GT1030 for desktop 4k - decent call or missed a trick?

planetf1

Junior Member
Apr 8, 2006
3
0
66
I'm after a little advice. I bought a GT1030 last week. Let me explain why:

- I have a Gigabyte Z97X-SLI board with a Intel 4790k cpu (not overclocked), 16 GB ram. PSU is decently beefy but I'd have to check what (novatech prebuild).
- PC is mostly used for "desktop" apps, some coding, music, videos, writing docs, lots of web browsing, a little virtualization. Also photo cataloguing/editing in lightroom, occasional photoshop
- I had a new 4k display (LG 27UD88) arrive last week
- The built in Intel 4600 display struggled with even a 4K desktop. Refresh was capped at 30 Hz and everything felt very laggy, even with max "video ram"
- I searched on amazon, but confused at the sheer number of options went with something at the cheaper end, 4K support, passive - quite happy with not getting more fan noise, though existing PSU and to a lesser extent processor fan are audible!
- noticed 1030 just released, and amazon was telling me "order in next 5 mins to get tomorrow" .. so I did
- actual card is GT1030-SL-2G-BRK GDDR5

Desktop seems to work "just fine" at 4k/60Hz over HDMI 2 & is smooth and snappy, a way away from the intel's performance

So that's the back story, but I can return within 30 days, so I'm now wondering if I made a sensible choice. For desktop, video use would the experts here recommend other options. I'm not totally against a fan design if not too loud under desktop use . I spent ~ 70 ukp on the asus passive gt1030 card, I wouldn't want to go much above this. 90 perhaps? I did read the ATI RX550s were decent, but years ago ati drivers were abysmal, and that's what I remember, whilst nvidia seem decent (that being said the LG monitor I think has freesync, nothing nvidia though since I don't game I guess who cares!). 2GB feels a little tight, but it seems quite a big step up in price to get 3GB/4GB (I notice netflix want 3GB for their 4k pc service)

Feedback/comments welcome :)
 

nvgpu

Senior member
Sep 12, 2014
629
202
81
https://www.msi.com/Graphics-card/GeForce-GT-1030-2GH-LP-OC.html

You should have gotten the MSI card with DP1.4 output instead, the DVI output on GT 1030 is limited to 1920x1080/1200 max because single-link only.

Cards with DP output can go all the way to 4K 60-120Hz and 5K 60Hz on DP1.4 monitor and MSI is the only card vendor that makes a DP1.4 output card atm.

By the way, can you please run DXVA Checker on the GT 1030?

http://bluesky23.yukishigure.com/en/DXVAChecker.html

Curious to see what GT 1030 reports for its hardware decoding support.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nathanddrews

nathanddrews

Graphics Cards, CPU Moderator
Aug 9, 2016
965
534
136
www.youtube.com
I'll second returning it in favor of a model that has both DP 1.4 and HDMI 2.0 rather than DVI if only because the conversion of DP to DVI is a simple and cheap one. If you plan on keeping this as a display adapter for some time, that is.
 

GreenOrbs

Member
Aug 13, 2013
125
3
81
The card has an HDMI 2.0 output which is fine for 4K output at 60 Hz. Your monitor has a 60Hz refresh rate so you will be fine if you use the HDMI port. As the person above mentioned the DVI port is not good for 4K. I sometimes forget which output type supports--the following link may be helpful.

http://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/1312-cables-dvi-differences-hdmi-vs-displayport

As to drivers, AMD used to be pretty terrible but they have made an effort to improve and recently its been good. In the last year, I've used computers with a GTX 950, 1060, and 1070 on the NVIDIA side and the R7 370 and the RX 480 on the AMD side. The drivers perform similarly but I do like the NVIDIA implementation for multiple monitors better-- you can chose to maximize windows to just one screen rather than filling all of them. As to the RX 550, the performance is basically the same as the 1030.
 

planetf1

Junior Member
Apr 8, 2006
3
0
66
Here's the output from the tool as requested:

NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
MPEG2and1_VLD: DXVA2/D3D11, SD / HD / FHD / 4K
MPEG2_VLD: DXVA2/D3D11, SD / HD / FHD / 4K
MPEG1_VLD: DXVA2/D3D11, SD / HD / FHD / 4K
VC1_VLD2010: DXVA2/D3D11, SD / HD / FHD
VC1_VLD: DXVA2/D3D11, SD / HD / FHD
32FCFE3F-DE46-4A49-861B-AC71110649D5: DXVA2/D3D11
H264_VLD_Stereo_Progressive_NoFGT: DXVA2/D3D11, SD / HD / FHD / 4K
H264_VLD_Stereo_NoFGT: DXVA2/D3D11, SD / HD / FHD / 4K
H264_VLD_NoFGT: DXVA2/D3D11, SD / HD / FHD / 4K
HEVC_VLD_Main: DXVA2/D3D11, SD / HD / FHD / 4K / 8K
HEVC_VLD_Main10: DXVA2/D3D11, SD / HD / FHD / 4K / 8K
20BB8B0A-97AA-4571-8E99-64E60606C1A6: DXVA2/D3D11
15DF9B21-06C4-47F1-841E-A67C97D7F312: DXVA2/D3D11
MPEG4pt2_VLD_Simple: DXVA2/D3D11, SD / HD / FHD
MPEG4pt2_VLD_AdvSimple_NoGMC: DXVA2/D3D11, SD / HD / FHD
9947EC6F-689B-11DC-A320-0019DBBC4184: DXVA2/D3D11
MJPEG_VLD_NVIDIA: DXVA2/D3D11, SD / HD / FHD / 4K
VP9_VLD_Profile0: DXVA2/D3D11, SD / HD / FHD / 4K / 8K
VP9_VLD_10bit_Profile2: DXVA2/D3D11, SD / HD / FHD / 4K / 8K
DDA19DC7-93B5-49F5-A9B3-2BDA28A2CE6E: DXVA2/D3D11
914C84A3-4078-4FA9-984C-E2F262CB5C9C: DXVA2/D3D11
4B2E068F-396A-43DF-B86B-7DC6D2B6726A: DXVA1
312B6A3A-41DE-4A43-9C0F-FB3D5F0DFB9A: DXVA1

At least that's specifically the format support - were there other tabs you were interested in.

Still with the asus card for me. If I was choosing again I'd likely go MSI for the reasons mentioned, but HDMI 2 is fine for me