Green Party Gubernatorial Candidate Rich Whitney on Chicago ballots as Rich Whitey

Status
Not open for further replies.

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
http://www.suntimes.com/news/elections/2801976,CST-NWS-whitney14.article

Illinois Green Party Gubernatorial Candidate Rich Whitney appears on ballots as Rich Whitey in 23 Chicago wards, roughly half of which are predominantly black areas. Since the Green Party predominantly draws votes away from the Democrat Party and this IS Chicago, I'm going to assume this is a dirty trick.

Since it's so freakin' funny I'm going to excuse it.
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,839
2,625
136
OK 99% of the people here know more about programming than I do, but the claim that the state can't fix this error in the three weeks left before election day boggles my mind.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
OK 99% of the people here know more about programming than I do, but the claim that the state can't fix this error in the three weeks left before election day boggles my mind.

Govt quagmire. By the time it gets through the approval process it will be 2013.
 

PJABBER

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
4,822
0
0
The Greens did it deliberately. It is an inside joke. All they wanted to say was that their candidate couldn't handle his weed.

Greens! LOL! Gotta luv 'em!
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Since the Green Party predominantly draws votes away from the Democrat Party and this IS Chicago, I'm going to assume this is a dirty trick.

Both sides doing dirty tricks in Illinois.

The counties with a high amount of military overseas didn't bother to send absentee ballots out to the soldiers since 8 out 10 military vote Republican.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Both sides doing dirty tricks in Illinois.

The counties with a high amount of military overseas didn't bother to send absentee ballots out to the soldiers since 8 out 10 military vote Republican.

Probably true - it IS Illinois. (And it's freakin' hard to resist a dirty trick that funny. "Hey man, something wrong with my ballot. It says "Rich Whitey" - but it doesn't say which Rich Whitey."

I'd have to look into the missing ballots a bit more. I know the Dems launched a whole bevy of lawyers on Florida on election day 2000 to preemptively challenge military ballots. But some states have such late primaries (trying to reduce the cost and length of the election) that it's damned hard to meet the deadline. New York for example had only four days between it's primary and the deadline for mailing out military ballots - practically speaking this is probably impossible.

This needs to be attacked on two fronts (besides strict enforcement.) States need to establish primaries far enough out to meet the deadline, and the federal government needs to set a statute date to ensure this. It is a national election, after all. And the military, states, and DoJ need to work together to ensure that every service member gets ample opportunity to be rotated to a place where he or she can vote electronically.

LMAO Genx87!
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,839
2,625
136
Both sides doing dirty tricks in Illinois.

The counties with a high amount of military overseas didn't bother to send absentee ballots out to the soldiers since 8 out 10 military vote Republican.

I know in my state (and several others I have studied) the voter has to specifically request an absentee ballot-I'm not aware of any state that sends the ballots out unsolicited. Many (most?) states have changed their absentee ballot procedures to make it easier, not harder, for our service members to timely cast their votes-and the feds, under the Federal Voting Assistance Program-have been actively pushing the states along in that effort.

Are you claiming election officials are violating their oath and committing crimes by deliberately not sending out properly requested ballots? I'd like to see a link to that info (as well as a link to your claim that 8 out of 10 soldiers vote Republican).

The Department of Justice has an extremely active elections fraud section and has for years and I haven't heard of any such trials. This sounds like BS to me without anything concrete to back it up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.