- Jul 12, 2007
- 6,211
- 121
- 106
As the thread title implies, I am getting ready to discuss my compensation level with the partners of my law firm. Any of you armchair experts gone through this and have any tips on how to break the ice and instigate/carry out the conversation?
In my circumstance I feel that the partners undercharge clients for my time (i.e., my billable rate is too low for my experience level and efficiency). As my billable rate bears a direct correlation to my salary, I also feel that I am underpaid for my experience level. Specifically, I think the partners should raise my billable rate by $25-30/hour and increase my salary by $25-30k/year. To me this is a win win. Partners make more money off me, and I make a salary consistent with my experience level. Clients won't care because there will be very little difference in their bill (I'm very efficient).
I've given this quite a bit of thought and spent some time gathering facts in support of my upcoming request. Those facts include:
1. Out of all the attorneys in the firm, I bring in the most $$. I am responsible for ~13.5% of gross billings. Next closest attorney is one of the partners, who is responsible for ~10.4% of gross billings.
2. I have achieved #1 despite having a billing rate that is at least $50 lower than all of the other attorneys in the firm of comparable experience.
3. I work completely without supervision and produce excellent work product (recognized by my firm, my clients, and my colleagues).
4. My presence and work product is the direct cause of significant new work being brought into the firm from existing clients (recognized by partners).
5. I train/manage 2 of our 3 junior level attorneys.
6. There are three associate level attorneys at my firm that have billing rates $50 higher than mine. I am (objectively) more skilled and more independent than two of them, and I am on par with the other.
7. Admittedly not a 1:1 comparison, but I was paid roughly the same amount I am now (adjusting for differences in billable hour requirements, etc.) when I worked for a large firm in 2009. At that time my billable rate was $150/hour higher than it is now, and I have 5 more years of experience than I did in 2009.
8. Unlike all other employees at my firm, I do not purchase medical insurance through my firm. Rather, I get it through my wife's work. My firm pays 100% of the cost of an attorney's medical insurance. Which amounts to roughly ~$1100/month benefit. In other words, I am a "cheap" employee.
9. Apart from 1-8, I am not asking for a raise "for nothing." I'm saying that the partners should consider raising my billable rate to account for my skill and experience level, and compensate me accordingly.
10. 2013 stats for the market we are in indicate that the median and mean salaries for an attorney of my skill and experience are ~20-40k higher than my current salary.
11. I am slated to exceed my billed hour requirement this year by ~15%. This, in combination with #1 and #8 indicate that I am basically a money tree for my firm.
I'm sure I could come up with others, but those are what come to mind at the moment.
Thoughts?
update I talked with one of the partners in my firm about the raise. Basically told him that I think the firm was charging too little for my time, and that they could raise my billable rate by X% without a meaningful impact on clients. I suggested that the partnership consider doing that and, in exchange, give me a X% raise.
It took a little while (mainly because the partners got waylaid with tax issues this year resulting from the expiration of Bush era tax cuts), but I got the good news yesterday. The partners agreed with my suggestion. Apparently making business sense works when asking one's employer for a raise.

It also helped that I was the highest grossing associate in the firm last fiscal year, despite having a significantly lower billable rate than all of the other associates.
cliffs
OP feels he is underpaid by about 25-30k/year.
OP wants partners to charge more for his time and compensate him accordingly.
OP is looking for tips on how to initiate and conduct the discussion.
update
OP spoke to partners about raise - X% increase in billable rate for X% increase in salary
Partners mulled it over and gave OP what he asked for.
Profit
In my circumstance I feel that the partners undercharge clients for my time (i.e., my billable rate is too low for my experience level and efficiency). As my billable rate bears a direct correlation to my salary, I also feel that I am underpaid for my experience level. Specifically, I think the partners should raise my billable rate by $25-30/hour and increase my salary by $25-30k/year. To me this is a win win. Partners make more money off me, and I make a salary consistent with my experience level. Clients won't care because there will be very little difference in their bill (I'm very efficient).
I've given this quite a bit of thought and spent some time gathering facts in support of my upcoming request. Those facts include:
1. Out of all the attorneys in the firm, I bring in the most $$. I am responsible for ~13.5% of gross billings. Next closest attorney is one of the partners, who is responsible for ~10.4% of gross billings.
2. I have achieved #1 despite having a billing rate that is at least $50 lower than all of the other attorneys in the firm of comparable experience.
3. I work completely without supervision and produce excellent work product (recognized by my firm, my clients, and my colleagues).
4. My presence and work product is the direct cause of significant new work being brought into the firm from existing clients (recognized by partners).
5. I train/manage 2 of our 3 junior level attorneys.
6. There are three associate level attorneys at my firm that have billing rates $50 higher than mine. I am (objectively) more skilled and more independent than two of them, and I am on par with the other.
7. Admittedly not a 1:1 comparison, but I was paid roughly the same amount I am now (adjusting for differences in billable hour requirements, etc.) when I worked for a large firm in 2009. At that time my billable rate was $150/hour higher than it is now, and I have 5 more years of experience than I did in 2009.
8. Unlike all other employees at my firm, I do not purchase medical insurance through my firm. Rather, I get it through my wife's work. My firm pays 100% of the cost of an attorney's medical insurance. Which amounts to roughly ~$1100/month benefit. In other words, I am a "cheap" employee.
9. Apart from 1-8, I am not asking for a raise "for nothing." I'm saying that the partners should consider raising my billable rate to account for my skill and experience level, and compensate me accordingly.
10. 2013 stats for the market we are in indicate that the median and mean salaries for an attorney of my skill and experience are ~20-40k higher than my current salary.
11. I am slated to exceed my billed hour requirement this year by ~15%. This, in combination with #1 and #8 indicate that I am basically a money tree for my firm.
I'm sure I could come up with others, but those are what come to mind at the moment.
Thoughts?
update I talked with one of the partners in my firm about the raise. Basically told him that I think the firm was charging too little for my time, and that they could raise my billable rate by X% without a meaningful impact on clients. I suggested that the partnership consider doing that and, in exchange, give me a X% raise.
It took a little while (mainly because the partners got waylaid with tax issues this year resulting from the expiration of Bush era tax cuts), but I got the good news yesterday. The partners agreed with my suggestion. Apparently making business sense works when asking one's employer for a raise.
cliffs
OP feels he is underpaid by about 25-30k/year.
OP wants partners to charge more for his time and compensate him accordingly.
OP is looking for tips on how to initiate and conduct the discussion.
update
OP spoke to partners about raise - X% increase in billable rate for X% increase in salary
Partners mulled it over and gave OP what he asked for.
Profit
Last edited: