- Jan 17, 2008
- 2,471
- 38
- 91
Hello all!
I have a rare opportunity to score a GTX 690 for a decent price. Thing is, I'm not really desperate for a new GPU (have a 7950 3GB GPU) but have considered upgrading if the right opportunity came along.
My only concern is that I'm gaming at 2560x1440, and seeing that the GTX 690 has 2GB vRAM per GPU makes me question this cards sustainability. I'm not questioning the GPU performance itself by today's standards (I've done a lot of research and the 690 still trumps the 780 and Titan at 1440p) but i'm worried about being vRAM starved in games later this year or next year.
Thoughts? Is the 690 still a viable option in the market given the vRAM limitation? Will sheer GPU horsepower make up for it?
I have a rare opportunity to score a GTX 690 for a decent price. Thing is, I'm not really desperate for a new GPU (have a 7950 3GB GPU) but have considered upgrading if the right opportunity came along.
My only concern is that I'm gaming at 2560x1440, and seeing that the GTX 690 has 2GB vRAM per GPU makes me question this cards sustainability. I'm not questioning the GPU performance itself by today's standards (I've done a lot of research and the 690 still trumps the 780 and Titan at 1440p) but i'm worried about being vRAM starved in games later this year or next year.
Thoughts? Is the 690 still a viable option in the market given the vRAM limitation? Will sheer GPU horsepower make up for it?