GTX 465 For PhysX

3lackDeath

Junior Member
Feb 6, 2012
10
0
0
My main card is currently the Radeon Gigabyte 7970 OC but i also want an nvidia card to be used for PhysX purposes.

What do you guys think of that card as a dedicated physx card?, my budget for this is under $100, cant remember where but some dude was using a 8800 gtx for physx only and he was happy.

Feel free to give suggestions...
 

boxleitnerb

Platinum Member
Nov 1, 2011
2,605
6
81
PhysX requires compute power only. Therefore -> Kepler. Much less power consumption than the cards you mentioned and still faster. GT640 would be a good bet. Memory bandwidth is basically irrelevant for PhysX, so the DDR3 version is fine.
 

3lackDeath

Junior Member
Feb 6, 2012
10
0
0
I looked at the GT640 and some others but i'm still not sure what i'll be going with so i'm going check around a bit more as there is no rush, thanks for your input though
 

Face2Face

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2001
4,100
215
106
PhysX requires compute power only. Therefore -> Kepler. Much less power consumption than the cards you mentioned and still faster. GT640 would be a good bet. Memory bandwidth is basically irrelevant for PhysX, so the DDR3 version is fine.

I thought Kepler has less compute power than Fermi?
 

boxleitnerb

Platinum Member
Nov 1, 2011
2,605
6
81
I thought Kepler has less compute power than Fermi?

On paper they don't, they have more SP GFLOPs. It depends on the workload if they can use that efficiently. The smaller Keplers have smaller caches and less registers than GF110 and GK110, thus in some workloads they are slower. But PhysX shouldn't be one of them.
 

Jimzz

Diamond Member
Oct 23, 2012
4,399
190
106
Get a cheap GTX650. Lower power draw than older cards and will work fine for what you want. Can be had under $100 AR.

Or try and find a cheap used GTX460. More power draw but maybe cheaper. Not sure what they are going for right now.
 

Face2Face

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2001
4,100
215
106
On paper they don't, they have more SP GFLOPs. It depends on the workload if they can use that efficiently. The smaller Keplers have smaller caches and less registers than GF110 and GK110, thus in some workloads they are slower. But PhysX shouldn't be one of them.

Interesting. Thanks for the info!
 

3lackDeath

Junior Member
Feb 6, 2012
10
0
0
I was lucky enough to get a used GTX 460 on ebay for $80, will do an update when i get it.

Still need to figure out out to run them together...