Ground vs. Air - What's more Economical, really?

cbrunny

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 2007
6,791
406
126
I don't get it. I have a package that is coming from BC to Ontario. And I think it's coming by ground.

In a straight shot, that is 4262kms, most of which is through the USA. Add to that the re-sorts at various facilities along the way and the number of hands and times the package gets moved... I can't help but think that'd be crazy expensive.

How is it that ground is cheaper than air? Is fuel and permits for air travel really that expensive? Seems crazy to me.

Or are they shipping by air from BC to Toronto then ground the rest of the way (as if they had a different choice)? I don't get it. Canada Post Expedited Parcel, fwiw.
 

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,420
1,600
126
shipping by ground:
unit-trains-3.jpg


shipping by plane:
747_400.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oyeve

KMFJD

Lifer
Aug 11, 2005
33,639
53,931
136
I don't get it. I have a package that is coming from BC to Ontario. And I think it's coming by ground.

In a straight shot, that is 4262kms, most of which is through the USA. Add to that the re-sorts at various facilities along the way and the number of hands and times the package gets moved... I can't help but think that'd be crazy expensive.

How is it that ground is cheaper than air? Is fuel and permits for air travel really that expensive? Seems crazy to me.

Or are they shipping by air from BC to Toronto then ground the rest of the way (as if they had a different choice)? I don't get it. Canada Post Expedited Parcel, fwiw.

Every time i get anything from BC through CP Expedited it's flown to Mississauga and then shipped ground the rest of the way (2 more days usually)
 
Last edited:

cbrunny

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 2007
6,791
406
126
Every time i get anything from BC through CP Expedited it's flown to Mississauga and then shipped ground the rest of the way (2 more days usually)

This is my expectation as well. But curiously long delivery time - like 10 days or something. If flown, I'd expect it much sooner than that. But I suppose if it is really by train that would explain the length.
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
26,189
4,855
126
A rough estimate would be 0.01 gal/kg/hr more jet fuel. So, a 1 kg package flying for 5 hours (you need to include the occasional extra flight time for storms, etc) would use about 0.05 gal of jet fuel. Assuming 8 CAD/gallon of jet fuel, that is 0.4 CAD more. Add in higher costs of security screening and you still come up with next to nothing. But, over billions of packages it is enough to add up.

I don't think there are any fewer package handoffs by going air. You still need to truck it from the central facility to the airport and from the airport to the next central facility. You still need to truck it to/from the central facilities to/from the end points. Plus, cargo flights might not be direct, so you have to add in those transfer costs and the extra fuel for not flying direct.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
60,725
11,103
126
That's a hell of a curve on those tracks. Must have had some curved rail they wanted to get rid of.
 

cbrunny

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 2007
6,791
406
126
Interesting. Item arrived in Mississauga ON this morning (Thursday) after departing Richmond BC on Sunday PM. Transit time like that, it could have very realistically traveled by ground all the way from BC either on a train or by truck. I can't believe an item this small is better off shipping on the ground.
 

who?

Platinum Member
Sep 1, 2012
2,327
42
91
If you add up all of the packages travelling between those two cities it might take another plane to move them all. They didn't put a whole trailer on the flatbed traincar just for your package.
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
71,160
14,014
126
www.anyf.ca
My guess is when you choose air, it's guaranteed to go by air or at least the fastest method possible. When you pick ground, it might still go by air when going from one long distance centre to the other. Just guessing though.

I always find that most packages end up in Mississauga pretty much right away, and then straight to me, but sometimes they end up in Concorde, when that happens, they sit for like 3 days. Been a while since I've seen that though.
 

cbrunny

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 2007
6,791
406
126
If you add up all of the packages travelling between those two cities it might take another plane to move them all. They didn't put a whole trailer on the flatbed traincar just for your package.

oh really? i just assumed my little package with free shipping warranted extravagant care. I fully expected it's own traincar, fully padded of course, complete with in-ride entertainment and refreshments.
 

who?

Platinum Member
Sep 1, 2012
2,327
42
91
That's a hell of a curve on those tracks. Must have had some curved rail they wanted to get rid of.
The drive wheels on a locomotive slip if you try to make it go up more than a shallow grade so you use big curves to reduce the grade on a big rise. Also the motor probably doesn't have a lot of reserve power to maintain speed up a steep grade.
Air would involve a hub and spoke system, not a direct flight.
 
Last edited: