Because a large number of people who get abortions are people who are incapable of taking care of a child, which means that said costs are passed on to society.High horse? Having an objection to a mother killing her own child constitutes looking down my nose at people?
Which is utterly irrelevant to the larger abortion debate. I didn't bring up a single religious argument.
I'd like to hear an argument why a child must die to save it from it's own life. The nature of the judgment we are passing on this child, that we can decide on its behalf whether or not it is worthy of life, with it utterly unable to defend itself, is horrifying.
What is it about leftists using the unbelievable exceptions to the rule to define the rule?
How does society benefit from allowing mothers to kill their own children?
Of course this doesnt really make an argument for the pro-choice position but for a literal pro-abortion position. Society has judged that 15 year olds are not capable of driving cars, but for some reason if a 15 year old girl gets pregnant liberals will fall over themselves worshipping whatever choice she makes :\
*note: I just want to make clear Atreus that I completely respect your position.