GTX 560 ( SE ) Review: Mid Range Maddness

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gordon Freemen

Golden Member
May 24, 2012
1,068
0
0
GTX 560 ( SE ) Review: Mid Range Maddness

Today I would like to review the GTX 560 SE flavor of Nvidia's ever popular "fermi" GF114 lineup. This review is for those in the market for a solid mid range card as well for those just into computer tech and PC gaming in general. There was almost nothing as far as real reviews or articles about this card so I took it into my own hands to present to you a best representation of what I can offer as far as a solid review given my limited resources and formal training this is my first time so please go easy on me.

That being said lets get into the nitty gritty which is the specifications and performance numbers and games used to benchmark with. Please keep in mind that I do not have every game that was ever made or to be considered good benchmarking material however I will try my best with what I have and please if you have a game in mind that you would like benched that I did not test with here let me know cause I might own it.

So lets get to the GPU specs shall we -

Desktop_2012_06_02_16_29_50_430-1.png


So as we can see above the GTX 560 SE is a cut down version of the GF114 GTX 560 non Ti or even more similar to the GF 104 GTX 460 SE and probable most important to realize is the cut down Shaders from the 336 on the regular GTX 560 down to 288 Shaders so lets move on to see how 48 less shaders and 192bit bus vs 256bit bus perform.

Test Setup:
Monitor - Samsung SyncMaster 226BW 2ms 60hz 1680x1050 "Mid Range" resolution

Processor - AMD Phenom II x4 B55 @ 3.6Ghz

CPU Cooler - CM Hyper 212+

Motherboard - Msi 870 -G45

Memory - 4GB DDR3 single stick corsair @ 1333 nothing special

Hard Drive - A few old and slow WD and Segate 7200rpm

GPU - EVGA nvidia GeForce GTX 560 SE 1GB GDDR5

Power Supply - Cool Master RS 460

System Software And Drivers:

Operating System - Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64

Graphics Driver - 301.42 WHQL

NVIDIA Control Panel Settings - Default unless specified

Games tested & in game settings used:

Note the method used was to try and find the best balance of image quality and performance so highest in game settings were not always an option at this price point of $130 retail. However nice settings are always an option with this card with Ultra a viable option in many older titles and some new. Also note all games were tested at monitors native resolution of 1680x1050 60hz.

Benchmark Results:

S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call of Pripyat - In game settings were set to one notch below maximum and on DX10 instead of DX11 to maintain playable and smooth game play experience. The lowest frame rate I seen was about 33fps as captured below but game play was smooth and fluid furthermore if you desire 60fps solid with no drops that is also an option if you turn off some of the high end graphical settings but game will still look great.
xrEngine_2012_06_02_17_45_23_966-1.png


Metro 2033 - This game surprised me and it still looks great one of the best IMO visually speaking even still today. That being said the lowest frame rate I seen in game using the settings below was 28fps just for a split second however I was not quick enough on the screen capture hot key LOL but the game ran anywhere between 30 - 60fps on these still great looking settings.
Metro2033_2012_06_02_18_01_11_423.png

Metro2033_2012_06_02_18_05_47_489.png





The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim - This game ran surprisingly GREAT Bethesda must have fixed the game because it used to run like crap but now it runs at full 60fps everywhere except in towns where it infrequently drops to mid 40s fps. I also had 8x Supersampling on in the nvidia control panel just for this game because it can with no performance hit.
Desktop_2012_06_02_18_34_52_130.png

TESV_2012_06_02_18_28_16_649.png


Far Cry® 2 - ran on great on Ultra settings albeit with some minor dips in frame rate when the action heated up otherwise a solid well optimized 60fps is seen throught the majority of the game. I cant wait for Far Cry 3.
Desktop_2012_06_02_18_50_19_142.png


Grand Theft Auto IV - ran quite well given the fact it is a very poor console port but still runs decent enough on high settings. Max Payne what ! I cant wait for GTA V ftw!
GTAIV_2012_06_02_19_03_01_006.png

GTAIV_2012_06_02_19_04_42_753.png


WoW - every setting on Ultra with shadows on High nets 60fps everywhere 55fps in Stormwind on peak server time enough said LOL.
Wow_2012_06_03_12_17_43_720.png


Conclusion:
I recommend the EVGA GTX 560 SE to anyone looking for a solid performance on a budget with a monitor resolution of 1680x1050 it is a rock solid card with a grate price to performance ratio and for $130 retail you cannot go wrong. In SLI this card should perform just like a GTX 580 albeit for much less money. Also remember that Radeon has some great performing mid range options as well including the 6850 and 7770. The max temperature that I have got this GPU up to is 71c and that was with the fan on auto @ 33% under max gaming load and it is near silent. The card when on the desktop idle has a fan speed of 25% and is dead silent and normally runs in the low 30c range. So I wish this information helps someone make a more educated choice if they are in the market for a new card because there are literally next to nothing for reviews on this card :)
 
Last edited:

Jaydip

Diamond Member
Mar 29, 2010
3,691
21
81
GTX 560 ( SE ) Review: Mid Range Maddness

Today I would like to review the GTX 560 SE flavor of Nvidia's ever popular "fermi" GF114 lineup. This review is for those in the market for a solid mid range card as well for those just into computer tech and PC gaming in general. There was almost nothing as far as real reviews or articles about this card so I took it into my own hands to present to you a best representation of what I can offer as far as a solid review given my limited resources and formal training this is my first time so please go easy on me.

That being said lets get into the nitty gritty which is the specifications and performance numbers and games used to benchmark with. Please keep in mind that I do not have every game that was ever made or to be considered good benchmarking material however I will try my best with what I have and please if you have a game in mind that you would like benched that I did not test with here let me know cause I might own it.

So lets get to the GPU specs shall we -

Desktop_2012_06_02_16_29_50_430-1.png


So as we can see above the GTX 560 SE is a cut down version of the GF114 GTX 560 non Ti or even more similar to the GF 104 GTX 460 SE and probable most important to realize is the cut down Shaders from the 336 on the regular GTX 560 down to 288 Shaders so lets move on to see how 48 less shaders and 192bit bus vs 256bit bus perform.

Test Setup:
Monitor - Samsung SyncMaster 226BW 2ms 60hz 1680x1050 "Mid Range" resolution

Processor - AMD Phenom II x4 B55 @ 3.6Ghz

CPU Cooler - CM Hyper 212+

Motherboard - Msi 870 -G45

Memory - 4GB DDR3 single stick corsair @ 1333 nothing special

Hard Drive - A few old and slow WD and Segate 7200rpm

GPU - EVGA nvidia GeForce GTX 560 SE 1GB GDDR5

Power Supply - Cool Master RS 460

System Software And Drivers:

Operating System - Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64

Graphics Driver - 301.42 WHQL

NVIDIA Control Panel Settings - Default unless specified

Games tested & in game settings used:

Note the method used was to try and find the best balance of image quality and performance so highest in game settings were not always an option at this price point of $130 retail. However nice settings are always an option with this card with Ultra a viable option in many older titles and some new. Also note all games were tested at monitors native resolution of 1680x1050 60hz.

Benchmark Results:

S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call of Pripyat - In game settings were set to one notch below maximum and on DX10 instead of DX11 to maintain playable and smooth game play experience. The lowest frame rate I seen was about 33fps as captured below but game play was smooth and fluid furthermore if you desire 60fps solid with no drops that is also an option if you turn off some of the high end graphical settings but game will still look great.
xrEngine_2012_06_02_17_45_23_966-1.png


Metro 2033 - This game surprised me and it still looks great one of the best IMO visually speaking even still today. That being said the lowest frame rate I seen in game using the settings below was 28fps just for a split second however I was not quick enough on the screen capture hot key LOL but the game ran anywhere between 30 - 60fps on these still great looking settings.
Metro2033_2012_06_02_18_01_11_423.png

Metro2033_2012_06_02_18_05_47_489.png

Metro2033_2012_06_02_18_13_43_026.png




The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim - This game ran surprisingly GREAT Bethesda must have fixed the game because it used to run like crap but now it runs at full 60fps everywhere except in towns where it infrequently drops to mid 40s fps. I also had 8x Supersampling on in the nvidia control panel just for this game because it can with no performance hit.
Desktop_2012_06_02_18_34_52_130.png

TESV_2012_06_02_18_28_16_649.png


Far Cry® 2 - ran on great on Ultra settings albeit with some minor dips in frame rate when the action heated up otherwise a solid well optimized 60fps is seen throught the majority of the game. I cant wait for Far Cry 3.
Desktop_2012_06_02_18_50_19_142.png


Grand Theft Auto IV - ran quite well given the fact it is a very poor console port but still runs decent enough on high settings. Max Payne what ! I cant wait for GTA V ftw!
GTAIV_2012_06_02_19_03_01_006.png



WoW - every setting on Ultra with shadows on High nets 60fps everywhere 55fps in Stormwind on peak server time enough said LOL.

Conclusion:
I recommend the EVGA GTX 560 SE to anyone looking for a solid performance on a budget with a monitor resolution of 1680x1050 it is a rock solid card with a grate price to performance ratio and for $130 retail you cannot go wrong. In SLI this card should perform just like a GTX 580 albeit for much less money. Also remember that Radeon has some great performing mid range options as well including the 6850 and 7770. The max temperature that I have got this GPU up to is 71c and that was with the fan on auto @ 33% under max gaming load and it is near silent. The card when on the desktop idle has a fan speed of 25% and is dead silent and normally runs in the low 30c range. So I wish this information helps someone make a more educated choice if they are in the market for a new card because there are literally next to nothing for reviews on this card :)
I like ur results and efforts :thumbsup: but just don't agree with the bold part.The avg fps may be better but I have seen benchmarks where the minimums are worse than 580 even for a 560 Ti SLI setup.
 

Gordon Freemen

Golden Member
May 24, 2012
1,068
0
0
I like ur results and efforts :thumbsup: but just don't agree with the bold part.The avg fps may be better but I have seen benchmarks where the minimums are worse than 580 even for a 560 Ti SLI setup.
I guarantee that it would be an excellently high end experience in SLI. Benchmarks to come in the future when I SLI this puppy we will find out for sure but I am pretty sure the SLI Scaling will be great in many games but not all.
 

Gordon Freemen

Golden Member
May 24, 2012
1,068
0
0

Jaydip

Diamond Member
Mar 29, 2010
3,691
21
81
U r welcome,it was getting quite boring with all the 7970,680,670,7850 numbers :p.It has been a refreshing change.
 

Gordon Freemen

Golden Member
May 24, 2012
1,068
0
0
U r welcome,it was getting quite boring with all the 7970,680,670,7850 numbers :p.It has been a refreshing change.
Most people even though we all talk allot about these high end cards end up getting something in the mid range. Steam hardware survey states that the 5770,6770 is the most used card as of currently. Some other mid range cards like the 6870, 6850, GTX 560, are also most popular but the high end cards in reality account for very little of market share just like HD+ monitors. Personally my days of going high end are over it's just not worth it IMO.
 

Leyawiin

Diamond Member
Nov 11, 2008
3,204
52
91
You can get a GTX 460 1GB 192 Bit which is also a GF114 card and has 336 shaders (like the GTX 560). There's an MSI version for $129.99 with a $20 rebate.
 

Gordon Freemen

Golden Member
May 24, 2012
1,068
0
0
You can get a GTX 460 1GB 192 Bit which is also a GF114 card and has 336 shaders (like the GTX 560). There's an MSI version for $129.99 with a $20 rebate.
Ya I considered one but they were $150 were I was buying from plus the 5xx series have better driver support. Also I only buy EVGA when I go with Nvidia.
 

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
I guarantee that it would be an excellently high end experience in SLI. Benchmarks to come in the future when I SLI this puppy we will find out for sure but I am pretty sure the SLI Scaling will be great in many games but not all.

Yes but you will be stuck with 1gb of vram and all the drawbacks of sli.

A 7850 would outperform that setup in every way for less money as well, so long as you overclock it.
 

Gordon Freemen

Golden Member
May 24, 2012
1,068
0
0
Yes but you will be stuck with 1gb of vram and all the drawbacks of sli.

A 7850 would outperform that setup in every way for less money as well, so long as you overclock it.
Good thing I am happy with 16080x1050 ultra fast 2ms response time with excellent color reproduction and blacks. Also I dont mind turning the settings down to "High" to maintain flawless performance and I rather keep my 1050P Ultra high performance monitor over most peoples generic meh performing 1080P screens from the likes of HP,Acer ect. Thanx for the comment :)
 

borisvodofsky

Diamond Member
Feb 12, 2010
3,606
0
0
I prefer "Sexy Edition" :) thanx for the comment

So you came in here to stroke your budget e-peen, hoping some other broke-ass hardware enthusiast would come join you for a circle jerk. :'(

I don't understand this mentality. Computer hardware is by far one of the cheapest most accessible hobbies; a few weeks of Top-Ramen, and you'll have pretty much the BEST computer among the 99th percentile.

Why do you people insist on buying budget hardware that you yourselves are not truly happy with.

You justify it by saying it reduces cost, but in terms of true comparisons, the performance to price ratio, the guys with budget hardware are paying significantly MORE. :colbert:


Thread crapping is not allowed.


Learn to express your opinions in a more constructive, less hostile manner, and learn to accept that not everybody will think as you do.

Moderator jvroig
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Zanovar

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2011
3,446
232
106
So you came in here to stroke your budget e-peen, hoping some other broke-ass hardware enthusiast would come join you for a circle jerk. :'(

I don't understand this mentality. Computer hardware is by far one of the cheapest most accessible hobbies; a few weeks of Top-Ramen, and you'll have pretty much the BEST computer among the 99th percentile.

Why do you people insist on buying budget hardware that you yourselves are not truly happy with.

You justify it by saying it reduces cost, but in terms of true comparisons, the performance to price ratio, the guys with budget hardware are paying significantly MORE. :colbert:

Give the guy a break dude,i love stuff like this and your gonna scare them all off:(
 

blastingcap

Diamond Member
Sep 16, 2010
6,654
5
76
Computer hardware is by far one of the cheapest most accessible hobbies; a few weeks of Top-Ramen, and you'll have pretty much the BEST computer among the 99th percentile.

This entire thread is of dubious value, since the actual price of a GTX 560 Sucky Edition is almost $140 when including shipping at newegg right now. You can get a HD7770 for $120 after rebate, or HD 6850 for about $120 after rebate, or GTX 560 (non-Ti) or HD 6870 at around the same price as a $140 GTX 560 Sucky Edition (depending on what sales are running). The HD7770 will draw a lot less power and the others will either cost less or run faster or both.

However, the value of this thread shot up with Boris's quote. Do you mind if I quote you in my sig Boris? :)


This post is an example of thread crapping and thread derailment rolled into one, and is not allowed.

Moderator jvroig
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Gordon Freemen

Golden Member
May 24, 2012
1,068
0
0
This entire thread is of dubious value, since the actual price of a GTX 560 Sucky Edition is almost $140 when including shipping at newegg right now. You can get a HD7770 for $120 after rebate, or HD 6850 for about $120 after rebate, or GTX 560 (non-Ti) or HD 6870 at around the same price as a $140 GTX 560 Sucky Edition (depending on what sales are running). The HD7770 will draw a lot less power and the others will either cost less or run faster or both.

However, the value of this thread shot up with Boris's quote. Do you mind if I quote you in my sig Boris? :)
What if I told you I did not pay for this GPU and it was $137 all in "Out the door" thanx for the commentary.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.