Given a moderate activity level, most peoples maintenance calories are somewhere in between 14-16 cals per pound of bodyweight. Since your maintenance is how many calories it takes to maintain your weight, you should shoot for about 10-20% below that value. I'd say aim for the lower range as fat loss will obviously be faster and it's still not too much of a deficit. Remember that added activity will also contribute to calories burned and will effect fat loss, just don't overdo it.
Besides calories, adequate protein is very important. I'd suggest upping protein to at least 1g per pound of bodyweight. You're not severely overweight so the protein level won't be unattainable and too much is always better than too little.
If you are not already you should definitely start a weight training routine as well. It will help prevent LBM loss and assuming you're a beginner you will see very nice strength gains and maybe even some muscle gain.
Originally posted by: bignateyk
It's damn near impossible to have a visible 6-pack while not flexing. I am 5'11", 165lbs, and have a really low body fat percentage (somewhere around 10-12%), and I have a 6-pack, but only when I flex. I'd say there's no way in hell you're gonna do it in a month.
Originally posted by: KoolDrew
Originally posted by: bignateyk
It's damn near impossible to have a visible 6-pack while not flexing. I am 5'11", 165lbs, and have a really low body fat percentage (somewhere around 10-12%), and I have a 6-pack, but only when I flex. I'd say there's no way in hell you're gonna do it in a month.
Since when is 10-12% considered really low?
Originally posted by: TheVrolok
Originally posted by: KoolDrew
Originally posted by: bignateyk
It's damn near impossible to have a visible 6-pack while not flexing. I am 5'11", 165lbs, and have a really low body fat percentage (somewhere around 10-12%), and I have a 6-pack, but only when I flex. I'd say there's no way in hell you're gonna do it in a month.
Since when is 10-12% considered really low?
10-12 is pretty low. Especially depending on your body type. We're not talking about olympians here.
Originally posted by: KoolDrew
Originally posted by: TheVrolok
Originally posted by: KoolDrew
Originally posted by: bignateyk
It's damn near impossible to have a visible 6-pack while not flexing. I am 5'11", 165lbs, and have a really low body fat percentage (somewhere around 10-12%), and I have a 6-pack, but only when I flex. I'd say there's no way in hell you're gonna do it in a month.
Since when is 10-12% considered really low?
10-12 is pretty low. Especially depending on your body type. We're not talking about olympians here.
Most people will not have much definition at all when around 10-12% bodyfat. To have visible abs (many consider this being "in shape") a male will usually have to be below 10%.
Originally posted by: Barack Obama
Can I get a six pack from just doing situps? How many situps to do each day. I don't have much fat in my stomach and I'll jog/play ball to get rid of it. Thanks for the help :beer: (low-carb :beer:)
Originally posted by: MegaVovaN
Originally posted by: Barack Obama
Can I get a six pack from just doing situps? How many situps to do each day. I don't have much fat in my stomach and I'll jog/play ball to get rid of it. Thanks for the help :beer: (low-carb :beer:)
NO! NO! and NO!
Sit ups won't even work your abs. http://worldfitnessnetwork.com....php/sit-ups-suck-abs/
To get your abs, grow some muscle on them (crunches), and lower overall bodyfat % under 10%, until you start seeing them abs. Sit ups won't lower the bodyfat %. You lower bf% through controlled diet and aerobic exercise! (Run/bike/swim)
You cannot spot reduce! :| You can do sit ups and crunches all day long, and will never see 'teh sixt pakc".
Honestly, Obama - do you even read this forum?
Originally posted by: IcebergSlim
I WILL ONLY SAY THIS ONCE and ONCE ONLY!
ABS ARE MADE IN THE KITCHEN