GPU for i3-4330, 5770 upgrade

Danrr

Member
Dec 8, 2014
53
0
16
Hi to all,

I'm new to the forums but I have been lurking the threads from time to time, currently I'm updating my current PC:

AMD Phenom II X2 555 (X3) 3.2 ghz
ASUS M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3
4 GB A-DATA DDR3 1600 RAM
AMD 5770 XFX
500GB Hard drive
600W PSU

With the following parts:

Intel Core i3-4330 3.5 Ghz
ASRock H97M Pro4
8GB RAM Crucial Ballistix Sport 1600
GPU goes here
Crucial MX-100 SSD 128GB x2
600W PSU

I have a budget of $100-$150 currently, I have to deal with import taxes and the freight to Mexico, if the deal is good I can spend $200 max.

What could be the best upgrade/replacement for my old 5770?
 

Burpo

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2013
4,223
473
126
Buy used.. You can get a mint R9 280X w/3gb for around $150 on ebay..

$_57.JPG
 
Last edited:

Danrr

Member
Dec 8, 2014
53
0
16

Thanks for your reply, I saw a some reviews and I think I will aim for the 270.

Buy used.. You can get a mint R9 280X w/3gb for around $150 on ebay..

$_57.JPG

Normally I don't buy at eBay, but I will search there too, thanks.
 

Red Hawk

Diamond Member
Jan 1, 2011
3,266
169
106
Most reviews probably test with quad core processors rather than dual core. SPBHM does have a point. Really, the best thing would be to have a quad core processor. A dual core processor is going to increasingly fall short with modern games.
 

Danrr

Member
Dec 8, 2014
53
0
16
Most reviews probably test with quad core processors rather than dual core. SPBHM does have a point. Really, the best thing would be to have a quad core processor. A dual core processor is going to increasingly fall short with modern games.

Well I not consider my self to be a hardcore gamer, I'm more a casual gamer. And since I already bought the parts I will have to stick with the i3 for the moment.

Also the GTX 760 is selling around $200-$250 which is out of my budget.

Thanks for your replies.
 

SPBHM

Diamond Member
Sep 12, 2012
5,066
418
126
yes basically all reviews are made using i7s, it's not just one game, from other CPU bound gaming tests from gamegpu/pclab there is a clear pattern, Nvidia GPUs seem to have lower CPU overhead.

if you have an i5 I don't see a problem with the AMD cards, but for an i3 I would be worried, and from my years of using i3 + AMD (but older stuff) I always had worse CPU bottlenecks than reviews (using NV GPUs) would lead me to believe I should have,

and on another new title, "The Crew" they noticed the same problem with i3 + AMD

"On the face of it, The Crew's GPU requirements are relatively light for a great experience. However, similar to Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare we found that performance on AMD cards (we tested the R9 270X and R9 280) was considerably impacted in city areas when paired with a Core i3 CPU, whereas the Nvidia GTX 760 - which sits in the middle of the two AMD cards generally - worked just fine on the dual core processor. Once again it seems that AMD requires a better CPU to get the most out of the graphics card. Switching to a Core i5 saw the frame-rate drops we saw all but disappear."
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-the-crew-face-off

GTX 660 is a fine card and easy to find for less than $150, slower than the 270 but with the i3, on CPU bound situations I think it would deliver a better experience.
 

Danrr

Member
Dec 8, 2014
53
0
16
yes basically all reviews are made using i7s, it's not just one game, from other CPU bound gaming tests from gamegpu/pclab there is a clear pattern, Nvidia GPUs seem to have lower CPU overhead.

if you have an i5 I don't see a problem with the AMD cards, but for an i3 I would be worried, and from my years of using i3 + AMD (but older stuff) I always had worse CPU bottlenecks than reviews (using NV GPUs) would lead me to believe I should have,

and on another new title, "The Crew" they noticed the same problem with i3 + AMD

"On the face of it, The Crew's GPU requirements are relatively light for a great experience. However, similar to Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare we found that performance on AMD cards (we tested the R9 270X and R9 280) was considerably impacted in city areas when paired with a Core i3 CPU, whereas the Nvidia GTX 760 - which sits in the middle of the two AMD cards generally - worked just fine on the dual core processor. Once again it seems that AMD requires a better CPU to get the most out of the graphics card. Switching to a Core i5 saw the frame-rate drops we saw all but disappear."
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-the-crew-face-off

GTX 660 is a fine card and easy to find for less than $150, slower than the 270 but with the i3, on CPU bound situations I think it would deliver a better experience.

Well... now I can't decide which one to buy lol, will have to research more to pick one.

Thanks for your reply, I maybe upgrade the CPU to an i5 in mid 2015 so getting a bottleneck with a vid card now could pay off.

What games do you play?

Currently:

Skyrim
CSGO
Heroes & Generals
DAYZ

and
GTA V (when it comes out)
 

SPBHM

Diamond Member
Sep 12, 2012
5,066
418
126
I can see GTA V working a lot better with 660 + i3 than 270 + i3, but we will have to wait to be sure;

Skyrim and CSGO are not all that demanding, Dayz performs poorly in any hardware, Heroes and Generals is sponsored by Nvidia, but I don't know the game well enough, and the i3 should handle it fine with the radeon.