cytg111
Lifer
- Mar 17, 2008
- 23,993
- 13,519
- 136
A whole lot of things will have run out by the time I run out of ammoOn a long enough timeline, ammo runs out.
It doesnt matter.A whole lot of things will have run out by the time I run out of ammo![]()
That's the plan. Most of my ammo is for practice, and while not as effective as defense ammo, it will serve the purpose nicely.It doesnt matter.
You dont need to kill lots of people or even burn up ammo. You just need to make it clear you will be a difficult target and looters will move on to easier pickings.
If someone is not completely desperate I suspect a bullet zipping by them will discourage an attack on your home.That's the plan. Most of my ammo is for practice, and while not as effective as defense ammo, it will serve the purpose nicely.
I know people living check to check that spend their money on more guns and more ammo. I guess they don't realize that having an emergency fund will probably be a lot more useful in 99.96% of the situations they may encounter in life than someone coming to steal their toilet paper and Spam supply.
This should not turn into a gun thread, but I am really thinking of the new Colt Python, but jeez, $1,500?!
That's the plan. Most of my ammo is for practice, and while not as effective as defense ammo, it will serve the purpose nicely.
LOL, "and my TP", who would have thought TP could gain you social status!. I have a 30 roll stash, I feel important now since I'll bring in a roll or two for desperate co-workers.If someone is not completely desperate I suspect a bullet zipping by them will discourage an attack on your home.
Now when they get truly desperate and assault the fortress intent on getting my food and TP?
Well, fuck it, I've had a good life.
That is extremely dangerous and irresponsible advice to give anyone. A firearm is not a less than lethal weapon. If you aren't willing to destroy it, don't ever point a gun at it. That B.S. about using rock salt rounds is just that, a load of B.S.Shotguns are good because of the various loads you can chuck in the shells. For home defense, I like the first one in the chute to be rock salt followed by 00's to finish things up. That way, just in case the "intruder" wasn't the baddie you thought they were, they'll have a much better chance of surviving the first blast and if they were a baddie they'd be stopped far enough and long enough away's to give you enough time to rack the show stopper and decide whether to send it......or hopefully not.
No, you butt. Its doesnt get you social status it gets a target painted on your back.LOL, "and my TP", who would have thought TP could gain you social status!. I have a 30 roll stash, I feel important now since I'll bring in a roll or two for desperate co-workers.
Sounds like a Twilight Zone episode called 'the shelter",No, you butt. Its doesnt get you social status it gets a target painted on your back.
Having a bomb shelter with supplies sounds real nice, until your neighbors come calling and they don't necessarily ask nicely.
It's just that you have a habit of demanding links to any information you don't agree with in an attempt to invalidate other's arguments, when you could do a quick google search yourself to determine of someone's post is B.S. or not. Or at least it comes off that way sometimes.Problem?
You don't think ARs and AKs are selling like hot cakes too ATM? It's not just 5-shot .38 revolvers being panic bought.So what, no one wants the 2nd amendment revoked, people DO WANT bans on AK style weapons with 100rnd clips. Not needed for any legit purpose. Of course your type will cry like a fucking 12yr old, "Wa-ahahahahahahah! they want ALL our guns!"
That's why we have to stand up against both.Lot's of liberal and democrats end goal is to severely curtail or eliminate private ownership of guns, just like there are many conservative republicans that want to eliminate abortion, they both realize that a complete ban isn't happening all at once so they are going to do it piecemeal going after the most egregious and hardest to defend positions while also applying ever stricter laws in the name of saving the children, pre or post womb.
It's just that you have a habit of demanding links to any information you don't agree with in an attempt to invalidate other's arguments, when you could do a quick google search yourself to determine of someone's post is B.S. or not. Or at least it comes off that way sometimes.
Agreed. If someone is willing to violate the ban on murder, I don't know what gun ban you could ever pass that they would respect. Since those demanding "reasonable" gun control can't actually figure out a way to disarm those who commit crime and murder, all they do propose laws that would only disarm the lawful who aren't the problem.All the mass shootings recently have been in states which banned 100 round magazines. They either dont need them to kill lots of people or they get them despite the law.
Perfect example is the goons who executed the North Hollywood shootout.
Hah! You posted a link this time before they could demand one, lol.I trust some Doctors. Have you ever read the John Hopkins study on 250,000 medical error deaths caused by doctors, nurses and other health care workers? You should, it's the 3rd leading cause of U.S. deaths.
![]()
Medical Errors Are No. 3 Cause Of U.S Deaths, Researchers Say
If not for flawed classification of deaths, medical mistakes would be the third leading cause of U.S. deaths, Johns Hopkins researchers say. They're calling on the CDC to track deaths from errors.www.npr.org
Mostly. But if someone doesn't come back and satisfy the request for a link then it's often assume their post wasn't factual, regardless of whether it actually was or not. No offense.The point of my asking for backing links is to see what source a person is using to base their opinion on. I don't need to google search as it would be pointless. If someone makes a claim, then they should be able to source it.
Agreed?
Mostly. But if someone doesn't come back and satisfy the request for a link then it's often assume their post wasn't factual, regardless of whether it actually was or not. No offense.
I understand being reasonably prepared because, no mater how unlikely it, could happen. But way too many people going to sleep and dreaming about their chance to go all Mad Max and shoot someone over the last can of dog food. Or roll of two-ply.It doesnt matter.
You dont need to kill lots of people or even burn up ammo. You just need to make it clear you will be a difficult target and looters will move on to easier pickings.
Well, jeez, and here I was doing my best to impress you.You mean nothing to me. lol. Go lie with the dogs.
Agreed. If someone is willing to violate the ban on murder, I don't know what gun ban you could ever pass that they would respect. Since those demanding "reasonable" gun control can't actually figure out a way to disarm those who commit crime and murder, all they do propose laws that would only disarm the lawful who aren't the problem.
Enough is enough. No more compromises. Lawful gun owners shouldn't surrender any more of their constitutional rights to satisfy gun-grabbers naive desire to feel like they are doing something when they are not.
"I've been around for a long, long year"Hah! You posted a link this time before they could demand one, lol.
That's kind of where I'm at. We would have to forcibly remove every last gun and physically prevent any new guns from being made or smuggled into the country to stop gun violence. It's wishful thinking to believe that's even possible.I'd actually be Ok with gun control if somebody could come up with a way of taking them away from criminals, but I just dont see that happening.
People have those dreams anyway, even if they dont have guns. I cant fix that. All I wanna do is be ready for the most likely scenarios.I understand being reasonably prepared because, no mater how unlikely it, could happen. But way too many people going to sleep and dreaming about their chance to go all Mad Max and shoot someone over the last can of dog food. Or roll of two-ply.
