the FrostBite 2 engine to take advantage of all DX-10/11 features and create the Game for PC use first and then porting it to Consoles (i know we need to see the end result first).

 

[Lonbjerg]

Well in 6 months from now it will require only 2x GTX670 :biggrin:

Seriously, devs need to puss the envelop in graphics put i guess we need to wait one or two more years in order to get the Samaritan graphics in games.

I used to buy high end graphics cards in order to be able to play games with higher IQ settings, now even a single middle end card like HD6950 or GTX560ti is more than enough for 1080p Gaming (for the majority of the games).

It is clear that Crytek lowered their standards with Crysis 2 for the console sake and the DX-11 patch over a high polygon graphics just strain more the graphics cards with minimum IQ enhancements.

They clearly took the console way, unlike Dice and BF3 witch seams they develop the FrostBite 2 engine to take advantage of all DX-10/11 features and create the Game for PC use first and then porting it to Consoles (i know we need to see the end result first).

John Carmack is taking "id" the same router.
Make games for PC and they cut features to make them run on consoles.

Sad thing is that we could have told him that in 2006...shame people were so blinded by PR console FUD to not see the limitations...

 

[PingviN]

Sad thing is that we could have told him that in 2006...shame people were so blinded by PR console FUD to not see the limitations...

Sad thing he couldn't figure it out for himself. Doesn't take a genius to realize that PCs would overtake consoles soon enough. A damn shame.

 

[Raider1284]

Have people checked out this fellows mod ? Looks like some nice screenshots.
http://maldotex.blogspot.com/

the textures look great! but currently they dont support tessellation at all. He just got a new dx11 card though from donations so hopefully dx11 textures will be out soon that enable tessellation again. The next textures do look great but I not willing to give up tessellation to get them.

 

[apoppin]

In every way? The debate may continue about graphics, but the physics engine in Crysis 1 blows Crysis 2 away. The environments and objects in Crysis 2 aren't destructible in the way that they are in Crysis 1. Do trees react to bullet fire the same way as in Crysis 1? Do plants realistically react as the character passes them? Watch this video. <--- These things aren't affected by DX11/High-rez texture pack in Crysis 2.

Either way, when Crysis 1 came out, it stood alone. You can't say that Crysis 2 is by far the best looking game on the PC now. . . .

...

Crysis 2 just meets expectations for what a good looking game should look like in 2010-2011, but in no way shape or form does it smell like a next generation game.

This looks next gen to me. :thumbsup:

Water is far more interactive in Crysis 2 and looks far far better than it does in the original. And destructible environments have been around for years and years; the devs chose not to implement it in 2.

i do think Crysis 2 looks better than any other modern PC game; perhaps it did not meet your own expectations but it looks better than Metro 2033 (for example) and it runs better maxed out; it is also a more polished game.

Yes, Samaritin does look next gen - and it will take next gen HW to properly run it.
. . . Tech demos always look great.

 

[Lonbjerg]

. . Tech demos always look great.

I tkae it you skipped over AMD's tessellation/OpenCL physcis demo then...because boy that did look like *not allowed to speak freely because those that get offended have takne my free speech away*

 

[apoppin]

I tkae it you skipped over AMD's tessellation/OpenCL physcis demo then...because boy that did look like *not allowed to speak freely because those that get offended have takne my free speech away*

You can always water it down; crap conveys a certain image and you can always add adjectives. Four-letter expletives are for the lazy.

And i do not expect my forum posts to be held to the same scrutiny as when i am writing an article. i meant - tech demos generally look better than the game when it finally comes out; so do trailers and teasers. Posters will give them as evidence of next gen and are then bitterly disappointed when it actually arrives.
:\

 

[Souv]

don't see a shit review of g3d.....they are nvidia biased as many other shill paid sites and this how i got banned of that shill site.....
.........amd cards and cpus are clearly ahead in crysis 3 game

.........http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Crysi...e/2046899/#?a_id=1056491&g_id=-1&i_id=2046902


........http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Crysis-3-PC-235317/Tests/Crysis-3-Test-CPU-Benchmark-1056578/


i told them these reviews are fake and biased just to make nv cards look great as they done with 7950ghz edition,similar to what they done fc3 bench calling 7970 boost

there is no 7950ghz edition card unless you manually oc it or bios flash....only recent released aftermarket design msi card gives 7950 a highest boost clock of 960 mhz but forum member told me they have done bench with official sku design...what utter bullshit

and hour after this msg pops up-

"You have been banned for the following reason:
No reason was specified.
Date the ban will be lifted: Never"




mark the words "No reason was specified"....haha coz you are a shill nvi site as many other...nvidia butt kising reviews for almighty dollars:ninja:

 

[3DVagabond]

Necro thread.