I think you'd need to define feminine, and 'without a dad'. Many people have a father living with them but he's not around or not a part of the upbringing (the same can be said about moms too). You'd have to study and define this before you could make any kind of informed statements about it. Is an hour of quality time a day with a dad more influential than 6 hours with someone who's not all there, etc. And what is feminine? Many men don't like what our culture dictates are normal 'manly' interests. Me for instance. I HATE sports, have very little interest in cars/hunting/fishing/etc, love poetry, am a romantic, and many other classicly 'feminine' pursuits. That being said I'm not 'effeminate' in manner or action...I'm a long time martial art fanatic, like action shows, super-horny heterosexual, etc. And for the record, I had a father (who hunted, fished, was into sports, etc), and he was VERY involved in my life.
What makes us who we are is actually inside us from birth, and neither family nor societal interactions will often change that too dramatically. Personality wise I'm an introvert with strong feelings...by meyers/briggs definitions I'm an INFP (with very very strong INTP tendancies but we won't hijack the thread to get into a Jungian debate). That's what gives me my preferences (it's not the only thing of course, but it's a major conrtibutor). I could have been raised by Randy Savage or in Soviet Russia, I'd still be the same basic person inside as I am now. I know that these statements will get any sociologists up in arms, and I'm sorry about that, but it's the only reasonable argument given the vast majority of existing research elements.