you actually sound like the weak link based on your own description. are you typically an A/B student?
Yes I am, and in this case there is a chance that I was the weak link. Like I said, their expectations of my role and what I was supposed to do constantly kept changing.
My original aspect of the project was research, but basically in the end they whittled down my role into.. nothing.
The class is an information technology class, and as a part of our major project we were to research a business, and find a piece of software that could improve the efficiency of the company. We postulated that a proper POS system with a scheduling and inventory module, in addition to a table side electronic serving app would allow the restaurant that we were examining to reduce costs.
As time went on (as recently as Monday night) there was a dispute as to the scope of our project.
My part of the project was to 1. create a decision criteria 2. research possible solutions and 3. research possible vendors.
(and analyse which would be best)
As time went on I searched for 3 different pieces of software, however, only one of them had a mobile app. As a result, my group members thought that we should not include the ones that didn't have one as a part of our analysis, and this is where the divide started.
Also, the research that I would do on each piece of software depended on the decision criteria, something that took them 4-5 days to even respond to my multiple emails, it was only on Monday that they finally got back to me.
In my experience, I need to qualify why the piece of software I am nominating is the best. I can't simply say 'just trust me' -- instead, I present 2-3 options, and based upon the decision criteria nominate one of the options.
Rather than listen to me, my group basically told me that I was wasting my time, being stupid, and they wouldn't listen to me, or accept my input, or the value of my experience. I used to work as an IT Manager, part of my job was to analyse and recommend different software for different functions.
In the end, my partners said, don't bother with the other 3 options, just analyse the one with the mobile app, which made no sense to me. How can you make a recommendation without anything to contrast it with?
In the end it was a 2v1 scenario, my other groupmates were friends, and they clearly worked on the same wavelength, that I didn't share. My part of the project was constantly being adjusted, and my responsibilities were constantly being changed, but not by me.
It was an awful situation. Fundamentally we just disagreed on how things should be done, and I hated constantly being bossed around by people that thought they were better than me. It was insulting. Furthermore, I had Salmonella poisoning for a significant portion of October, which didn't help things.
There were other things, such as arranging for a group meeting, and then them not emailing me where or when until 30 minutes before the meeting was to start, and getting pissed off when I was late. The fact is, they were jerks, and I've never encountered this situation before.