• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

GTX 660 vs GTX 550 TI

for sc2 "only". all you need is a 550TI. put the rest of your money into the fastest cpu you can buy.

run a i7-3770k with 680sli and in large heated battles. frame dip to the low 20. cpu usage is at a pathetic 45% (basically maxed out on 2 core) and gpu is 35% on each (extreme setting with AA).
sc2 is a piss poor optimized game (think blizzard intended it to be that way).
 
Last edited:
Starcraft 2 is pretty CPU bottlenecked.

If you look at Tomshardware 1080p benchmarks:

GTX 580: 104.6 fps
GTX Titan: 104.22 fps
GTX 680: 103.97 fps
GTX 670: 103.92 fps
GTX 550Ti: 103.54 fps
GTX 660Ti: 102.93 fps

http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2012-vga-gpgpu/12-Starcraft-2-DirectX-11-B-Performance,2965.html

It can be a lot worse than that with the wrong CPU, the 8350 only averages 47.9 fps at high settings, so could actually bottleneck a 550 Ti.

Ideally you want something like an i5 3470 or higher. Something with decent IPC and 4 or more cores.
 
for sc2 "only". all you need is a 550TI. put the rest of your money into the fastest cpu you can buy.

run a i7-3770k with 680sli and in large heated battles. frame dip to the low 20. cpu usage is at a pathetic 45% (basically maxed out on 2 core) and gpu is 35% on each (extreme setting with AA).
sc2 is a piss poor optimized game (think blizzard intended it to be that way).

Maybe you should turn off SLI, then a single 680 can boost faster and you should have better framerate, I don't think SLI works in SC2.
 
SLI works perfectly with SC2.

with single GPU. same results for CPU. GPU is now 55%.

simply not enough CPU to feed GPU for more frames.
 
Back
Top