GTX 285 2GB tested

[thilanliyan]

http://en.expreview.com/2009/0...hmarked.html#more-2714

Unfortunately no 2560 benchmarks.

 

[allies]

Haha... no 2560 benchies? Weird.

Seeing some decent gains with 1900x1200 and high amounts of AA, would just expect the gap to further widen at 2560x1600.

 

[alcoholbob]

16Q benchmarks lol only if you plan on frying some eggs on your GPU and listen to the sweet joy of 100% fan noise.

 

[BFG10K]

In addition to 2560x1600, I'd have liked to see more games used too.

 

[nyker96]

i can see WIC is pretty starved of video ram at hi rez, the extra gb helped quite a bit. but other games not as much.

 

[Denithor]

Just don't use one of these on XP32 unless you like having 1.5GHz usable system memory.

 

[error8]

It's pretty dumb not to benchmark a 2gb card at 2560X1200. Why would one consider buying it, if not for the uber high resolutions gaming!?

 

[magreen]

Yeah, the review site needs to be able to afford a monitor that can do 2560 b4 they can test it.

 

[darXoul]

Wow, a horrible "review". No 2560*1600 or GTA IV benchmarks, probably exaggerated AA settings in 1920*1200 in Crysis and 2 GB RAM + 2.66 GHz CPU used. Meh.

OTOH, I don't expect wonders... Looks like nothing this round will be compelling enough to upgrade my 280 :/ GT300 better come on time.

 

[OCGuy]

Originally posted by: error8
It's pretty dumb not to benchmark a 2gb card at 2560X1200. Why would one consider buying it, if not for the uber high resolutions gaming!?

Because 2 > 1, duh!