Gulf petro-powers to launch currency in latest threat to dollar hegemony

Status
Not open for further replies.

PJABBER

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
4,822
0
0
As a follow-through to the abysmal fiscal policies of the Democrat Congress and the oblivious Obama Administration, there are a number of attempts around the world aimed at securing some protection from American malfeasance. A decoupling from America's dollar is a decoupling from the consequences of Obamanomics, if you will.

While countries such as China are still buying, and thus supporting, US dollar debt (who knows how long that will continue?) others are looking toward regional and world currency alternatives pegged on other than the U.S. dollar.

Various South American countries are exploring de-coupling from the dollar, Asian countries trade ever more in their regional currencies, the euro is gaining more favor and the U.S. continues to pursue fiscally ruinous policies.

There are whispers in Washington that the dollar should only exist as part of a basket of world currencies, rather than be a standard for solidity and solvency. Funny how those whispers keep getting louder.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/...ency-in-latest-threat-to-dollar-hegemony.html

Gulf petro-powers to launch currency in latest threat to dollar hegemony

The Arab states of the Gulf region have agreed to launch a single currency modelled on the euro, hoping to blaze a trail towards a pan-Arab monetary union swelling to the ancient borders of the Ummayad Caliphate.

By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
The Telegraph (UK)
Published: 7:12PM GMT 15 Dec 2009

“The Gulf monetary union pact has come into effect,” said Kuwait’s finance minister, Mustafa al-Shamali, speaking at a Gulf Co-operation Council (GCC) summit in Kuwait.

The move will give the hyper-rich club of oil exporters a petro-currency of their own, greatly increasing their influence in the global exchange and capital markets and potentially displacing the US dollar as the pricing currency for oil contracts. Between them they amount to regional superpower with a GDP of $1.2 trillion (£739bn), some 40pc of the world’s proven oil reserves, and financial clout equal to that of China.

Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Qatar are to launch the first phase next year, creating a Gulf Monetary Council that will evolve quickly into a full-fledged central bank.

The Emirates are staying out for now – irked that the bank will be located in Riyadh at the insistence of Saudi King Abdullah rather than in Abu Dhabi. They are expected join later, along with Oman.

The Gulf states remain divided over the wisdom of anchoring their economies to the US dollar. The Gulf currency – dubbed “Gulfo” – is likely to track a global exchange basket and may ultimately float as a regional reserve currency in its own right. “The US dollar has failed. We need to delink,” said Nahed Taher, chief executive of Bahrain’s Gulf One Investment Bank.

The project is inspired by Europe’s monetary union, seen as a huge success in the Arab world. But there are concerns that the region is trying to run before it can walk.

Europe took 40 years to reach the point where it felt ready to launch a currency. It began with the creation of the Iron & Steel Community in the 1950s, moving by steps towards a single market enforced by powerful Commission and European Court. The EMU timetable was fixed at the Masstricht in 1991 but it took another 11 for euro notes and coins to reach the streets.

Khalid Bin Ahmad Al Kalifa, Bahrain’s foreign minister, told the FIKR Arab Thought summit in Kuwait that the project would not work unless the Gulf countries first break down basic barriers to trade and capital flows.

At the moment, trucks sit paralysed at border posts for days awaiting entry clearance. Labour mobility between states is almost zero.

“The single currency should come last. We need to coordinate our economic policies and build up common infrastructure as a first step,” he said.

Mohammed El-Enein, chair of the energy and industry committee in Egypt’s parliament, said Europe’s example could help the Arab world achieve its half-century dream of a unified currency, but the task requires discipline. “We need exactly the same institutions as the EU has created. We need a commission, a court, and a bank,” he said.

The last currency to trade in souks from Marakesh, to Baghdad and Mecca, was the Ottomon Piaster, known as the “kurush”. It suffered chronic inflation as the silver coinage was debased.

There is a logic to an Arab currency. The region speaks one language, has the unifying creed of “Umma Wahida” or One Nation from the Koran, and has not torn itself apart in savage wars – ever – in quite the way that Europe has in living memory.

Yet hurdles are formidable even for the tight-knit group of Gulf states. While the eurozone is a club of rough equals – with Germany, France, Italy, and Spain each holding two votes on the ECB council – the Gulf currency will be dominated by Saudi Arabia. The risk is that other countries will feel like satellites. Monetary policy will inevitably be set for Riyadh’s needs.

Hans Redeker, currency chief at BNP Paraibas, said the Gulf states may have romanticised Europe’s achievement and need to move with great care to avoid making the same errors.

“The Greek crisis has exposed the weak foundations on which the euro is built. The gap in competitiveness between core Europe and the periphery has grown wider and wider. The obvious mistake was to launch EMU without a central fiscal authority and political union, as the Bundesbank warned in the 1990s,” he said.

“The euro was created for political reasons after the fall of the Berlin Wall to lock Germany irrevocably into Europe. It was not done for economic reasons,” he said.

Ben Simpfendorfer, Asia economist for RBS and an expert on the Middle East, told the FIKR conference that the rise of China had paradoxically disrupted the case for pan-Arab economic integration.

There was a natural fit ten years ago between rich oil state and low-wage manufacturers in Egypt and Syria, but cheap exports from China have forced poorer Arab states to retreat behind barriers to shelter their industries. “The rationale for a single currency has become weaker,” he said.

The GCC also agreed to create a joint military strike force – akin to the EU’s rapid reaction force – to tackle threats such as the incursion of Yemeni Shiite rebels into Saudi territory earlier this year.

This is a major breakthrough after years of deadlock on defence cooperation.

The Sunni Gulf states are deeply concerned about the great power ambitions of Shiite Iran and its quest for nuclear weapons, to the point where the theme of a possible war between Iran and a Saudi-led constellation of states has crept into the media debate.

They nevertheless repeated on Tuesday that “any military action against Iran” by Western powers would be unacceptable.
 

FaaR

Golden Member
Dec 28, 2007
1,056
412
136
Yeah, go on and blame it all on Obama. The man's only been in office for (less than) a year, and look! He's managed to ruin freedom with his communist plot to impose health care for those who previously could not afford it, ruin the economy with a global recession which he admittedly did not create but surely is to blame for anyway, the federal budget by inheriting fiscally ruinous policies from his predecessor and thus must stand accountable for, and now the US currency as well which has already been weakening for the better part of this decade thanks to the warmongering ineptitude of admitted cokehead GWB, but since he's black and a liberal must be the one whom is to fault anyway. Wow. I'm amazed at your deductive powers of reasoning!

*rolleyes*
 

CrackRabbit

Lifer
Mar 30, 2001
16,641
58
91
You don't read very well do you PJABBER?
You seemed to of just read the Anti-Obama title and ran with it.

Yet hurdles are formidable even for the tight-knit group of Gulf states. While the eurozone is a club of rough equals – with Germany, France, Italy, and Spain each holding two votes on the ECB council – the Gulf currency will be dominated by Saudi Arabia. The risk is that other countries will feel like satellites. Monetary policy will inevitably be set for Riyadh’s needs.

And that right there is a an one of many excellent reasons why the "Gulfo" will never happen.
Even if the currency does come in to being I highly doubt it will be a threat to the Dollar or Euro as reserve currencies.
 

PJABBER

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
4,822
0
0
You don't read very well do you PJABBER?
You seemed to of just read the Anti-Obama title and ran with it.

And that right there is a an one of many excellent reasons why the "Gulfo" will never happen.
Even if the currency does come in to being I highly doubt it will be a threat to the Dollar or Euro as reserve currencies.

The attempts to establish a "Gulfo" and other actions are all international reactions to bad American fiscal policy. The Chinese are lecturing the U.S. on capitalism, the Europeans are aghast at the profligacy of U.S. government debt-financed spending and the South Americans are wondering why the U.S. is following the path that led so any of those countries into financial ruin.

These are expressions of doubt and concern. If you have no concern, you are part of the problem.
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Bush may have started it.. but he was just getting going.. Obama slammed the pedal to the metal and has taken every bad Bush policy and multiplied it by 4.. Obama is supposed to be fixing this shit, not making it worse.. The massive spending of the Obama administration is causing the $ to implode.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
348
126
Bush may have started it.. but he was just getting going.. Obama slammed the pedal to the metal and has taken every bad Bush policy and multiplied it by 4.. Obama is supposed to be fixing this shit, not making it worse.. The massive spending of the Obama administration is causing the $ to implode.

Total BS.

Bush's TARP funding - if you think it was a mistake - was not repeated or multiplied by Obama. Obama's stimulus spending was better for the country - or less bad if you prefer - than TARP.

It's easy to forget the horrible policies Republicans would have done that aren't being done.

Beside that, Dems have pushed through *some* ethics and transparency reforms, are about to pass a healthcare bill that's mixed and gutted but has some good, a credit card reform bill that has good reforms but got rid of some, and a finance reform bill that is similar good but has too many loopholes. Obama took some drastic measures to save some big companies like GM, and that's gone pretty well, as did cash for clunkers.

Where's Obama's four times worse tarp? His fur times worse of Bush's appointing over 200 industry representitives of those industries who donated to Republicans? Obama's four times worse at politicizing the Justice Department attorneys and firing several who refused to behave corruptly (whih says something about the 100 who weren't fired)? (In fact I'm unhappy with Obama for not replacing Bush attorneys like Presidents normally do). Where's Obama's four times worse push for further market deregulation, his four times worse tax cut for the rich?
 

CrackRabbit

Lifer
Mar 30, 2001
16,641
58
91
The attempts to establish a "Gulfo" and other actions are all international reactions to bad American fiscal policy. The Chinese are lecturing the U.S. on capitalism, the Europeans are aghast at the profligacy of U.S. government debt-financed spending and the South Americans are wondering why the U.S. is following the path that led so any of those countries into financial ruin.

These are expressions of doubt and concern. If you have no concern, you are part of the problem.

Let them lecture, for all of their bluster they are no better off than us. The Chinese have a corpratocracy on a much worse scale than anything the biggest leftist in the US could dream of. The Europeans are in just as much debt as we are, if not worse. And the South Americans are up to their armpits in leftist dictator wannabes.
So who are they to criticize how our government is handling itself?
 

PJABBER

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
4,822
0
0
Let them lecture, for all of their bluster they are no better off than us. The Chinese have a corpratocracy on a much worse scale than anything the biggest leftist in the US could dream of. The Europeans are in just as much debt as we are, if not worse. And the South Americans are up to their armpits in leftist dictator wannabes.
So who are they to criticize how our government is handling itself?

I would think that anyone who holds U.S. debt has a right to chime in -

http://www.ustreas.gov/tic/mfh.txt
 
Status
Not open for further replies.