- Mar 8, 2003
- 38,416
- 4
- 0
Originally posted by: randumb
not an mmo...it's like Diablo
Originally posted by: Bateluer
Just what we need, another Diablo clone.
Give it a rest already people. Diablo 1 was good for the RPG market because it distilled the genre down to the bare essentials. Diablo 2 was bad for the RPG genre because it pretty much sucked. No dialogue, no story, lousy visuals(D1 looked better), took 3 patches for online play to be feasible, God, I hate that game! You can't even call D2 an RPG. It bears more in common with Quake than an RPG.
I want more BG2s, more PS:Ts, more Fallouts! If you must make an action RPG, then make it like the IWD series. Both games actually had dialogue and story telling. And with a 6 person party, the battles were awesome, unlike the click fests of D1 and 2.
/rant
Originally posted by: skace
I played GW world premier. It is deffinitely not an MMORPG and while I don't think saying "it is diablo" is completely accurate, I wouldn't say it is that far off base.
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Originally posted by: skace
I played GW world premier. It is deffinitely not an MMORPG and while I don't think saying "it is diablo" is completely accurate, I wouldn't say it is that far off base.
from what i read, everything seems to be instanced. That would limit the amount of people around you greatly.
Originally posted by: malak
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Originally posted by: skace
I played GW world premier. It is deffinitely not an MMORPG and while I don't think saying "it is diablo" is completely accurate, I wouldn't say it is that far off base.
from what i read, everything seems to be instanced. That would limit the amount of people around you greatly.
The only time you are around everyone is basically a graphical lobby compared to other games. You only actually play the game with a single group, much like starting a new game in Diablo and other RPG's work.
Originally posted by: Jumpem
Are you forced to group like in WoW?
You can hire npcs to flesh out your group though they won't be as good as a skilled player.Originally posted by: Jumpem
Are you forced to group like in WoW?
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Are you complaining that WoW does not have enough solo content?
If you think you are forced to group in WoW, play you some EQ and tell me what you think about WoW after that. I dont understand why people hate grouping.... i mean if you did not want to group and just solo the entire game, why not just play Morrowind?
Originally posted by: Nohr
You can hire npcs to flesh out your group though they won't be as good as a skilled player.
I couldn't tell you. I've only played for a few hours total during beta weekends. It's just an option I know is available.Originally posted by: Jumpem
So the answer is, that I can't make it through the game and own alone?Originally posted by: Nohr
You can hire npcs to flesh out your group though they won't be as good as a skilled player.
Originally posted by: Jumpem
Originally posted by: Nohr
You can hire npcs to flesh out your group though they won't be as good as a skilled player.
So the answer is, that I can't make it through the game and own alone?
Originally posted by: Litchfield285
Why would you even consider buying a game called Guildwars, thats biggest selling point is large group based pvp? lol
If you want to solo, obviously do not buy guildwars...
Originally posted by: Jumpem
Originally posted by: Litchfield285
Why would you even consider buying a game called Guildwars, thats biggest selling point is large group based pvp? lol
If you want to solo, obviously do not buy guildwars...
I like rpg's. The single player variety seems to be limited lately.
Originally posted by: spunkz
the pvp is awesome and the game as a whole definately has promise, but after playing WoW, the movement feels very restricting and buggy.
it suckedOriginally posted by: malak
Originally posted by: Bateluer
Just what we need, another Diablo clone.
Give it a rest already people. Diablo 1 was good for the RPG market because it distilled the genre down to the bare essentials. Diablo 2 was bad for the RPG genre because it pretty much sucked. No dialogue, no story, lousy visuals(D1 looked better), took 3 patches for online play to be feasible, God, I hate that game! You can't even call D2 an RPG. It bears more in common with Quake than an RPG.
I want more BG2s, more PS:Ts, more Fallouts! If you must make an action RPG, then make it like the IWD series. Both games actually had dialogue and story telling. And with a 6 person party, the battles were awesome, unlike the click fests of D1 and 2.
/rant
Guildwars is not a diablo clone in ANY way. The interface is completely different, the gameplay is completely different, it has an actual story...
Don't give up on Guildwars, it'll probably be pretty good.