GOP blocks nomination to head new Consumer Financial Agency

[monovillage]

While I avoid your posts, the occasional read and response:

There was NOTHING WRONG with your examples - except for being too RIGHT WING.

Bork is one of the few cases the Senate actually worked, rejecting a dangerous radical.

Republicans have been calling for misguided 'revenge' ever since just as they want 'revenge' for Watergate causing Nixon's resignation or the people wanted 'revenge' for the Indians killing Custer who was there to kill their men, women and children. The blame is on Reagan for appointing someone so bad for the country.

Thomas is a case of the Senate FAILING - by three votes - to vote down another TERRIBLE candidate, who in part was correctly exposed for sexual harassment.

The Republicans lied and smeared the woman who told the truth to inform the country, and then demand 'revenge' for Thomas having been attacked.

The way the health care bill passed the Senate was because of Republican abuse of the filibuster and obstructionism.

Simply put, the Republicans were the whores of the special interests and wanted to block any such reform, to benefit the industries.

The fact is, the Republicans have done almost all of the 'abuses' in recent decades, from filibuster abuse to changing the rules as it suits them to locking Dems out of meetings.

This post is wasted on the quoted poster, it's for other readers.

Thank you for another post that proves my point about the reality in Washington.

 

[cybrsage]

No. Go study that chart some more and see if you can come up with any other ideas.

Instead of me having to hunt and search for what you really mean, why don't you actually state it here. Clearly and proudly state your position. When you do not, I have to start creating your position for you.

 

[fskimospy]

Instead of me having to hunt and search for what you really mean, why don't you actually state it here. Clearly and proudly state your position. When you do not, I have to start creating your position for you.

I already have quite clearly, and no you do not.

This lack of basic reading skills is showing up all over the place. Are you okay? Do we need special posting rules for you so that you can better grasp the concepts going around?

 

[cybrsage]

You failed to post your position.

 

[fskimospy]

You failed to post your position.

I have already posted my position. Until you have gone back, read it more carefully and reported back your understanding I'm not discussing this further.

I'm sorry that I have to be like this with you, but you've proven yourself to be unable to handle more adult discussion. I feel like I'm hitting a dog with a newspaper.

 

[cybrsage]

Be proud of it, don't squirrel it away. Say it again.

Refusing to post at least a link to your position means you are ashamed of your own position.

You complain that people do not understand what your position is...then refuse to post it when asked.

 

[fskimospy]

Be proud of it, don't squirrel it away. Say it again.

Refusing to post at least a link to your position means you are ashamed of your own position.

You complain that people do not understand what your position is...then refuse to post it when asked.

I am simply unwilling to put any more time into you. It's all there for you to read, plain as day. Go do it. That's it.