In California, the state is about to release Patrick Henry Ghilotti--a man who raped eight women. He's been classified as a "sexually violent predator" under a new law passed in 1996. A superior court judge thinks he's fit to return to society. His doctors and the district attorney were against releasing him, but the judge overruled them. The cost of monitoring him is $100,000 a year, whereas keeping him imprisoned is somewhere around $30,000. Yeah, he'll be monitored--but tell that to the women of Los Angeles, who face increasingly tougher restrictions on their ability to use guns for self-defense. Watch yourselves, ladies. Your government is about to unleash a sexual predator.
Story
This one is not about gun control folks, so no flames regarding that. This one is about a government stooge not listening to the experts. Thing is, the judge has judicial immunity, which means that if this man rapes again, the judge setting him free faces no reprecussions from the victim, or the victim's family. California, what do you think of that?
Story
This one is not about gun control folks, so no flames regarding that. This one is about a government stooge not listening to the experts. Thing is, the judge has judicial immunity, which means that if this man rapes again, the judge setting him free faces no reprecussions from the victim, or the victim's family. California, what do you think of that?
